Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

We'll "Never" See McCain's Tax Returns?

Posted by Steve Benen, The Carpetbagger Report at 3:16 AM on May 9, 2008.


Cindy McCain declares herself off limits.

The Obamas released tax returns for both Barack and Michelle. The Clintons released returns for both Bill and Hillary. But when John McCain released his tax returns a few weeks ago, Cindy McCain’s tax documents will remain private.

It’s not too hard to understand why. The McCains are extraordinarily wealthy — one might even be tempted to call them “elites” — and Cindy McCain’s assets are estimated to be about $100 million, including a private jet, which her husband has been borrowing at a reduced rate.

Given the other candidates’ disclosures, and McCain’s own alleged commitment to transparency, will we ever see Cindy McCain’s returns? She was asked on the “Today” show this morning, and said, politely, “Never.”

I'll tell you a little secret: at first blush, I'm not inclined to care. The McCains have more money than some countries, they haven't been accused of any financial improprieties, and while it's interesting when a guy like McCain opposes minimum-wage increases while flying around on his wife's private jet, I'm not exactly itching to go through Cindy McCain's tax returns. In fact, I'm not surprised that someone of her wealth would want to keep her returns free of scrutiny.

But this is absolutely relevant in this presidential campaign for a few reasons.

First, John McCain, for all of his talk about the importance of transparency and disclosure, has gone out of his way to ensure that all of his assets are in his wife’s name. And as Kevin recently noted, "There's only one reason for a politician to make sure that all his assets are in his wife's name: it's to make sure that no one knows anything about his assets. It's not as if McCain is the first pol to try this, after all. Is the press really going to let him get away with this?"

Which leads us to the second reason this matters: McCain has always relied on his wife's wealth, and has always "mixed business and politics." If the point of releasing tax returns is to offer voters a chance to get a better sense of the candidate, then it's incumbent on the McCains to stop acting like they have something to hide.

And third, there's just the shameless hypocrisy of it all. In 2004, the Republican National Committee spent quite a bit of time and energy demanding that the Kerry campaign release Teresa Heinz Kerry’s tax returns. The candidate's wife resisted, but after pressure from the GOP and the media, she eventually gave in and made the materials publicly available.

The situation is exactly the same. John Kerry made less money than his wife, who inherited most of her fortune. McCain is practically broke, and relies on his wife's millions, which were also inherited.

In other words, if we hold the McCains to the standards set by the Republican Party, they owe the public some additional information. The press hounded the Kerrys on this; we’ll see if the media chooses to give the McCains equal treatment. I'm not optimistic.

Digg!


McCain's Negative Campaigning is Backfiring Big Time
New polls show that people care a lot more about the economy then political attacks.
October 15, 2008.
McCain Takes Obama's Bait: Promises to Bring Up Ayers at Debate
He doesn't care about Ayers, but he feels compelled to keep talking about Ayers, and has now promised to bring up Ayers at the debate.
October 14, 2008.
McCain Tries to (Re)Reboot Economic Plan
It's almost as if the McCain campaign is trying to look erratic.
October 14, 2008.
Obama Expands on Economic Plan, Emphasizes 'J-O-B-S'
Obama struck an optimistic yet pragmatic tone in a policy speech on the economy today.
October 13, 2008.
Latest Troopergate: Palin Plays Make Belive; Feels Vindicated
In response to being found guilty of violating the public trust, Palin has decided to play make-believe.
October 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is what I'd like to see.
Posted by: Longdream on May 9, 2008 5:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to see them hammer this woman the way they did Therese Heinz Kerry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember McCain and Charles Keating
Posted by: TruthBeTold on May 12, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain was investigated on ethics charges for helping convicted racketeer Charles Keating after he gave McCain and the other four large campaign contributions (at least $112,000) and vacation trips on Keating's airplanes (some to Keating's Bahamas estate). The collapsed of Keating's Lincoln Savings & Loan cost taxpayers about $3.4 billion.

McCain's wife and her father were the largest investors (at $350,000) in a Keating shopping center. Good reason to not release her tax returns.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT A SLUT
Posted by: mindtrvlr on May 12, 2008 11:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just like a Repuplican.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Makeup or tanning bed?
Posted by: mobilone on May 13, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a truly petty observation, but why is her face a little tan and her neck a little pink-white? At least in the accompanying pic...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

dwvermillion
Posted by: daniel w vermillion on May 16, 2008 3:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
never mind the tan, what about those eyes? spooky, n'est-ce pas? sorry if my spelling is off, it's been a long time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]