Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Cruising to Destruction: Why the Leisure Industry Isn't all Fun and Games

By Kent Paterson, CorpWatch. Posted July 14, 2008.


Cruise business is booming at the expensive of the environment, local communities, their own workers, and even the safety of their customers.
Advertisement

Environmental and community activists in the Mexican Pacific resort of Zihuatanejo recently celebrated the cancellation of a cruise ship terminal that would have accommodated two thousand-foot "floating hotels" at once. Opponents feared a large pier on the town's main beach would contribute to bay pollution and ruin the quirky, small-town atmosphere that attracts return visitors year after year. For months, the People in Defense of the Bay coalition had staged protest rallies, posted online petitions and fired off letters to government officials -- including planners at the federal Ministry of Communications and Transportation (SCT).

Set on Zihuatanejo's main beach, the multi-story Casa Marina was a hotbed of activism. Banners and signs opposing a new pier draped the building that houses locally owned businesses as well as the Humane Society, where scraggly street cats and spooked pelicans are nursed back to health. Inside the edifice, merchant and green activist Natalia Rodriguez Krebs runs a store that offers eye-grabbing indigenous art, crafts and clothing.

Rodriguez and other locals have long received the cruise ships that anchor inside the bay one at a time, and shuttle passengers in small boats (known as tenders) to the existing pier where they run a gauntlet of day-tour operators. In the wake of the 9/11 attacks on the United States, Mexican marines guarding the municipal pier have joined the throng.

That is not the only influence that Washington's "war on terror" has exerted on this small Mexican town. Since international regulations drafted in the wake of 9/11 mandate that other boats maintain a fixed distance from the cruise ships, industry expansions imply an increasing privatization of public waterways. Hosting ever-bigger cruise ships also means transforming the natural environment and reallocating local resources. Bays are dredged, local water supplies tapped and garbage unloaded. At terminals, walkways are fenced off, access roads expanded for day-tour buses and local businesses sometimes threatened with relocation. Invasive species hitchhiking on the cruise ships can alter local ecosystems.

"To allow the construction of a marine terminal in the middle of Zihuatanejo Bay means the collapse of the town," declared environmentalist Silvestre Pacheco, project director for the SOS Bahia group.

The Business of Cruising

The dynamic that boiled over in Zihuatanejo is simmering in coastal communities across Mexico, the world's numero uno cruise destination. The number of ship passengers visiting Mexican waters doubled from about 3.2 million in 2000 to 6.4 million in 2007, according to the Florida Caribbean Cruise Association (FCCA), a trade industry group. Some 22 Mexican ports now host cruise ships, and federal officials plan to make the cruise business even bigger. Sailing to Mexico on vessels departing from California and Florida ports, U.S. and Canadian nationals comprise the vast majority of cruise ship tourists. In recent years, cruise vacations have become trendy. Even readers of the liberal Nation magazine and listeners to Air America are pitched cruises hosted by their favorite corporate-bashing celebrities. In fact, in a prematurely triumphant mood, the center-left radio network plans a three nation Obama victory cruise after the U.S. presidential election in November to Belize, Mexico and Guatemala.

Earmarking tens of millions of tax dollars for infrastructure development, the Mexican government justifies its investment splurge as classic, trickle-down economics: More tourists mean more money, hence more jobs. The question is at what cost and to whose benefit?

According to Mexico's National Tourism Ministry (Sectur), income from the industry rose from $201.3 million to $487.5 million between 2000 and 2007. Using bigger numbers than Mexico's federal government, the FCCA estimated that cruise ships contributed $565 million and created 16,000 jobs in Mexico during 2006.

The cash flow from cruise ships is but a small slice of a vast international tourism industry that earned Mexico $12.9 billion last year, and employed about 2.4 million people, according to Sectur.

Two lines, Carnival Cruise Line and Royal Caribbean, are the undisputed lords of Mexican waters, according to trade industry and media reports. Although the cruise lines run out of U.S. ports and are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the foreign-flagged companies are officially based abroad and not subject to most U.S. taxes or labor laws. Indeed, many of the largely unregulated cruise industry's 150,000 workers are from developing nations. They often sleep in hot, squalid underdecks and get $10 to $20 for a 10 to 13-hour work day, according to the International Transport Workers' Federation. Tip earning domestic staff are paid about $50 a month.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: terrorism, california, mexico, washington dc, alaska, corporate accountability, john kerry, cruises, icv



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another skewed, under-researched anti-cruise article
Posted by: cruisemates on Jul 15, 2008 9:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is so predictable these days to see articles that quote the tired statistics of ICV without noting that the cases they still use as their "case studies", Carver's and Dishman's are now several years old and none have replaced them.

The fact is the cruise industry has made major strides in improving crime investigation and reporting capabilities, and if a crime that happens in or near Mexican waters is never prosecuted that is the fault of Mexico - not the cruise lines.

The cruise lines already report ALL possible crimes to the FBI for investigation. Your ICV figures are for REPORTED crimes, not for incidences that ended in even bringing charges. Those figures, after FBI investigation, are almost nil. The reason is most people, including Carver's own daughter who disappeared, do it under their own power. There is no crime involved.

You may as well be investigating the Golden Gate Bridge or Niagara Falls.

The ICV has a personal axe to grind, and too many reporters see that but don't think about looking into the organization or their claims. They're well-meaning, and understandably upset about their personal experiencs, but they are mistaken in the way they extrapolate their cases into suggesting a larger, hidden cruise ship crime problem. It just isn't there, as looking for newer cases would reveal. There are few, but when you consider some 12 million people cruise every year you are FAR safer on a cruise than on land, despite what the ICV says - especially in Mexico.

Cruising is a very successful industry that brings economic benefits to a lot of people. The Mexican Riviera stands to make billions in the future if they make cruises to Mexico more attractive. West coast cruisers don't have other places to cruise to. However, I will tell you more people on the West Coast fly to Maimi to take a Caribbean cruise than Cruise out of CAL to Western Mexico. Is that really the way you want to keep it?

Wouldn't the Mexican miitary be doing something anyway? You speak as if they have had to build up their troop numbers to handle cruise ships. I doubt it.

The best thing Mexico could do to improve safety on cruise ships - if that really is your concern, is to create a mutual agreement with US law enforcement to handle crime investigations and prosecutions for the rare crimes that happen on ships.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

more penny-wise, pound-foolish business
Posted by: athurlow on Jul 18, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Zijuatenejo's biggest asset is that it is not Ixtapa (just as Cozumel is not Cancun) - I visited "z-town" 20 years ago, and loved it's casual, sleepy village charm. Eco-tourism is booming, and many affluent tourists hunger for places that are not simply gigantic shopping malls - developers' greed will end up destroying the appeal that hold-outs lie Zijuatenejo retain. Kudos to the local activists for winning this round!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]