Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Rachel Maddow Getting Her Own Show Matters ... A Lot

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 9:26 AM on August 20, 2008.


When you step back and consider Rachel's promotion in context ... the announcement isn't just heartening -- it's important.

I'm very rarely encouraged by any of the decisions made by major news outlets. Yesterday afternoon, however, was a spectacular exception.

Rachel Maddow has been sounding off about politics on MSNBC so often she might as well have her own show.

And now she does.

The liberal commentator and Air America radio host, who has become a breakout star for the cable channel during the presidential campaign, is taking over the 9 p.m. slot following Keith Olbermann, whom she often subs for on "Countdown." Olbermann broke what he called a "fully authorized leak" yesterday on the left-wing Web site Daily Kos. Dan Abrams, the former MSNBC general manager who had been hosting "Verdict" at that hour, will continue as NBC's chief legal correspondent, become a "Dateline" contributor and serve as a daytime anchor for MSNBC.

A recent profile of Rachel in the Nation noted, "Maddow didn't get here by bluster and bravado but with a combination of crisp thinking and galumphing good cheer. Remarkably, this season's discovery isn't a glossy matinee idol or a smooth-talking partisan hack but a PhD Rhodes scholar lesbian policy wonk who started as a prison AIDS activist."

I'd just add that Rachel is, without doubt or hesitation, the best political observer on television, and her insightful analysis of the 2008 cycle has set a very high bar for the rest of the media to follow. The question hasn't been whether Rachel would get her own prime-time show; the question has been why Rachel didn't already have her own prime-time show.

But when we step back and consider Rachel's promotion in context, I think it's fair to say this announcement isn't just heartening -- it's important.
Ezra, with tongue planted firmly in cheek, noted that this development breaks the "rules."

Rachel Maddow just got her own show. And Keith Olbermann announced it, as far as I can tell, in a chummy, comfortable diary on Daily Kos. You know, when I was young, this world had rules. And standards. And liberals did not get TV shows. And liberals who had TV shows did not write on DailyKos. And liberals who had TV shows and wrote on DailyKos did not get TV shows for their even more liberal guest hosts.

All true, but let's go one step further. These same rules and standards have generally mandated that the media eschews merit-based promotions. A couple of months ago, Atrios described the punditocracy as "an accountability-free profession." That's been largely true throughout traditional media outlets for the last decade or so -- ignorance, bombast, and ignorant bombast are rewarded.

Rachel getting her own prime-time show turns this dynamic on its head. I never thought I'd see the day.

A couple of other side notes. First, now that she has her own show, Rachel won't be guest-hosting "Countdown" anymore. Over at dKos, Olbermann joked about his frustration with this development: "Dammit! Why didn't I think of this! She can't be the guest host anymore! I knew I'd forgotten something!" (I have a solution, if MSNBC cares to hear it: when Olbermann can't do "Countdown," just make Rachel's show two hours, instead of one. Problem solved.)

Second, Rachel will keep her show on Air America Radio.

And third, as some of you may know, I avoid television news like the plague. I will, however, be setting the Tivo for "The Rachel Maddow Show."

Digg!

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the former lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, the Guardian, Crooks & Liars, Salon.com’s War Room, Political Wire, and Seven Days.


Roadblock Republicans Start Throwing Around the F-Word
The Senate minority Republicans are already talking about filibusters. And lots of 'em.
November 22, 2008.
Obama's (Rumored) Pick for Secretary of the Treasury Makes Wall Street Happy
He's going to be the Secretary of the Treasury in the midst of a financial crisis, so it's probably worth taking the time to get to know him.
November 21, 2008.
Obama's Team Makes Good on Threat of Bipartisanship
White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel spent a day on the Hill doing Republican outreach.
November 21, 2008.
Karl Rove the Hypocrite Doles Out Advice for Obama
I'm trying to pick my favorite part of Rove's latest column in the Wall Street Journal. There are so many gems to choose from.
November 20, 2008.
The Coming Econ-ocalypse: Job Markets Tank
I don't want to alarm anyone, but the job market appears to be in pretty horrendous shape.
November 20, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
kittyk
Posted by: kittyk on Aug 20, 2008 11:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What great news from Keith last night that Rachel will follow him each PM with her own 1 hour show. These two are the best and always have the facts correct. Add Jonathan Alter to the mix and who can ask for better political news!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jumping up on down on H20 bed last night
Posted by: solitarysherlockian on Aug 20, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While watching Keith--with hints about Rachel, I lived to see a woman--a smart, intelligent woman rather than snarky--get her own pundit show. Hallelujah. Sic' 'em Rachel!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have America's Girl Moderate The Telecom-Immunity Candidates
Posted by: godsbreath64 on Aug 20, 2008 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is this the birth of The American Rennaisance?

Hey Rach', need a name for the show?

How about "Relax, it's(or with) Rachel"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dreams DO come true!
Posted by: deepseas on Aug 20, 2008 11:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the most refreshing news I've heard in awhile. Whenever a new issue comes up, I race to find out Rachel's take on the story. Her astute comments leave the other fish flapping on the shore.

CONGRATS, RACHEL!!! And good for us!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dreams DO come true! Posted by: dhoa1
Wonderful for Rachel, and her audience
Posted by: xamojjomax on Aug 20, 2008 1:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a Air America listener since day 1. I grew to just love Rachel's show - bright, insightful, impartial, professional, funny, self-disparaging. I saw an incredible future for her. How fun to see it unfolding before our eyes. What a gift she is to us.

As a native of the Berkshires of MA, I see her as a 'homegirl' who's done good! I'm old enough to be her mother, and it makes me very happy to see a young woman of such ability rightly reaping the success she so richly deserves.

It sounds corny, but I can't help but think how proud her family must be of her. I loved her reference to her 93 year old grandma on Olbermann last night. That's the kind of person she is - real.

I hope she will be given an opportunity to show us more of the real Rachel in her own show. I'd love to see Rachel be able to dump the suitjackets, hair gel and make-up MSNBC no doubt coerced her into for Olbermann etc. We her audience love her and her work - jeans, tennies and her favorite t's would be fine with this grandma in Washington state!

Rachel, you go get 'em, girl!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How stupid is this?
Posted by: Lauren on Aug 20, 2008 1:19 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A couple of months ago, Atrios described the punditocracy as "an accountability-free profession." That's been largely true throughout traditional media outlets for the last decade or so -- ignorance, bombast, and ignorant bombast are rewarded.

Rachel getting her own prime-time show turns this dynamic on its head. I never thought I'd see the day.


I'm getting very tired of comments like this. The author is supposed to be a blogger, therefore plugged in to what is really going on. Is he trying to ignore, or deny, my political freedom movement?

Really, reporters are incredibly bad. This is just another example of it.

I'd say this magical transformation is entirely expected, planned and implemented. By me. It is a girl scout political action project. Girl scouts weren't supposed to get involved with politics, but when I saw where this administration was going, I got involved.

I do not believe any regular blogger is unaware of my project. So when I read denial like this, I see another person who is part of the problem.

Don't you know? Our government has been hijacked in a 9/11 conspiracy and we want to take it back now? How can this blogger not know this?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How stupid is this? Posted by: oldwoman
Deb
Posted by: debmcd on Aug 20, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GREAT FOR RACHEL. Now I'll have something to watch after Countdown. For all of us who hate all the so called libral media, this is news is most welcomed. I can't think of another person I'd rather have as the host of another news program than Rachel Maddow. She's calm, cheery, intelligent and above all, she puts all those right wing (yawn) media putzes to shame.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WOW!
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 20, 2008 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keith and Rachel back-to-back. TWO LIBERALS IN A ROW????? I can't believe this!(Waits for the world to suddenly end.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OUTSIDE OF THE WEATHER THE ONLY THING I WATCH IS KEITH OLBERMAN,
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 20, 2008 9:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the Daily Show, and Colbert. Now I will have something more. At first when Bush came on I hit the mute or changed channels. Then it extended to any member of the Bush administration. Now I don't even bother with the mute button. I just change channels.

Make note. I don't bother with anything else on MSNBC. I really am prejudiced against FOX. If there are two movies on and one is on Fox and the other is elsewhere, I will make an effort to avoid even FOX channel movies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ditto Posted by: deepseas
Wonderful news
Posted by: janelynne on Aug 21, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I happened to meet Rachael in a seminar situation and was struck with her remarkable warmth and sincerety. She isn't just incredibly smart and solidly liberal. This woman is gifted; one of a kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wonderful news Posted by: godsbreath64
» Of course! Posted by: deepseas