Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Just Where Are Those Iranian Weapons That the Bushies Say Are Flooding Iraq?

By Gareth Porter, IPS News. Posted May 23, 2008.


The military insists that Iranian arms are fueling the Iraqi insurgency, but continue to provide little evidence to back up the claim.
Advertisement

The U.S. military command in Iraq continues to talk about an alleged pipeline of Iranian weapons to Iraqi Shiites opposing the U.S. occupation, implying that they have become dependent on Iran for indirect-fire weapons and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs).

But U.S. officials have failed thus far to provide evidence that would support that claim, and a long-delayed U.S. military report on Iranian arms is unlikely to offer any data on what proportion of the weapons in the hands of Shiite fighters are from Iran and what proportion comes from purchases on the open market.

When Maj. Gen. Kevin Bergner was asked that question at a briefing May 8, he did not answer it directly. Instead Bergner reverted to a standard U.S. military line that these groups "could not do what they're doing without the support of foreign support [sic]." Then he defined "foreign support" to include training and funding as well as weapons, implicitly conceding that he did not have much of a case based on weapons alone.

Bergner's refusal to address that question reflects a fundamental problem with the U.S. claims about Iranian weapons in Iraq: if there are indeed any Iranian rockets and mortars, and RPGs in the Mahdi Army's arsenal of stand-off weapons, they represent an insignificant part of it.

Reports by the U.S. command in Iraq over the past 15 months cited only a handful of Iranian weapons out of hundreds counted in caches found in Shiite areas. Nearly 700 mortars and rockets were reported by specific caliber size, along with a handful of RPGs, in nearly two dozen caches. Of that total, only four rockets were reported as being of Iranian origin, and another 15 were listed as possibly being Iranian.

Although those reports do not represent all the Mahdi Army caches found, they provide further evidence of the relative importance of Iranian rockets, mortars and RPGs in the Mahdi Army arsenal. That is because U.S. military officials are so eager to publicise any discovery of an Iranian-made weapon system that they would exploit any opportunity available to do so.

The U.S. command has gone so far as to claim that it had found "four Iranian hand grenades" -- but they were in a cache of weapons found in an al Qaeda area.

Based on weapons caches discovered over the past 15 months, the Mahdi Army has relied overwhelmingly on four types of heavy weapons: 60mm and 120mm mortars, 107mm rocket, and 57mm anti-tank missile.

Those are essentially the same mortars and rockets that have turned up in al Qaeda and Sunni insurgent weapons caches, suggesting that both groups have obtained their heavier weapons from the international arms market. In fact, 60mm and 120mm mortars were used by Sunni guerrillas in the very early months of the war against U.S. occupation troops.

A U.S. explosives expert, Maj. Marty Weber, confirmed in April 2007 that most 107mm rockets found in Iraq were Chinese-made. He claimed that Iran had repainted Chinese 60mm and 107mm rockets them and sold them on the "open market".

However, Chinese, Yugoslav and Pakistani 107mm rockets have also been the weapon of choice of Taliban guerrillas in Afghanistan, according to U.S. military officers there.

The U.S. military has refrained from making any charges against Iran over the 107mm rockets found in Iraq, perhaps because it would support the conclusion that the Mahdi Army was buying weapons on the international market rather than obtaining them from the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps.

U.S. officials tried to capitalise on the increased mortar and rocket attacks on the Green Zone and U.S. military headquarters last year to argue that they were the result of a rising tide of Iranian supply of such stand-off weapons -- particularly 240mm rockets -- to what the U.S. command calls "special groups" of Shiite militiamen.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, iraq, warmongers, neocons, propaganda

Gareth Porter is an historian and national security policy analyst. The paperback edition of his latest book, "Perils of Dominance: Imbalance of Power and the Road to War in Vietnam", was published in 2006.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Now why would anyone ever believe what the US government says about anything
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on May 23, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
seriously!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why wouldn't we believe our military
Posted by: carbon-based on May 23, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Has Porter been hiding under a rock all this time. It is proven and actually been acknowledged right here on Alternet articles that Iran is controlling the insurgent activity. To think they are providing weapons, money for weapons and other support isn't much of a leap.

When it comes to our troops I's rather believe our military than a liberal anti writer any day! - another no brainer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Correction Posted by: carbon-based
Look Inward
Posted by: QQOblivion on May 23, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AMERICA is one of the biggest arms manufacturers in the world (including of harmful-to-civilians cluster bombs and land-mines). If the US, as it seems we might, attacks Iran using Iran's alleged "intervention" in Iraq as an excuse, then a good number of countries world-wide would have just as good an excuse to attack the US, since our own weapons and military aid are used throughout the world to exacerbate violence.
The difference between Iran and the US: Iran isn't REALLY involved in the Iraqi conflict to any significant or damaging degree. We are. It is the US, not Iran, that is preventing a peaceful resolution in Iraq. Should we bomb ourselves now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just Where Are Those Iranian Weapons...?
Posted by: Crazy H on May 23, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Silly Libruls!

Those weapons were obviously loaded onto the same trains that took Saddam's WMDs into Syria - where they hid them all in the top dresser drawer under their socks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gen. Bergner acts as Whitehouse propaganda conduit
Posted by: lessbread on May 23, 2008 2:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the last several years Gen. Kevin Bergner has acted as a conduit for Whitehouse propaganda. You can google that for yourself, but it would be nice to see an extensive expose on all of the war of terror falsehoods that Bergner has peddled for Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THEY JUST NEVER RUN OUT OF STUFF
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 23, 2008 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the difference where the weapons come from? Why was the Admin.so shocked when the Iraqis defended themslves to begin with? People defend themselves and their homes. They didn't sit back and wait to be 'liberated' from their dictator by us or anyone else. That was a crock and they knew it. Give us all credit for having some sense. It's time to declare the mission the failure that it is. Do the best we can with what's left. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]