Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Women Don't Leave Their Privacy Rights at the Jailhouse Door

Posted by Bean , Lawyers, Guns and Money at 9:48 AM on January 30, 2008.


A circuit court has ruled that female inmates must have access to abortion services, but violations of incarcerated women's rights continue.

It's not often that I get to write about good news with regard to the American criminal (in)justice system. But today is one of those rare days.

Late last week, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a Missouri District Court's holding that the state prison system is required to provide transportation for pregnant incarcerated women who want abortions. The decision overturns Governor Matt Blunt's policy of denying pregnant inmates access to abortion services by refusing to transport them to St. Louis for the procedure. (About 7% of incarcerated women are pregnant at the time of their sentencing; many more become pregnant during their incarceration by guards who sexually assault and rape them or by intimate partners who visit).

While the 8th Circuit rejected the district court's finding that the policy amounted to cruel & unusual punishment, the court affirmed the district court's holding that Gov. Blunt's policy violated the constitutional rights of women inmates by placing an undue burden on their right to abortion. As the lawyer who represented the pseudonymous plaintiff (together with the ACLU) explained, "abortion is not a right that is lost at the jailhouse door."

How true. My challenge to so-called pro-life governors like Gov. Blunt who don't like having to provide access to abortion for their incarcerated women: show us you actually have a modicum of concern about life (and not just the politics of it) and ban the use of shackles on pregnant and laboring women.

Digg!

Bean is a third-year law student in New York City. Her blogging focuses on the intersections of criminal justice, reproductive rights, gender equality, and drug policy.


The Drug War: Still Racist After All These Years
The drug war is still being waged only on some people and on some drugs. In other words, it's still a racist crock.
May 9, 2008.
Americans Like To Throw Each Other In Prison
Why do our incarceration rates top the rest of the world's?
April 25, 2008.
Mail Is A Fundamental Right
Didn't we even let the Nazis at Nuremberg have their mail?
April 16, 2008.
Knocked Up? Your Job Might Be on the Line
The rise in pregnancy discrimination is further evidence of how little our society values women as equal citizens.
March 28, 2008.
Are Harvard Men Sidelined by Sharia?
Harvard has instituted a women-only gym hour to accommodate Muslim women, and conservatives are calling it "discrimination" against Ivy League men.
March 13, 2008.

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The only surprise here will be if the ruling actually changes anything
Posted by: TheLimit on Jan 30, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forcing women to bear children is considered in this country to be an acceptable way to punish them for having a sex life when they are poor - and if they happen to break any laws which expose them to incarceration, they can not only be forced to bear, but their children removed immediately at birth.

That'll teach them, for sure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]