COMMENTS: 116
My Womb for God's Purposes: The Perils of Unassisted Childbirth in the Quiverfull Movement
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Belief headlines via email.
In the last week of June, two different circles of blogs invested in the Quiverfull movement—both as critics and supporters of the pro-natalist, patriarchal, conservative Christian lifestyle—focused on the sad news of the death of one Quiverfull mother’s child shortly after birth. The woman was Carri Chmielewski, author of the now-private blog “Carri Me Away,” where she described her Quiverfull lifestyle, eschewing contraception, having as many children as God gave her, submitting to her husband’s leadership, and, in a related conviction common among Quiverfull adherents, her plans to deliver her children through unassisted childbirth—a home birth with no doctors, nurses, or midwives to help her and her husband through labor and aftercare.
For weeks, Chmielewski’s plans drew the scrutiny and concern of Quiverfull critics, such as the commenters on the wryly-named ”Free Jinger” forum, a discussion board dedicated to “freeing” Jinger Duggar, one of the daughters of the Quiverfull Duggar family featured on reality TV show 18 Kids and Counting. Commenters there and elsewhere followed news of Chmielewski’s pregnancy, at first with light snark directed at this exemplar of Quiverfull conviction, and then growing concern as Chmielewski described mounting complications: she reportedly measured much larger than expected for a normal pregnancy and discussed her own doubts and misgivings about going through with the unassisted birth.
Because of these worries, Chmielewski sought the opinion of a certified professional midwife (a class of midwife distinct from certified nurse midwives, who have extensive medical training) from Central Indiana Home Birth Midwives. According to retired OB-GYN blogger Amy Tuteur, the midwife told Chmielewski that she was carrying twins, and maintained her diagnosis despite an ultrasound that only revealed one fetus, claiming that one twin was “hiding” behind the other. As Chmielewski was nearly three weeks past her due date, the midwife advised her to wait; when the baby was born, Chmielewski suffered amniotic fluid embolus (a rare condition that can occur in hospital births as well), causing the child, Benaiah, to die, and the mother to survive in critical condition.
At Salon’s Broadsheet blog and the Free Jinger forums, commenters weighed on whether the death constituted actionable child neglect, in the model of Christian Scientists—or the recent case involving the Nemenhah Band—refusing medical care for their children. Chmielewski’s husband, who critics charge has erased or hidden much of his wife’s past writing, described her survival as a miracle of God, who spared her even as He took their son.
Where Quiverfull Meets New Age
The tragedy in the Chmielewski family also prompted other discussion of the role that unassisted childbirth has within the Quiverfull movement. Vyckie Garrison, a former Quiverfull follower who writes about leaving the movement at the blog “No Longer Quivering,” described her own experiences with unattended home births, including one that ended in the emergency room after Garrison suffered a partial uterine rupture.
“Like you,” Garrison wrote in an open letter to Chmielewski, “I held to a firm conviction that children are a blessing from the Lord and I strongly desired to have as many blessings as He chose to send my way. Faced with the very real possibility of half a dozen or more pregnancies in my future, I was highly motivated to diligently seek out the very safest—least expensive, traumatic, painful, and unpleasant birthing options available.”
Garrison described a path taken by many other Quiverfull women, who progress further into the movement, first forswearing contraception and then hospitals, picking up additional, related convictions as part of an all-encompassing “home lifestyle” independent of what they consider the tyranny of outside “experts,” whether in medicine, the education system, or denominational leadership. Chmielewski’s description of herself in signing her online writing, “Homeschooler, Homebirther, Homechurcher,” is an apt summary of the lifestyle: one of deeply interwoven home industries, where a family is reliant on itself to as great an extent as possible, but ultimately always reliant on God.
Stay up to date with the latest Belief headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lily H. on Jul 23, 2009 2:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: Jaipurr
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: Cynic13
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: LindaB
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: illit
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: cberkland
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: illit
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: TennMom
» Large Families
Posted by: Arlene
» RE: Large Families
Posted by: illit
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Jul 23, 2009 3:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Read Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale"
Posted by: Changling
» so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: babs
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: cberkland
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: Arlene
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: illit
» Never Was
Posted by: Arlene
» RE: Subject to Social Services investigations?
Posted by: Janey Mack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: meadowsage on Jul 23, 2009 4:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also be careful of the slippery slope one can go down if we start making people surrender to medical procedures against their will. There is so much greed and corruption in the medical establishment that there are often good reasons to refuse what they're offering.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Difference
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Difference
Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: Difference
Posted by: kjoyce
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Janet Kay on Jul 23, 2009 4:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Child birth is not a disease but we should also use all available knowledge so this miracle can happen as safely as possible. Best in my opinion is having a baby home with the medical bus sitting outside waiting just in case it is needed. I believe they have something like that in England? But most Americans have so little regard for women and children I can't see that happening. For the most part it is a very macho existence here in the good ole boy USA. Football is treated with more respect than procreation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So Extreme!
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: So Extreme!
Posted by: Janet Kay
» health care access
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erik1968 on Jul 23, 2009 4:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My friends were featured in NYT for unassisted birth. It works just fine.
http://is.gd/1INvN
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry about the shortened URL
Posted by: Erik1968
» RE: Sorry about the shortened URL
Posted by: cplot
» RE: ight to privacy
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: It works just fine, when it works, free choice!
Posted by: Changling
» RE: ight to privacy
Posted by: babs
» It works just fine
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: ight to privacy
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annarisse on Jul 23, 2009 4:46 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think home birth is an admirable thing and midwives are a fine option to have. I wish every state would start licensing midwives for home or hospital/birth centre births. But unassisted childbirth is ridiculous. Nobody has ever lived this way if they could help it - women have always had attendants for childbirth. While going it alone might work some of the time, on the whole, it's far riskier than a medically assisted home birth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Charge them? Yes!
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Charge them? No.
Posted by: mandiwrite
» RE: Charge them? No.
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Charge them? No.
Posted by: Kati
» 'unassisted': you might consider that family or friend female help
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cberkland on Jul 23, 2009 4:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» As Ron White Sez "ya can't fix stupid" and these people are stupid.
Posted by: bitsfick
» RE: Stupid
Posted by: terradea42
» RE: Stupid
Posted by: dmaciewski
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GPFrank on Jul 23, 2009 5:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
investing objects of his creation with horrible diseases such as Tourette's syndrome, Alzheimer and multiple myoma
creating holocausts from time to time such as
starting with the rampages such as by the Gideonites
and yet tries to terrify you with that fiction of his, Satan if you don't comply and give your soul to him.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: God is a psychopath
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: God is a psychopath
Posted by: mhhd
» RE: God is a mirror to you, look deeply into the abyss...
Posted by: Changling
» RE: God is a psychopath
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jul 23, 2009 5:36 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In certain rural sections of the South, illegitimate and/or unwanted children are butchered and fed to the family in stews. Not every nutcase is as Christian as s/he appears.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» baby stew?
Posted by: aislinnluv
» Documentation please! Without it you appear to be the nut. nm
Posted by: Timba
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cdlepthien on Jul 23, 2009 6:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: These people are
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kww355 on Jul 23, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The followers of this cult may have a quiverfull but their heads are empty.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: katusha on Jul 23, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:You do have it
Posted by: Changling
» RE: I don't get it Yes you do
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I don't get it
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Jul 23, 2009 7:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ps.127
[0] A Song of Ascents. Of Solomon.
[1] Unless the LORD builds the house,
those who build it labor in vain.
Unless the LORD watches over the city,
the watchman stays awake in vain.
[2] It is in vain that you rise up early
and go late to rest,
eating the bread of anxious toil;
for he gives to his beloved sleep.
[3] Lo, sons are a heritage from the LORD,
the fruit of the womb a reward.
[4] Like arrows in the hand of a warrior
are the sons of one's youth.
[5] Happy is the man who has
his quiver full of them!
He shall not be put to shame
when he speaks with his enemies in the gate.
In the first place, it mentions only sons, and "the sons of one's youth." Not children conceived as long as possible, as many times as possible, just "the sons of one's youth." And this part intrigues me: "[2] It is in vain that you rise up early and go late to rest, eating the bread of anxious toil; for he gives to his beloved sleep." I wonder how much the mother of more than, say, 4 kids gets to obey THAT part of the Psalm! Maybe these women should actually look up the verses that are imposed upon them. But it does seem as if Bible study is more meant to control what a person sees and doesn't see rather than to educate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Easy explanation
Posted by: kww355
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Jul 23, 2009 7:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...a firm conviction that children are a blessing from the Lord and I strongly desired to have as many blessings as He chose to send my way.."
-------------------------
Um...based on this premise, shouldn't the woman simply sit and wait for the Spirit of the Lord to inseminate her?
Instead her Master, sorry I mean. husband jumps her bones every nine months or so for his carnal pleasure - or is he claiming to get a go ahead from God to act on his behalf?
Sounds like a rapist's excuse...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 23, 2009 8:32 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the hell would God want women to avoid heath care & take unnecessary risks in childbirth???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If these cultists believe in God, they should realize God also gave us brains & common sense, yet...
Posted by: illit
» RE: If these cultists believe in God, they should realize God also gave us brains & common sense, yet...
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 23, 2009 8:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» trust me, anna, hosptials DO NOT "report everything", nor..
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WomanRebel on Jul 23, 2009 8:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further we should encourage remaining child free by giving a large payment to anyone willing to be sterilized as well as an annual tax break.
The women engaged in this movement are mentally ill. There needs to be a DSM entry for this form of masochistic slave like behavior.
Raising children in this Christ-Fascist cult lifestyle is perverted and sick.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree completely but with one caveat
Posted by: kww355
» RE: No Tax Breaks for More Than Two Children
Posted by: babs
» RE: No Tax Breaks for More Than Two Children
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grindermonkey on Jul 23, 2009 9:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Unnatural selection, the crule to rule others survive.
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abrunvand on Jul 23, 2009 10:00 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a fetus were legally defined as a "person" then abortions, miscarriage or still birth could all be prosecuted as a "crime", and any birth that goes wrong, even in a hospital, could wind up with someone accused of murder. So the choice to birth unassisted at home and the choice to end a pregnancy by abortion are just different aspects of a woman's right to chose.
In any case, the neonatal death rate in the U.s. was 6.7 per 1000 live births in 2006, and here's what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has to say about that statistic: The U.S. infant mortality rate is higher than those in most other developed countries, and the gap between the U.S. infant mortality rate and the rates for the countries with the lowest infant mortality appears to be widening.
In other words, the "Quverfull" women are not just being paranoid-- U.S. Hospitals really are not doing such a stellar job of care for childbirth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One Disagreement
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: One Disagreement
Posted by: Kati
» not to mention the potential of contracting...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: juniorantique on Jul 23, 2009 10:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marj on Jul 23, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bkochandco on Jul 23, 2009 12:07 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Unfortunately, It Won't Work
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Unfortunately, It Won't Work
Posted by: illit
» RE: I'm a Darwinist on this one - NO
Posted by: illit
» RE: I'm a Darwinist on this one
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jul 23, 2009 12:20 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what would the author's and alternet's reaction have been had this woman been a feminist opposed to the "medicalizing" and "masculinizing" of child birth - that is the wresting of midwifery from women at home and putting it in the hands of male doctors in the hosptial - rather than a "religious fanatic"? (i've known feminist "natural birthers" who have gone weeks past their due dates, too.)
what would the response have been had this woman simply had no insurance and therefore failed to obtain prenatal care and subsequently delivered at home? What of a woman's alleged reproductive choice?? Doesn't this woman have the right to choose, too??
truth of the matter is MOST births (at home or in a medical setting) go just fine...the reason women go to hospitals in this day and age is the "what if" factor...and yes, in labor & delivery when things go south they go south FAST...so, IF things go badly, you do want to be in the hospital or other medical setting...but that doesn't change the fact that MOST births go just fine...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» most excellent comment
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» So what about pre-natal care?
Posted by: bbq
» RE: VERY misleading article...
Posted by: babs
» RE: VERY misleading article...
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Jul 23, 2009 3:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jul 23, 2009 3:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: illit
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» Off on a tangent
Posted by: BlueTigress
» What Choice?
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnmont on Jul 23, 2009 4:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SalB on Jul 23, 2009 11:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They made their bed....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mushipeas on Jul 24, 2009 9:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And TLC has multiple shows glorifying large families... If we were still a farming population it might not be so strange but when you're having kids (four average families worth) just because 'god' said so, when there are literally children without homes starving...it just amazes me. I struggle with whether I ought to have two kids solely because I consider it part of my responsibility to take care of my fellow man/woman... Yes, I'm referring here to that little problem called overpopulation, maybe not today...but it's only our species growing not the existing landmass which supports us.
And then I think should I just have a brood of rational children to procreate and out-compete the crazies, or is that irrational?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is Why I Refuse to Watch TLC, and You Should, Too
Posted by: dudelette
Comments are closed-
Posted by: illit on Jul 24, 2009 1:13 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
must make them feel big.
Seems a tad odd or Oedipal --
What I don't understand is why women of even the least bit of 'mind' put up with this?????
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ahimsa on Jul 24, 2009 4:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the premise of the death of a "child", right?
How about if they let a real chIld die out of negligence and ignorance?
How is this treated by the law?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm sorry
Posted by: Ahimsa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LT on Jul 24, 2009 6:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not a 60 minutes piece (although there certainly is enough info to investigate for a good sized segment) but I'm glad that the issue is gaining local attention!
Bottom line - while not all CPM are morons, the ones in this case are - and they belong in jail!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 28, 2009 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jul 30, 2009 1:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a lib and libertarian I just think they should all do whatever they want, as long as I don't have to pay for it. EG, I don't like paying for their killing in Iraq for nothing other than corporate/oil profits. And yet they take my tax dollars away from me for their corporate wars of profit.
Next they will want to take my tax dollars from me for their theological wars.
As a lib and libertarian if they want to put their lives or their fetuses lives on the line that is their "right of privacy" to do that. But when my nieces and nephews have babies they wil go to a hospital and I'll support/ encourage that.
My grandmother was a midwife back in Italy but that was from a different time, more than 100yrs ago.
All I ask of these strange Repub groups(Quiverfull, neo-nazis, neo-confederates, etc) is that they just leave me and our nation alone.
But when strange religion is hooked up with strange economic principles that has become and is still a very dangerous mixture for our nation. Less than a hundred years ago this same conflation allowed the nazis and the fascists to receive a religious blessing, an imprimatur. As a result some 60 million people died, including the near genocide of some 6 million Jews. Never again!!! NEVER AGAIN!!! Once was far to many. Too many people looked the other way and it happened. But, never again.
The Repub party are the nazis of today. If we let our guard down WWII will happen again. WE'll have yet another war for economics and religion. And Satan will rise again. It will be called WWIII(in the ME) or WWIV(with Europe) or WWV(with Russia).
If we let our guard down the GOP, war mongers, haters, the Religious Right and the endlessly greedy will convince us that it is another "just war".
They did it before, and guaranteed, they'll do it again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bluraysoft on Aug 4, 2009 8:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kagyhelen on Aug 11, 2009 7:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boay on Aug 17, 2009 6:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lily H. on Jul 23, 2009 2:53 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: Jaipurr
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: Cynic13
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: LindaB
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: illit
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: cberkland
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: illit
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: TennMom
» Large Families
Posted by: Arlene
» RE: Large Families
Posted by: illit
» RE: The Duggar Family...
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LeonBNJ on Jul 23, 2009 3:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Read Margaret Atwood's "The Handmaid's Tale"
Posted by: Changling
» so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: babs
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: cberkland
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: Arlene
» RE: so if a woman makes a PERSONAL choice, she's a criminal?
Posted by: illit
» Never Was
Posted by: Arlene
» RE: Subject to Social Services investigations?
Posted by: Janey Mack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: meadowsage on Jul 23, 2009 4:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also be careful of the slippery slope one can go down if we start making people surrender to medical procedures against their will. There is so much greed and corruption in the medical establishment that there are often good reasons to refuse what they're offering.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Difference
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Difference
Posted by: dmaciewski
» RE: Difference
Posted by: kjoyce
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Janet Kay on Jul 23, 2009 4:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Child birth is not a disease but we should also use all available knowledge so this miracle can happen as safely as possible. Best in my opinion is having a baby home with the medical bus sitting outside waiting just in case it is needed. I believe they have something like that in England? But most Americans have so little regard for women and children I can't see that happening. For the most part it is a very macho existence here in the good ole boy USA. Football is treated with more respect than procreation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: So Extreme!
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: So Extreme!
Posted by: Janet Kay
» health care access
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erik1968 on Jul 23, 2009 4:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My friends were featured in NYT for unassisted birth. It works just fine.
http://is.gd/1INvN
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Sorry about the shortened URL
Posted by: Erik1968
» RE: Sorry about the shortened URL
Posted by: cplot
» RE: ight to privacy
Posted by: Annarisse
» RE: It works just fine, when it works, free choice!
Posted by: Changling
» RE: ight to privacy
Posted by: babs
» It works just fine
Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: ight to privacy
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Annarisse on Jul 23, 2009 4:46 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think home birth is an admirable thing and midwives are a fine option to have. I wish every state would start licensing midwives for home or hospital/birth centre births. But unassisted childbirth is ridiculous. Nobody has ever lived this way if they could help it - women have always had attendants for childbirth. While going it alone might work some of the time, on the whole, it's far riskier than a medically assisted home birth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Charge them? Yes!
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Charge them? No.
Posted by: mandiwrite
» RE: Charge them? No.
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Charge them? No.
Posted by: Kati
» 'unassisted': you might consider that family or friend female help
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cberkland on Jul 23, 2009 4:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» As Ron White Sez "ya can't fix stupid" and these people are stupid.
Posted by: bitsfick
» RE: Stupid
Posted by: terradea42
» RE: Stupid
Posted by: dmaciewski
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GPFrank on Jul 23, 2009 5:21 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
investing objects of his creation with horrible diseases such as Tourette's syndrome, Alzheimer and multiple myoma
creating holocausts from time to time such as
starting with the rampages such as by the Gideonites
and yet tries to terrify you with that fiction of his, Satan if you don't comply and give your soul to him.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: God is a psychopath
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: God is a psychopath
Posted by: mhhd
» RE: God is a mirror to you, look deeply into the abyss...
Posted by: Changling
» RE: God is a psychopath
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: littlepitcher on Jul 23, 2009 5:36 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In certain rural sections of the South, illegitimate and/or unwanted children are butchered and fed to the family in stews. Not every nutcase is as Christian as s/he appears.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» baby stew?
Posted by: aislinnluv
» Documentation please! Without it you appear to be the nut. nm
Posted by: Timba
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cdlepthien on Jul 23, 2009 6:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: These people are
Posted by: babs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kww355 on Jul 23, 2009 6:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The followers of this cult may have a quiverfull but their heads are empty.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: katusha on Jul 23, 2009 6:38 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:You do have it
Posted by: Changling
» RE: I don't get it Yes you do
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I don't get it
Posted by: theblackgeorgecarlin
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Jul 23, 2009 7:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ps.127
[0] A Song of Ascents. Of Solomon.
[1] Unless the LORD builds the house,
those who build it labor in vain.
Unless the LORD watches over the city,
the watchman stays awake in vain.
[2] It is in vain that you rise up early
and go late to rest,
eating the bread of anxious toil;
for he gives to his beloved sleep.
[3] Lo, sons are a heritage from the LORD,
the fruit of the womb a reward.
[4] Like arrows in the hand of a warrior
are the sons of one's youth.
[5] Happy is the man who has
his quiver full of them!
He shall not be put to shame
when he speaks with his enemies in the gate.
In the first place, it mentions only sons, and "the sons of one's youth." Not children conceived as long as possible, as many times as possible, just "the sons of one's youth." And this part intrigues me: "[2] It is in vain that you rise up early and go late to rest, eating the bread of anxious toil; for he gives to his beloved sleep." I wonder how much the mother of more than, say, 4 kids gets to obey THAT part of the Psalm! Maybe these women should actually look up the verses that are imposed upon them. But it does seem as if Bible study is more meant to control what a person sees and doesn't see rather than to educate.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Easy explanation
Posted by: kww355
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zipper696 on Jul 23, 2009 7:16 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...a firm conviction that children are a blessing from the Lord and I strongly desired to have as many blessings as He chose to send my way.."
-------------------------
Um...based on this premise, shouldn't the woman simply sit and wait for the Spirit of the Lord to inseminate her?
Instead her Master, sorry I mean. husband jumps her bones every nine months or so for his carnal pleasure - or is he claiming to get a go ahead from God to act on his behalf?
Sounds like a rapist's excuse...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JohnTruth2001 on Jul 23, 2009 8:32 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the hell would God want women to avoid heath care & take unnecessary risks in childbirth???
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If these cultists believe in God, they should realize God also gave us brains & common sense, yet...
Posted by: illit
» RE: If these cultists believe in God, they should realize God also gave us brains & common sense, yet...
Posted by: illit
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 23, 2009 8:35 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» trust me, anna, hosptials DO NOT "report everything", nor..
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WomanRebel on Jul 23, 2009 8:51 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further we should encourage remaining child free by giving a large payment to anyone willing to be sterilized as well as an annual tax break.
The women engaged in this movement are mentally ill. There needs to be a DSM entry for this form of masochistic slave like behavior.
Raising children in this Christ-Fascist cult lifestyle is perverted and sick.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I agree completely but with one caveat
Posted by: kww355
» RE: No Tax Breaks for More Than Two Children
Posted by: babs
» RE: No Tax Breaks for More Than Two Children
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: grindermonkey on Jul 23, 2009 9:25 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Unnatural selection, the crule to rule others survive.
Posted by: Changling
Comments are closed-
Posted by: abrunvand on Jul 23, 2009 10:00 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a fetus were legally defined as a "person" then abortions, miscarriage or still birth could all be prosecuted as a "crime", and any birth that goes wrong, even in a hospital, could wind up with someone accused of murder. So the choice to birth unassisted at home and the choice to end a pregnancy by abortion are just different aspects of a woman's right to chose.
In any case, the neonatal death rate in the U.s. was 6.7 per 1000 live births in 2006, and here's what the U.S. Centers for Disease Control has to say about that statistic: The U.S. infant mortality rate is higher than those in most other developed countries, and the gap between the U.S. infant mortality rate and the rates for the countries with the lowest infant mortality appears to be widening.
In other words, the "Quverfull" women are not just being paranoid-- U.S. Hospitals really are not doing such a stellar job of care for childbirth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» One Disagreement
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: One Disagreement
Posted by: Kati
» not to mention the potential of contracting...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Comments are closed-
Posted by: juniorantique on Jul 23, 2009 10:12 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: marj on Jul 23, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bkochandco on Jul 23, 2009 12:07 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Unfortunately, It Won't Work
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Unfortunately, It Won't Work
Posted by: illit
» RE: I'm a Darwinist on this one - NO
Posted by: illit
» RE: I'm a Darwinist on this one
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Jul 23, 2009 12:20 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what would the author's and alternet's reaction have been had this woman been a feminist opposed to the "medicalizing" and "masculinizing" of child birth - that is the wresting of midwifery from women at home and putting it in the hands of male doctors in the hosptial - rather than a "religious fanatic"? (i've known feminist "natural birthers" who have gone weeks past their due dates, too.)
what would the response have been had this woman simply had no insurance and therefore failed to obtain prenatal care and subsequently delivered at home? What of a woman's alleged reproductive choice?? Doesn't this woman have the right to choose, too??
truth of the matter is MOST births (at home or in a medical setting) go just fine...the reason women go to hospitals in this day and age is the "what if" factor...and yes, in labor & delivery when things go south they go south FAST...so, IF things go badly, you do want to be in the hospital or other medical setting...but that doesn't change the fact that MOST births go just fine...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» most excellent comment
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» So what about pre-natal care?
Posted by: bbq
» RE: VERY misleading article...
Posted by: babs
» RE: VERY misleading article...
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: leafsong1 on Jul 23, 2009 3:21 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Jul 23, 2009 3:59 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: aislinnluv
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: illit
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: cplot
» Off on a tangent
Posted by: BlueTigress
» What Choice?
Posted by: dudelette
» RE: Whatever happend to choice?
Posted by: Kati
Comments are closed-
Posted by: johnmont on Jul 23, 2009 4:53 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SalB on Jul 23, 2009 11:05 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They made their bed....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mushipeas on Jul 24, 2009 9:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And TLC has multiple shows glorifying large families... If we were still a farming population it might not be so strange but when you're having kids (four average families worth) just because 'god' said so, when there are literally children without homes starving...it just amazes me. I struggle with whether I ought to have two kids solely because I consider it part of my responsibility to take care of my fellow man/woman... Yes, I'm referring here to that little problem called overpopulation, maybe not today...but it's only our species growing not the existing landmass which supports us.
And then I think should I just have a brood of rational children to procreate and out-compete the crazies, or is that irrational?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» This is Why I Refuse to Watch TLC, and You Should, Too
Posted by: dudelette
Comments are closed-
Posted by: illit on Jul 24, 2009 1:13 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
must make them feel big.
Seems a tad odd or Oedipal --
What I don't understand is why women of even the least bit of 'mind' put up with this?????
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ahimsa on Jul 24, 2009 4:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Under the premise of the death of a "child", right?
How about if they let a real chIld die out of negligence and ignorance?
How is this treated by the law?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I'm sorry
Posted by: Ahimsa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: LT on Jul 24, 2009 6:16 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not a 60 minutes piece (although there certainly is enough info to investigate for a good sized segment) but I'm glad that the issue is gaining local attention!
Bottom line - while not all CPM are morons, the ones in this case are - and they belong in jail!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: itouch backup on Jul 28, 2009 8:47 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jul 30, 2009 1:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a lib and libertarian I just think they should all do whatever they want, as long as I don't have to pay for it. EG, I don't like paying for their killing in Iraq for nothing other than corporate/oil profits. And yet they take my tax dollars away from me for their corporate wars of profit.
Next they will want to take my tax dollars from me for their theological wars.
As a lib and libertarian if they want to put their lives or their fetuses lives on the line that is their "right of privacy" to do that. But when my nieces and nephews have babies they wil go to a hospital and I'll support/ encourage that.
My grandmother was a midwife back in Italy but that was from a different time, more than 100yrs ago.
All I ask of these strange Repub groups(Quiverfull, neo-nazis, neo-confederates, etc) is that they just leave me and our nation alone.
But when strange religion is hooked up with strange economic principles that has become and is still a very dangerous mixture for our nation. Less than a hundred years ago this same conflation allowed the nazis and the fascists to receive a religious blessing, an imprimatur. As a result some 60 million people died, including the near genocide of some 6 million Jews. Never again!!! NEVER AGAIN!!! Once was far to many. Too many people looked the other way and it happened. But, never again.
The Repub party are the nazis of today. If we let our guard down WWII will happen again. WE'll have yet another war for economics and religion. And Satan will rise again. It will be called WWIII(in the ME) or WWIV(with Europe) or WWV(with Russia).
If we let our guard down the GOP, war mongers, haters, the Religious Right and the endlessly greedy will convince us that it is another "just war".
They did it before, and guaranteed, they'll do it again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bluraysoft on Aug 4, 2009 8:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kagyhelen on Aug 11, 2009 7:50 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: boay on Aug 17, 2009 6:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Why It's So Tricky for Atheists to Debate with Believers
7 Reasons for Atheists to Celebrate the Holidays
Hot, Steamy Mormons: Are the Latter Day Saints Getting Sexy?




