Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Palin was a Member of Fringe Alaskan Secessionist Party

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 10:02 AM on September 2, 2008.


The Alaska Independence Party's motto: "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."

What may prove to be the single most damaging angle to Sarah Palin's role on the Republican Party ticket? There are quite a few contenders (ethics scandal, earmarks, inexperience, outside-the-mainstream views), but following up on Hilzoy's item from last night, Palin's association with the Alaska Independence Party might be the most politically detrimental.

It's practically impossible to make a "Country First" argument when your running mate is affiliated with a political party that puts country second.

Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which since the 1970s has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.

And while McCain's motto -- as seen in a new TV ad -- is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."

Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time.

"We are a state's rights party," Clark -- a self-employed goldminer -- tells ABC News. The AIP has "a plank that challenges the legality of the Alaskan statehood vote as illegal and in violation of United Nations charter and international law."

For all the talk about Barack and Michelle Obama's patriotism, John McCain's running mate was a member of a political party that liked the idea of seceding from the United States altogether. It's the kind of idea that would have been more common in the 1850s.

Advocating secession is, practically by definition, un-American. How does the right go after Obama's patriotism while supporting a ticket with a candidate who joined a secessionist party?

We are, after all, talking about a party founded by a man who said, "I'm an Alaskan, not an American. I've got no use for America or her damned institutions." The same man, AIP founder Joe Vogler, also said, "[T]he fires of Hell are glaciers compared to my hate for the American government."

How is this any better than Jeremiah Wright? Why would Sarah Palin voluntarily join this man's political party?

Complicating matters, Marc Ambinder has a video of a AIP leader explaining that party members "must 'infiltrate' -- his words -- the other two parties and push for the cause of Alaskan independence."

I suspect McCain and his aides didn't know about any of this. Indeed, they couldn't have -- they didn't vet her. But now that this revelation has come to light, what's the defense?

AlterNet is a nonprofit organization and does not make political endorsements. The opinions expressed by its writers are their own.

Digg!


Roadblock Republicans Start Throwing Around the F-Word
The Senate minority Republicans are already talking about filibusters. And lots of 'em.
November 22, 2008.
Obama's (Rumored) Pick for Secretary of the Treasury Makes Wall Street Happy
He's going to be the Secretary of the Treasury in the midst of a financial crisis, so it's probably worth taking the time to get to know him.
November 21, 2008.
Obama's Team Makes Good on Threat of Bipartisanship
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel spent a day on the Hill doing Republican outreach.
November 21, 2008.
Karl Rove the Hypocrite Doles Out Advice for Obama
I'm trying to pick my favorite part of Rove's latest column in the Wall Street Journal. There are so many gems to choose from.
November 20, 2008.
The Coming Econ-ocalypse: Job Markets Tank
I don't want to alarm anyone, but the job market appears to be in pretty horrendous shape.
November 20, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why Does Sarah Palin Hate America?
Posted by: ranchero42 on Sep 2, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does she poach out on the happy hunting ground, or will she wait until Alaska rejoins Russia?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This ends her candidacy
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Sep 2, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the last (and possibly biggest) straw.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Proud American
Posted by: FMABBI on Sep 2, 2008 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palin should gracefully bow out now before her acceptance speech tomorrow because of personal family priorities, etc. McCain should take back the control of his party and select the VP he really wants - Lieberman or Ridge and be done with it. Palin has been sacrificed - another Harriet Miers fiasco! Country First my foot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Proud American Posted by: VZEQICVA
Why is this a surprise?
Posted by: TKirwin on Sep 2, 2008 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush was always a Texan first, and I would argue that he and Chaney have never stood for Americans; just their buddies. Why would it be surprising then that McSame would seek anyone outside of that mold?

Palin skill set:

Opportunist (look at her record)
Likes to make others follow her beliefs (anti-mother/anti-choice)
Facts and science take a back seat to ideology (polar bear habitat destruction)
Happy to abuse power to punish her enemies (troopergate)
Will lie about past positions for political gain (bridge to nowhere)

The right must LOVE her!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why is this a surprise? Posted by: OpenMinded
Secession is an American tradition and a right of free people
Posted by: jimbabb on Sep 2, 2008 5:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are these words unamerican?

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Secession....Un-American???
Posted by: Republicae-Seditionist on Sep 2, 2008 7:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I am not a supporter of either McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden, I do support the right of secession as one that the Founders were not only well aware of, but also implemented when they seceded from Great Britain. They also affirmed the right of secession in the fact that they all agreed that the States acceded to the Union and remained sovereign and independent States even after that accession to the Union, they did not relinquish a single right or power by acceding to a voluntary union with the other States. James Madison, Father of the Constitution was very clear that: “Each State in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act.”

In other words, the States are the only parties to the compact we call the Constitution and through the act of this compact they created the federal government. As Chief Justice John Marshall said: “those who create a government also have the power to destroy that government”

We have long forgotten the foundations of this country, that it was formed through the act of secession from the British Crown, we seem to forget that the Sovereign and Independent States that form this country had the power to create this government and in the voluntary act through State Convention they also have the right to disband the very compact they used to create it in the first place.


You would think from reading many of these comments that most of you had never read the Federalist Papers. No wonder we are so eager to roll over and relinquish our Rights, most of the People in this country don’t seem to understand just what those Rights really are or what they really mean. That is obvious from this article and many of these comments.

“Un-American???”, I would have to say that it is perhaps one of the most American of Rights retained by the People of this country. Just look up what it means to be a Confederated Republic, or a Federation, that is the form of governments we are suppose to have in this country. One where the Consent of the People is the highest sovereignty, one where self-determination is the prime example of Liberty and Freedom, where Peoples decisions cannot be forced upon them at the end of a bayonet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This Country...
Posted by: Republicae-Seditionist on Sep 2, 2008 7:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing Government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary right to dismember or overthrow it."~Abraham Lincoln

The real question behind that statement is what changed his mind? No, it wasn't slavery. Think tariffs, think centralized power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This Country... Posted by: Intellect
» RE: This Country... Posted by: Livemike
» RE: This Country... Posted by: Republicae-Seditionist
» RE: This Country... Posted by: Republicae-Seditionist
Fringe party?
Posted by: Julian on Sep 2, 2008 8:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe, but it called for a referendum. If the people voted against secession, end of story. If they voted for it, secession is their right -- a right enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter. To the best of my knowledge the secessionists in the slave states at no time demanded a referendum, with all inhabitants of the Confederate States eligible to vote. If that's the case their secession was no better than a coup. Without the free consent of the people, secession is treason - but the Alaskan "fringe group" were not calling for treason but for a referendum to assert a right. Watch Scotland!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fringe party? Posted by: Livemike
Clearer words
Posted by: Julian on Sep 2, 2008 9:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"..with all the inhabitants of the Confederate States eligible to vote" could be misconstrued. A better wording would be "..with all the inhabitants of the Confederate States BEING eligible to vote". I.e. not accepting just who the slaveowners considered eligible, but eligibility to be extended to slaves as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clearer words Posted by: Republicae-Seditionist