Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

After 5 Weeks, 3 GOP Filibusters and 200,000 Americans Running Out of Bennies, Obama to Sign Unemployment Extension

Posted by Steve Benen, Washington Monthly at 12:07 PM on November 6, 2009.


This is how things work in DC these days.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get Steve Benen in your
mailbox!

 

The good news is, President Obama will sign a measure today to extend unemployment benefits for at least 14 weeks for people out of work. It's money well spent -- it helps struggling people, and the investment tends to be stimulative -- and with new, discouraging job numbers, the timing is right.

"Given the employment situation and the general bang for the buck you get from unemployment insurance, that's probably the most sensible of the stimulative policies to extend," Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, said.

The bad news is, it took far too long to get the common-sense bill through Congress. The measure stalled in the Senate for weeks, and while GOP lawmakers dithered, about 200,000 people who are looking for work lost their benefits.

We talked a couple of weeks ago about why Republicans were forcing delays, and Kevin Drum summarized what transpired on the Senate floor yesterday.

 

...Democrats only had to break three separate filibusters in the Senate to get this passed! The first filibuster was broken by a vote of 87-13, the second by a vote of 85-2, and the third by a vote of 97-1. The fourth and final vote, the one to actually pass the bill, was 98-0. Elapsed time: five weeks for a bill that everyone ended up voting for.

Why? Because even though Republicans were allowed to tack on a tax cut to the bill as the price of getting it passed, they decided to filibuster anyway unless they were also allowed to include an anti-ACORN amendment. Seriously. A bit of ACORN blustering to satisfy the Palin-Beck crowd is the reason they held up a bill designed to help people who are out of work in the deepest recession since World War II.... That's called taking governing seriously, my friends.

Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) wondered yesterday why any lawmaker would deliberately hold up unemployment benefits during a recession. "Who are they representing?" she wondered.

I wonder the same thing all the time.

Digg!

Steve Benen is "blogger in chief" of the popular Washington Monthly online blog, Political Animal. His background includes publishing The Carpetbagger Report, and writing for a variety of publications, including Talking Points Memo, The American Prospect, the Huffington Post, and The Guardian. He has also appeared on NPR's "Talk of the Nation," MSNBC's "Rachel Maddow Show," Air America Radio's "Sam Seder Show," and XM Radio's "POTUS '08."


Americans Lack Economic Literacy; Some Hold "Insane" Views on Stimulus Spending
According to pollsters.
November 20, 2009.
Why Fiscal Conservatives Should Love the Senate Health Care Bill
If our political landscape were slightly saner, Republicans would embrace this bill with both arms.
November 19, 2009.
Rep. Virginia Foxx Credits GOP for Civil Rights Legislation
Wow.
November 19, 2009.
GOP Lawmakers Accuse Holder of Being a Terrorist Sympathizer
Holder literally burst out laughing when confronted with this absurd line of questioning.
November 19, 2009.
Yet More Mind-Bending Racism From the Right-Wing Media
This time it's Washington Times editor Wesley Pruden. And it's pretty shocking.
November 18, 2009.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
A Permanent Democrat
Posted by: ellspouses on Nov 6, 2009 2:28 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Indiana, and while I am registered as a Democrat, over the years I have voted for both Republican and Democrat candidates for various offices, based upon who I thought was the best candidate for the given position.
No more. I have reached a point where I have nothing but contempt for the entire Republican party. Not just those who spew and spout the goofiness and vile that some of them do, but also for those who stand by without taking any kind of stand against their fellow members and their mean-spirited, often stupid stances.
So, while in the past I have tended to support Sen. Dick Lugar, if he chooses to run again he will not receive my vote. The same for any other Republican candidates for office who seek my vote and wish to represent me. In my opinion, if the people in office can't get a handle on the mean and hateful in their party, how can I expect them to represent me on any issue?
There is value in an active, intelligent 2 party system. What we see today is a badly broken party. Until and unless the leadership of the Republican party grows a spine I imagine they will hearing the sentiment of more and more voters like me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Permanent Democrat Posted by: desertlakes
unemploymnet extended for record time thank goddess
Posted by: whealeydj on Nov 14, 2009 2:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my wife has been on unemployment insurance off and on for 20 months. unemployment insurance has helped us keep our heads above water just barely,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]