Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Mail Is A Fundamental Right

Posted by Bean , Lawyers, Guns and Money at 4:27 AM on April 16, 2008.


Didn't we even let the Nazis at Nuremberg have their mail?

One more way that the criminal (in)justice system is whittling away at the small pleasures in life for the incarcerated in a Florida county: now their loved ones have to write extra teeny tiny. That's because now, based on a new directive, they will only be allowed to receive postcards. No S.W.A.K. allowed.

Here's more:

Pictures will have to be printed on postcards, and envelopes won’t be allowed, unless they contain legal correspondence.

Capt. Tom Eberhardt, assistant commander of corrections services, said the new policy is in response to the biohazard threat that locked down Charlotte County Jail last month when a mail clerk fell ill after opening a letter containing a white powdered substance.

“That’s happening more and more in the country because of the times we’re living in,” Eberhardt said. “We’re doing this for the safety and security of the staff and the inmates.”

As acallidryas says in her post (linked above), this is a serious overreaction. There's no indication that the white powder was a biohazard and the jail has already strengthened its mail-checking procedures. For many people, the letters from home and the pictures contained in them are the most frequent and strongest connection to home. Nevermind that many incarcerated men and women participate in correspondence courses (how's THAT going work?).

Beyond being just plain silly, the program helps ensure that recidivism rates will remain high. How? Well, it's commonly accepted that people who return home to a family or other community support are less likely to reoffend. The harder it becomes for people to stay in meaningful touch with those family members, the harder it will be for them to reconnect with family upon community re-entry.

The Second Chance Act (signed into law last week) is a great step. But what happens between that first chance and the second one matters a whole lot too.

Digg!

Bean is a third-year law student in New York City. Her blogging focuses on the intersections of criminal justice, reproductive rights, gender equality, and drug policy.


The Drug War: Still Racist After All These Years
The drug war is still being waged only on some people and on some drugs. In other words, it's still a racist crock.
May 9, 2008.
Americans Like To Throw Each Other In Prison
Why do our incarceration rates top the rest of the world's?
April 25, 2008.
Knocked Up? Your Job Might Be on the Line
The rise in pregnancy discrimination is further evidence of how little our society values women as equal citizens.
March 28, 2008.
Are Harvard Men Sidelined by Sharia?
Harvard has instituted a women-only gym hour to accommodate Muslim women, and conservatives are calling it "discrimination" against Ivy League men.
March 13, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Human Rights issue?
Posted by: Dianka on Apr 16, 2008 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is irrationally counter-productive, at best. Is this in violation of internationally established human rights? Human rights is an area where the US has fallen far behind other nations over the past few decades, refusing to ratify the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and utterly disregarding the fundamental human rights of citizens and foreigners alike. I've noticed that, as it was in the Soviet Union during the Stalin years, the more our government violates fundamental human rights, the louder it crows about the US being a "leader" in human rights protections.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ok, I'm far more "anti-criminal" than most progressives
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 16, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will admit that up front. I'm even in favor of the proper use of the death penalty (which has a lot of progressives suggesting that it should be used on me, merely for holding that position).

But this "postcards only" concept?

That is moronic. There are ways of making the mail safe, and still allowing the use of envelopes.

It's mail. It's correspondance courses, the one way that the rare inmate that actually cares about being rehabilitated, can choose to do so.

This is something we should encourage, and this moronic over-reaction doesn't do so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The real "why"
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Apr 16, 2008 7:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These power maniacs do EVERYTHING they can to perpetuate a large prison population.
Why? NOT because there are criminals butt, for job security.
Just as cops do NOT truly want crime to go dwon, these creeps are in it for the money.

Recidivsim=moneeeeeyyyyyyyyyyyy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The real "why" Posted by: rickiey
No. No, it's not.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Apr 16, 2008 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After you rape someone, or deprive them of their security, your "right" to freely interact with other's is altered.

That's the consequence of denying others their rights.

Actions have consequences in the real world, AM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No. No, it's not. Posted by: rinthy
BULL____ I KNOW ONE BLACK PERSON IN OKLAHOMA THAT NEVER RECEIVES ANY MAIL
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Apr 23, 2008 11:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hasn't already been opened. We have every reason to believe that the KKK inside the US postal system is doing it. The Bush administration has over seen the largest growth of the KKK in at least 50 years. It suddenly is no longer illegal to be KKK. He is too busy hunting terrorists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]