Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

House Report: Abramoff's White House Connections

Posted by GottaLaff , The Political Carnival at 2:02 PM on June 9, 2008.


A new report confirms the obvious - Abramoff had undue influence in the White House, including with Bush.
abramoff
abramoff

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

Got a tip for a post?:
Email us | Anonymous form

Get GottaLaff in your
mailbox!

 

Wow. Am. I. Surprised.

A House panel on Monday released a proposed report saying that disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff “influenced some White House actions.”

The proposed report, compiled by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said, “Abramoff and his associates had access and influenced some actions at the White House.”
The Moustache of Justice is at it again. Go get 'em Waxman! Now. Somebody start talking. What's that? Something about the Fifth Amendment? Again? This is getting really old.

The document states that the probe was “limited by potential Fifth Amendment claims by several White House officials and Abramoff lobbyists and the committee’s accommodation of Justice Department concerns.”

I am showing an enormous amount of self control right now. I am not screaming. I am not sticking forks into my eyes. ::deep breath:: So. How often did Abramoff talk to Bush?

The investigation also showed that “Abramoff had personal contact with President Bush, that high-level White House officials held Mr. Abramoff and his associates in high regard and solicited recommendations from Mr. Abramoff on policy matters …”

Which policy matters? Which policy matters? When? How often? I want specifics!

The proposed report was issued by committee Chairman Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and ranking Republican Tom Davis (Va.). According to the document, the investigation unveiled that the “White House failed to provide public accountability regarding its relationship with Jack Abramoff.”

Sigh. Tell us something we don't know. In fact, tell us everything.

Digg!


McCain Campaign is Stacking Townhalls
No dissenters allowed.
June 13, 2008.
Reid: Lieberman's Chairmanship is Safe
Reid capitulates to Lieberman.
June 5, 2008.
The End of the Hummer Era?
GM is closing four plants and considering selling the Hummer brand.
June 3, 2008.
Is Obama Ahead in Pennsylvania?
He leads across all age groups except senior citizens and balances Clinton’s 10 point lead with women with his own 15 point lead with men.
April 2, 2008.
Advertisement
Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Every White House Official...
Posted by: Quannah on Jun 10, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
has, basically, flipped-off the American people, as well as the Congress.

Something's got to give. When the entire Executive Branch refuses to answer questions before Congressional Committees (including answering subpoenas), and the entire Justice Department refuses to launch any criminal investigations into the wrongdoing of this administration, what can be done, if anything?

Are we left with waiting until there is a Democrat in the White House and a new Justice Department that is more interested in upholding the law of the land than keeping political cronies out of prison? This is so disgraceful!

The Republics cannot be allowed to continue to run amok. It will be the downfall of this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]