Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Are Blogs Evaluating What the Candidates' Wives Wear?

Posted by Bean , Lawyers, Guns and Money at 6:40 AM on February 7, 2008.


The emphasis on on political wives' election-wear has some feminist bloggers seeing red.

Over at Slate, the XX factor team is dissecting the wardrobe choices of the candidates' wives last night (what color tie was Bill Clinton wearing? Anyone? Bueller?). They've honed in on Cindy McCain and Michelle Obama's choice of a red suit. Here's what Dana Stevens had to say:

To wear [red] is to quote [Nancy Reagan] as unambiguously as McCain evoked the Reagan/Stallone '80s by marching onstage to the Rocky theme for his victory speech. Michelle Obama's donning of the hue is more complex. Obviously, this choice is supposed to recall the general optimism of the morning-in-America days. But is it also meant to reassure us that Michelle, who only last year left her high-powered job as an executive at the University of Chicago hospitals, will remain safely on the Nancy-esque sidelines when her husband becomes president, confining her role to charity work like the cleft-palate foundation whose board Cindy McCain serves on (and through which she adopted their now-16-year-old daughter from Bangladesh)? At any rate, the color-coded association of both women with the ultimate loyal-but-silent political spouse clearly serves to distance them from a certain prospective first husband who doesn't need to wear loud colors to get himself noticed.

Uh. Color me confused (bad pun intended), but I didn't think that Nancy Reagan had claimed ownership rights over the R in Roy G. Biv. I think Stevens is right that the red may be intended to bring to mind optimism. At least in the case of Mrs. Obama, I'm guessing it's also supposed to evoke energy and excitement, rather than the staid same-ol'. But, seriously, since when are we relying on the "neighborhood astrologer's" positive associations with red as the jumping off point for a discussion about presidential politics and PR? And why is it that we assume that Michelle Obama is invoking Nancy Reagan (whose politics she probably couldn't disagree with more), while Hillary Clinton is evoking...something else unnamed...when she wears red?

Perhaps what got my blood boiling more than anything about this exchange was the assumption that Barack Obama wants his wife to take on a Nancy Reagan-esque role, or that she would be willing to. Sure, she cut her hours at her high-power hospital job last year, but my guess is that had more to do with the rigors of campaigning than with her desire to be perceived as a dutiful, even Stepford-like, wife. I usually really like XX factor, but this back and forth felt like just another "woman's" blog playing into exactly the assumptions and stereotypes it should be challenging.

Digg!

Bean is a third-year law student in New York City. Her blogging focuses on the intersections of criminal justice, reproductive rights, gender equality, and drug policy.


The Drug War: Still Racist After All These Years
The drug war is still being waged only on some people and on some drugs. In other words, it's still a racist crock.
May 9, 2008.
Americans Like To Throw Each Other In Prison
Why do our incarceration rates top the rest of the world's?
April 25, 2008.
Mail Is A Fundamental Right
Didn't we even let the Nazis at Nuremberg have their mail?
April 16, 2008.
Knocked Up? Your Job Might Be on the Line
The rise in pregnancy discrimination is further evidence of how little our society values women as equal citizens.
March 28, 2008.
Are Harvard Men Sidelined by Sharia?
Harvard has instituted a women-only gym hour to accommodate Muslim women, and conservatives are calling it "discrimination" against Ivy League men.
March 13, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Can we all get with the program?!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Feb 7, 2008 8:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're facing a tanking economy, peak oil, an overheating world, an endless war in Iraq, the shredding of the Constitution, creeping dictatorship and on and on, but bloggers are concerned with what the candidates' wives are wearing?!?!

This "American Idol-Dancing With the Stars" mentality troubles me deeply, because, as bloggers are closer to vox populi, it indicates that the media's campaign to dumb down America has been successful, and the compass needles in people's brains are directionless, spinning wildly, not knowing what to point to.

It is easy to say, and somewhat accurate, that a population gets the government it deserves; however, the last seven years have demonstrated how much suffering can result. Are we Pavlovian subjects unable to learn even THAT lesson?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe it's because...
Posted by: oregoncharles on Feb 7, 2008 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The candidates are so poor, and so close together on positions, that there isn't much else to talk about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hey, wait a minute!
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Feb 7, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wear red on occasion, and look damn good in it. Am I trying to channel Nacy Reagan, too?

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]