Bush's foreign policy -- including the plan to attack Iraq -- is not about fighting terrorism, but dreams of global dominance as revealed in a document leaked 10 years ago.
The army of media pundits, cabinet members, and military experts arrayed in favor of an attack on Iraq have one startling fact in common. Not one of them has a shred of wartime experience.
The simmering feud between Republican hawks and moderates over the planned attack on Iraq is finally coming to a boil. Come September, it may turn into a full-blown war.
European allies fear the White House's threat to withdraw from international peacekeeping operations is evidence of an agenda to put the U.S. beyond the reach of international law.
President Bush's policy address marks a resounding victory for Ariel Sharon and the pro-Likud faction -- and major setback for peace activists on either side of the conflict.
Human rights and death-penalty abolition groups hailed last week's landmark decision by the U.S. Supreme Court banning the execution of mentally disabled inmates.
As Israel invades the Palestinian territories, the Bush administration's respponse is being framed by two men who despise Yasser Arafat -- Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld.
A powerful group of neo-conservative war hawks is launching a bold new public relations campaign attacking anyone who disagrees with Bush's war on terrorism.
Posted on: Mar 6, 2002, Source: Inter Press Service
The U.S. is committing military forces to new hotspots at a dizzying pace. If recent casualties in Afghanistan are any indication, this headlong expansion may come at a high price.
If Kenneth Lay were put in charge of the war on terrorism, he would probably conduct it much the same way his fellow Texas oilman and beneficiary of Enron largesse, George W. Bush, has.
