Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Marketing Ethnic Cleansing: Israel Parties Like It's 1948 on its 60th Birthday

By Linda Mamoun, AlterNet. Posted May 8, 2008.


The frenzy around Israel Independence Day is an attempt to freeze history in 1948 when public support of Israel was unequivocal.
Advertisement

Two weeks before Israel's 60th anniversary the House and Senate voted unanimously to pass resolutions honoring "the founding of the modern State of Israel." Before the House vote, Speaker Nancy Pelosi weighed in on the deliberations saying, "I urge our colleagues to speak with one voice, and support this resolution recognizing the 60th anniversary of the state of Israel. In doing so, we not only commend Israel, we also bring luster to this House by associating ourselves with that great state of Israel." To further commemorate Israeli independence, Pelosi reserved time through the month of June for a weekly series of floor speeches.

Israel Independence Day has been celebrated within Jewish communities in the United States since Israel was founded. Traditionally the celebrations were organized by synagogues or Hebrew schools. Children would sing Ha'Tikvah, the Israeli national anthem, and read scriptures on the Promised Land. But these days the anniversaries are geared toward the broader public, making headlines in places where there are large Jewish communities, but also in areas where one would be hard-pressed to find a single person identifying as Jewish. Not only are the anniversaries endorsed by celebrities and political committees (this year's "National Committee" includes former presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, the three presidential frontrunners, and all living secretaries of state), but the organizers offer a dizzying array of festivities, requiring careful planning by those hoping to partake in all the revelry.

Israel's Independence Day falls on May 8 this year, but in the US the festivities run from early April through the beginning of June. With all the events going on around the country, have you planned how you will celebrate Israeli independence?

Mark Your Calendar

If you really had your act together, you could have booked a trip to the Holy Land with Pastor John Hagee and his Christians United For Israel (CUFI) tour. During ten days in early April, the Celebrate Jerusalem Tour featured a Night to Honor Jerusalem, a Middle East Intelligence Briefing, a luncheon at the Jerusalem Convention Center, a Jerusalem Unity Rally Walk, and a "special CUFI salute" to Israel's 60th anniversary. Best of all, you would have gotten to hear Hagee's rallying speech, in which he announced his pledge of $6 million for Israeli causes (mostly settlement-related) and declared that ''Turning part or all of Jerusalem over to the Palestinians would be tantamount to turning it over to the Taliban."

For those who don't like to travel, not to worry. You can get a taste of Israel from the comfort of your own suburb. On May 18, jaunt on over to Dunwoody, just outside of Atlanta, where you can see all the major Israeli cities with the "re-creation" of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Jaffa, the Negev, Sefat and Haifa. The Dunwoody events feature "interactive family activities, such as camel rides, rowing across the Dead Sea, and climbing Masada."

In Beachwood, Ohio, party planners are encouraging revelers to "Take in the sights and sounds of Israel without leaving home!" Among other festivities, organizers have planned a faux Israeli marketplace, where shoppers can "wander displays of one-of-a-kind jewelry, crafts and artwork; smell the flowers; pick up a unique book; and enjoy family-friendly crafts, games, songs and dances."

In April, homebodies in north Jersey could have seen West Englewood Avenue in Teaneck transformed into Jerusalem's Ben Yehuda Street, featuring "wonderful vendors, delicious food and fabulous music."

If you're not into sightseeing, don't fret. You can celebrate in more traditional ways -with parades, marching bands and fireworks. To learn about festivals near you, sign up for Facebook's "Party Like It's 1948" group, or just google "Israel@60" and the name of your town.

The Israel Hobby

There's something for everyone. (And if you missed this year's big events, it's not too early to start planning for next year.)

If you're a poetry or film buff, drop by an Israel@60 reading or film festival. If you're a bookworm, join a 60th birthday book club. If you're a cyclist, register for a 5k, 10k or 60k "Ride with Israel@60" race.

If you like to pamper yourself, try Dead Sea Spa Days. If you're an art lover, why not amble into an exhibit commemorating Israeli independence? If you're a foodie, join the Israel@60 Mission, which offers a "food and wine tour of Israel culminating in a star-studded international leadership gathering." If you prefer to cook your own Israeli delicacies, sign up for an Israel@60 pita-making or Israeli hors d'œuvre class.

Not into falafel? Other options beckon.

If you're an American Idol addict, check out the results of the Israeli Idol Competition (part of a series of anniversary events in Ann Arbor). If The Amazing Race is more your thing, see who won the 2nd Annual Amazing Israel Race (a citywide treasure hunt in NYC to commemorate Israel's 60th birthday.)

If you'd rather concentrate on learning a new language, launch a "Café Ivrit" club and commit to speaking 60 minutes of Hebrew each month to honor Israel's 60-year history. If you're a budding filmmaker, try your luck in the Israel@60 video contest. If you're a famous blogger, well, you guessed it: Blog 'til you drop on 60bloggers.com. (Or mark your personal blog with the Israel@60 icon.)


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: israel



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Marketing
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 8, 2008 4:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's nice to know that some folks--including some Jewish/Israeli groups--are trying to counteract US/AIPAC propaganda.

I've even seen a couple of things on PBS about it...in-between the schmaltzy, 10-part documentaries on aircraft carriers and the Bush Dynasty.

It's also good to see more Alternet articles on the Israeli/Palestinian thing.

» JStreet, bitchaz! Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: JStreet, bitchaz! Posted by: Prairie Waif
» The idea began... Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: The idea began... Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: The idea began... Posted by: BreeMass
» BreeMass Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: BreeMass Posted by: BreeMass
» BreeMass Posted by: Prairie Waif
Byline and tone miss the meaning of Israel's 60th Anniversary
Posted by: eschreib on May 8, 2008 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Marketing ethnic cleansing" -- what a misleading byline to the meaning of Israel's 60th birthday. I refer readers to the BBC's in depth coverage of this milestone--complete with maps, demographics and historical time lines. It creates a more accurate and nuanced picture of Israel's history and challenges. One must note that although the proportion of Palestinians living inside Israel border's in 1948 has greatly diminished, the actual numbers has increased. Some ethnic cleansing. You cannot in fairness refer to alleged ethnic cleansing of Palestinians without mentioning that Jews were ethnically cleansed from surrounding Arab states in roughly the same numbers and -- oh yes -- it occurred in the context of a war, the attempt to smother Israel before it took its first breath. Take a look at the map of the proposed partition that Palestinians walked away from in 1947 and you will see the true al-Nakba. That Israel has survived and flourished as a democracy under the rule of law for 60 years is cause for celebration -- even with the enormous challenges and unresolved issues still to be solved. The sarcastic and dismissive tone of this article will not advance the cause of justice and reconciliation one iota. It reminds me of the definition of a cynic -- a person who knows the cost of everything and the value of nothing.

» In the single word Posted by: Lloyd Drako
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
» Continued Posted by: calm
» RE: Continued Posted by: bozhidar
What part of Separation of Church & State baffles them?
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 8, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no problems with the recognition of Isreal's Independent sate status - but why are WE required to jump through Gov't hoops to make it baiscally one of Our Countries National 'holiday's'.What other country do we make such focus of our gov't policies. Should we also not celebrate the Fall of the Russian block and East Berlin.
One only need look at certain Religious Dcotrines to figure out WHY Isreal is far more imporatant -apparently - then any other country in the world- including Ours!Bush, Cheney, Mac, Hillary, Pelosi.Liebermann et al are showing their 'End of Days' Philosophy and Agenda. this is a serious national and international Threat. Bill Moyer, and Young turks.com have some disturbing Video of Hagee and who supports his Stratedgy of HOW to bring about Armegeddon. There is far more to this story and the Rev Wright controversay then is being allowed to be exposed , discussed and STOPPED!

Happy Birthday, Israel
Posted by: Brez on May 8, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since its inception, Israel has been attacked, over and over, by endless Arab factions and countries with but one aim: to drive all Jews into the sea and kill them. Israel didn't start any of the wars; Israel doesn't engage in terrorist suicide bombings. Did any of you apologists for Arab violence happen to notice who the relentless agressor here is?

Gee, maybe if the Arabs of whatever the latest terrorist war-mongering persuasions are would cease and desist, Israel would stop retaliating and expanding their buffer occupations. Ya think?

» Um, no Posted by: emmas
» OOPS!!! Posted by: emmas
» Double Oops... Posted by: newtype_alpha
» RE: Happy Birthday, Israel Posted by: threecolors
» RE: Happy Birthday, Israel Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: Happy Birthday, Israel Posted by: yellow
» RE: Happy Birthday, Israel Posted by: Prairie Waif
» Are you thinking at all?? Posted by: BreeMass
» The other 2%... Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: The other 2%... Posted by: newtype_alpha
» RE: The other 2%... Posted by: BreeMass
Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the ugly new face of Brand America.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 8, 2008 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, U.S. foreign policy is insane and based on old notions of establishing a colonial empire - following in the footsteps of the British and the French. This is the actual situation.

However, this flies in the face of traditional American notions of independence for all, as well as our own history as a colony that successfully threw of the yoke of imperial foreign rule.

Thus, it is necessary to sell this colonial strategy at home as "America, the world's greatest force for good."

This is called marketing Brand America, and it is actually a huge, semi-covert propaganda/advertising campaign that is probably the #1 public perception manipulation program in the United States and abroad.

This program is critically important - it plays a cleanup role. This is why, for example, there has been no mention of impeachment of Bush for criminal behavior in the press. It is mentioned in the lefty press now and again, but without any ongoing repeat coverage. By contrast, compare how the U.S. press had a running, non-stop discussion of Clinton's impeachment - for month after month after month.

The "alternative press" could have done this, but they did not. I personally place zero trust in any nonprofit corporate 501(c) "news outlet".

What does this have to do with Israel? Well, the U.S. alternative press tends to focus on Israel's mistreatment of the Palestinians, as well as on the relationship between Israel and the Nazi Holocaust (which is used to justify all of Israel's crimes, by the way).

What the 501(c) nonprofits like Democracy Now tend to ignore is Israel's nuclear weapons program and the real role that Israel plays for Britain and the U.S.: a colonial outpost and a nuclear military base in the world's most oil-rich region. This is actually the same role that the Saudi Royals play as well- although here the support is less public. Yes, the Saudis are going nuclear, as are the Egyptians - more topics untouched by the liberal lefty press, whose vision is indeed strangely restricted. . .

In fact, our relationship with the Saudis is even more important than our relationship with the Israelis - and Egypt comes in third, I believe. Real democracy in any of those three regions would result in the ouster of U.S. friendly governments, so democracy in all three countries must be vigorously suppressed.

That is another topic that the leftly liberal press shies away from - the fact that a central goal of U.S. foreign policy is to prevent any democratic reforms in our Foreign Colonies.

Thus, our best friends in the region are some of the most undemocratic and repressive regimes on the planet - regimes that regularly oppress their civilian populations using rape, torture and illegal imprisonment (at least, illegal under the U.S. Constitution).

How does that fit in to the packaging and selling of Brand America at home and abroad? Not very well, does it?

But, I hear them say, "American can be such a force for good in the world." (Amy Goodman quote) - yes, that is how the message is packaged and sold, is it not?

The myth is the thing
Posted by: zeofredo on May 8, 2008 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My observation here-- and it's hardly original-- is that Israelis (much like hardcore Americans) live more in a bubble of idealism rather than reality. Even though this might be obvious to critics, the surprise is that this sentimental experience of statehood has survived well into post-modern times and is directly expressed through the actions of top officials. Despite our high tech trappings, a considerable portion of citizens identify with heroic sagas more than practical issues of geopolitics.

In addition, it would never occur to righteous Zionists that they provide a precedent for contemporary theocracies... primarily, the Wahhabist Saudi Muslim brotherhoods that are really behind all the upset in the Middle East (read Robert Baer: 'Sleeping with the Devil'). The Saudis make it impossible for the West to tolerate Islamic republics, but nevertheless, the state of Israel-- thriving despite its precarious position-- is a veritable whirlpool of hypocrisy and a dangerous concept to continue promoting. It practically fans the flames of dissent every day with every move it makes.

After generations of being completely ignored by the West,the Muslim world has responded by summoning their darkest most divisive instincts and insisting on legitimacy. Unfortunately, it can only result in more displacement and unrest for all involved.

» RE: The myth is the thing Posted by: BreeMass
bozhidar bob balkas
Posted by: bozhidar on May 8, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i'v sent two comments just minutes ago and neither appeared. what's going on?

bozhidar bob balkas
Posted by: bozhidar on May 8, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
correction by bozhidar, only one of my two comments are missing.
i found what hap'd. it is hidden; being a reply to eschreib's comment. thanx

bozhidar bob balkas
Posted by: bozhidar on May 8, 2008 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
following facts debunk zionist 'facts':
1.fascist, communist, christian lands carve palestine and allow ashkenazim to illegally and amorally settle in a tiny, impoverished land
2.expulsion of pals was swift and at the point of tanks, aircraft, artillery; facing three terrorist org's: irgun, stern, and haganah.
3.if mizrahim had been expelled,they were expelled long after zionist crimes.
4.arab rulers would have been stupid to expel own citizens and provide ashkenazim with cannon fodder for a jewish state
5.we remember ashkenazi cry, Let my people go, i.,e., demanding all jews be allowed to leave.
6. zionists were never for a two-state sol'n; they are not for a two-state solution now; in add'n, there's no longer a second state in expalestine. thanx

Jewish terrorists and their shameful 2006 anniversary
Posted by: HughScott on May 8, 2008 8:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1968, after visiting the Ann Frank house in Amsterdam and Dachau near Munich, I became an ardent supporter of Israel.

That changed two years ago when the IDF dropped U.S.-supplied cluster bombs and 2,000-pound bunker-busters containing depleted uranium on Lebanon, killing and maiming hundreds of innocent civilians -- all because Hezbollah allegedly kidnapped two IDF soldiers.

I realized then that Israel's ruling Likud Party was a clone of Bush 43's rightwing GOP -- a gang of bloodthirsty fascists.

Because of my new enlightenment, which sprang studying the Republican neoconservative extremist organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), I began researching the history of Israel.

Once more I was dismayed by the neocon-controlled Jewish state.

To my disgust, I learned that on July 22, 1946, so-called Jewish "freedom" fighters committed the first act of organized Middle East terrorism when they blew up Jerusalem's King David Hotel, headquarters of British rule, killing 92 people including many Arabs.

Two years ago, Likud Party officials erected a plaque outside the restored hotel and held a two-day seminar with speeches and a tour of the building by one of the Jewish "resistance fighters" involved in the attack.

Complained Simon McDonald, the British Ambassador in Tel Aviv, and John Jenkins, the Consul-General in Jerusalem, “We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated.”

In particular, McDonald and Jenkins demanded the removal of the plaque that paid tribute to Irgun, the Jewish "resistance" group headed by Menachem Begin, which carried out the deadly bombing.

The maltreatment of Arabs continues, with Israel holding thousands of innocent Palestinian men, women and children in squalid detention camps. That tells me Likud Party members learned the wrong lessons from WWII's Holocaust.

See Reuters:
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 8, 2008 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Blue-on-white Star of David flags fluttered from cars, rooftops and balconies, fighter planes traced "60" in smoke trails across the sky, paratroopers dropped into the sea and a televised youth Bible quiz highlighted the place Jewish faith holds in a state mainly founded by secular Zionists."

"War or the threat of it has clouded every day for Israelis since David Ben-Gurion declared their state in 1948 that was destined to be a haven for survivors of the Nazi Holocaust."


Israel marks 60 years as political clouds gather
Thu May 8, 2008

The real story is far more complex, and to understand it one must also know a little about the region's history in the early 20th century (try watching Lawrence of Arabia for starters, then Rob Newman's History of Oil - on google video).

One must also understand that the Zionist or "Jewish nationalist" movement has much in common with two other similar but radically different groups - the "Back to Africa" movement of Marcus Garvey, which led to the Rastafarians, and the wildy different Aryan race-nationalism of poverty-stricken Germany in the 1920s and 30s, which grew into the National Socialist State, which was the product of an alliance between the Aryan nationalists and the huge German industrial combines of I.G. Farben and United Steel Works - and those combines had a great many business relationships with the United States.

I recall talking to some college students a while ago - Jewish members of one of the campus pro-Israel clubs - and they knew all about Auschwitz, but had never heard of I.G. Farben.

The secular Zionists have their own state combines... they don't like to talk about I.G. Farben and United Steel. They also don't like to talk about the Hungarian and Russian Jews, or the Ethiopian Jews... because the dirty little secret of the secular Zionists is that they are all infected with virulent racism, more or less, much as the Nazi Aryans were. Furthermore, the people who actually run Israel are the owners of the major corporate interests that invest in Israel - everyone from Warren Buffet's investment in Iscar (machine tools, read high-tech manufacture, and this is Israel, and yes, that is weapons manufacture - Iscar was founded as a response to French weapons embargoes in 1967) to the Israel Gold Coast, home of a good chunk of Yeltsin's old Russian comrades who also "invested" their IMF loan money in Israel.

The orthodox Jewish groups are actually opposed to the Zionist program - not that they get much airtime in the U.S. corporate press.

"Announcement by the Rabbinical Congress of Upstate New York, February 7, 2002 -

According to the Torah, the Jews are forbidden to have a State, even a religious State.

Therefore, all Rabbis and God-fearing Jews, since its inception have opposed Zionism in any form and all of its ensuing actions. "With pain and sorrow we will gather to protest against the Torah defying 'State of Israel,' specifically against their Leader the bloodthirsty, Sharon! Who is presently visiting President Bush. It is he who in defiance of the Torah desecrated the name of the Almighty by going on the holy mount proclaiming war against the Palestinian people. He thereby instigated and exploded an endless chain of murder and bloodshed of all people in the Holy Land. He is constantly fueling this war together with his atheist colleagues in the government of Israel.


Yes - that is the honest religious perspective, which gets zero airtime in the American press.

subject
Posted by: tre on May 8, 2008 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's amazing is how totally inane the celebrations are --but so poisonous at the same time.

This govt's policy isn't going to change. No matter who gets elected.

Correction...
Posted by: BreeMass on May 8, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to an earlier statement. The American Jews who have immigrated to Palestine only come in at a close second as the scariest people in Israel and Occupied PAlestine. The American Christian followers of Hagee and the like are the scariest and, as a Jew, Christian Zionism gives me the creeps. Why would I want the support of a bunch of Jesus-crazed wackos who are only going to support me until the Temple is rebuilt and then force me to convert or go to hell (provided any of the prophetic nonsense comes true in the first place, which I doubt)?? Why Jews see this as positive support is beyond me. You'd thank after a millenia of oppression, we'd be a bit more far-sighted...

» Christian Zionism Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Correction... Posted by: Prairie Waif
Statehood and Expulsion in 1948
Posted by: fanny666 on May 8, 2008 10:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From Jews For Justice: what happened in 1948.

» Some more links Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Some more links Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: Some more links Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: Some more links Posted by: Prairie Waif
» RE: Some more links Posted by: BreeMass
listreen
Posted by: lincolntalbot on May 8, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i'm glad to see that this discussion hasn't gotten completely out of control. which sometimes happens when topics like this are debated.

» It's funny... Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: I feel your pain Posted by: Crazy H
» Exactly! Posted by: BreeMass
bozhidar bob balkas
Posted by: bozhidar on May 8, 2008 2:56 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ashkenazim are in deep denial ab. antisemitism.
there isn't any. what people with modicum of sanity reject is torah/judaistic numerous misteachings:
u shall not serve others but will have servants.
u shall/must be lenders but not borrowers
u shall be light onto the world
u are chosen.
does this need elaboration/elucidation? no, of course, not. stop being separatist/rejectionist and we will not reject u.
u have rejected us long before we rejected u/ur teaching. we've had enough of ur shit.

» RE: bozhidar bob balkas Posted by: BreeMass
» RE: bozhidar bob balkas Posted by: yellow
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
one more thing
Posted by: tre on May 8, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and all the media coverage today makes that point even clearer. I wish someone at the New York Times would read this article

» RE: one more thing Posted by: tre
prof cohen
Posted by: shlomco on May 8, 2008 6:31 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I challenge any thinking reader to think of ONE other example of a country that has such a balance of successes against such objective difficulties as Israel does. Therefore I think there is wonderful reason to celebrate Israel's 60th anniversary. Think of any other country on Earth that has been treated with such hysterical destructive frenzy from day one of its existence (and in fact well before that) by ALL of its neighbors. And yet that managed to distinguish itself from all its neighbors by being the only liberal democracy between the Atlantic shores of N. Africa and India: the only democracy across this enormous swath of earth! (I have met left wing radicals who deny that Israel is a democracy at all. But all conversations I had with those people left me bewildered as to how people can argue so vociferously about something they proved to be so profoundly ignorant about. Without exception.) Israel did not only prevail politically, but also economically. I challenge anyone to think of another example of a country that has no natural resources and that from day one was boycotted by ALL its neighbors, who boycotted every company who did business with any company who did business with Israel (this was known as tertiary boycott - a term invented 'in honor' of Israel), that was forced to export to the other side of the world and still be competitive, and that nonetheless, managed to flourish economically by shere hard work, so that nowadays its economy is bigger than the combined economies of all its neighbors together. (She is 7 million strong they are more than 20 times that!) This is reason for celebration. I really could go on forever. The author speaks of Israel's ethnic cleansing and it would be in vain to entertain embarking here on a meticulous historical account that would rectify this blunder. Shame on you for hurling such propagandist accusations. I will end just by saying that the unfair author of this biased article would probably not have been able to write her essay/ transmit it to the web, etc. without technologies that were conceived and developed in Israel. So there is a reason even for her to celebrate Israel's 60th anniversary.

» RE: prof cohen Posted by: improperly_sedated
Israel Is Not A Democracy
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 8:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sixty Years of Palestinian Displacement, Occupation and Suffering
By Stephen Lendman
May 05, 2008
http://tinyurl.com/5aarh3
SNIP
Arab Israelis lost all their rights and were placed under military rule. In addition, discriminatory laws were passed, like the Law of the Land of Israel. It stipulated that the Jewish National Fund (JNF - the Jewish State landowner) was forbidden to sell or lease land to non-Jews.
From inception, Israel has had no formal constitution. It's governed instead by its Basic Law. Nine laws were passed between 1958 and 1988, all of which pertained to the institutions of state. No basic rights were enacted until 1992. That year, the Basic Law: Human Dignity and Freedom was passed authorizing the Knesset to overturn laws contrary to the right to dignity, life, freedom, privacy, property and to leave and enter the country. The law states: "There shall be no violation of the life, body or dignity of any person. All persons are entitled to protection" of these rights, and "There shall be no deprivation or restriction of the liberty of a person by imprisonment, arrest, extradition or otherwise."
Israeli Basic Laws are for Jews only. Arab Israelis have no rights under them with one exception - the right to run for public office in the Knesset, become a nominal legislative member, but have no power beyond a public stage for their views to be shouted down and ignored.

Israel Has No Right To Exist
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Existing Question
By Remi Kanazi
May 22, 2006
http://www.worldpress.org/2357.cfm
SNIP
United Nations (UN) Resolution 194 states:

“The refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbors should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return.”

Israel’s admittance into the UN was conditional: it must recognize UN Resolution 194. Nevertheless, since the passing of UN Resolution 273—which admitted Israel into the UN on May 11, 1949— Israel has openly rejected this requirement. Commenting on Israel’s dismissal of the resolution, Professor of Law Francis A. Boyle wrote in his book "Palestine, Palestinians and International Law"

“Insofar as Israel has violated its conditions for admission to UN membership, it must accordingly be suspended on a de facto basis from any participation throughout the entire United Nations system.”

Yet, the world hasn’t seen one UN resolution concerning Israel enforced by the UN or the international community. America specifically refers to “countless” UN resolutions Iraq refused to comply with as a major reason to invade in 2003. If America were to invade Iraq on this reasoning, one would think they would at least attempt to enforce the UN resolutions pertaining to Israel.

The implementing of UN Resolution 194 was the condition for Israel’s “right to exist.” Today we see many more factors that should make one contemplate this right. Israel illegally occupies East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Post-disengagement, Israel continues to occupy Gaza through control of borders, air, water, and resources. According to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, since March 31 of this year, Israel has fired more than 5100 artillery shells at Gaza.

The occupation is illegal under international law and UN resolution 242 (reaffirmed by resolution 338). UN resolution 242 explicitly states that Israel must “withdraw from territories occupied.” On this basis, before going into the brutality of the occupation, one cannot expect the Palestinian Authority to recognize Israel’s “right to exist.”

Ethnic Cleansing
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 8:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Israel will create in the course of the next 10 or 20 years conditions which would attract natural and voluntary migration of the refugees from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank to Jordan."
--Yitzak Rabin, former Labor Party Prime Minister--

"It is the duty of Israeli leaders to explain to public opinion, clearly and courageously, a certain number of facts that are forgotten with time. The first of these is that there is no Zionism, colonization or Jewish state without the eviction of the Arabs and the expropriation of their lands."
--Ariel Sharon, former Likud Party Prime Minister, Agence France Press, November 15, 1998--

"You don’t simply bundle people onto trucks and drive them away. I prefer to advocate a positive policy, to create, in effect, a condition that in a positive way will induce people to leave."
--Ariel Sharon, August 24, 1988--

Olmert, Sharon's heir, has also recently avowed his commitment to the ideal of 'Eretz Israel':
"Only a person in whose soul Eretz Yisrael burns knows the pain of letting go of our ancestral heritage"
--Ehud Olmert, May 4th 2006, speech to the Knesset whilst presenting the Unilateral Disengagement Plan--

"I believed, and to this day still believe, in our people’s eternal and historic right to this entire land."
--Ehud Olmert, Israeli Prime Minister, to the US House of Representatives, June 2006--

Jews Are Not A Race - Just A Religion
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 8:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There was no such thing as "Jewish" until God spoke to Abraham.

Abraham was 90 years old and was married to his own sister named Sarah, when God visited him. Genesis 20:12

After God's visit, .... Abraham is the first Hebrew or the first person to begin chanting a new religion (The belief in one God) and that is how the word "Jewish" found it's way into our history.

Abraham was not born a Jew, he only converted from idolatry and idol worship, which was being practiced in the area, .... and to a new religion .... the belief in One God.

So, Jews are not a race or a People.

Calm

» Hi! BreMass Posted by: calm
» RE: Hi! BreMass Posted by: BreeMass
» Abraham was not a Jew, Posted by: Lloyd Drako
Israel Claims That Terrorism Is Okay
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 8:32 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A former Prime Minister of Israel said it was Okay to commit terrorist acts.

“Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war... We are very far from any moral hesitations when concerned with the national struggle. First and foremost, terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today...”
--Yitzhak shamir--

Israel's Long-Term Ethnic Cleansing and Institutionalized Racism
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 8:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1800: 2.5% Jews, 89% Arabs
1890: 8% Jews, 81% Arabs
1914: 14% Jews, 76% Arabs
1922: 11% Jews, 78% Arabs
1931: 17% Jews, 74% Arabs
1945: 31% Jews, 60% Arabs
2006: 76% Jews, 20% Arabs

http://tinyurl.com/6q4zg2

CALM
Posted by: BreeMass on May 8, 2008 9:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is your point?

» RE: CALM Posted by: yellow
polite conversation
Posted by: tre on May 8, 2008 9:26 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see that it was a bit premature for me to commend the participants of this message board on staying within the realm of civility.

» RE: polite conversation Posted by: BreeMass
nice
Posted by: engbiao on May 8, 2008 10:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is excellent. i've read it like 20 times now. it made me laugh. did you people check out some of these events? wack!!

i still don't really get the title. the article was so cerebral and clever but the title made it seem like it was going to be a screed.

keep up the good work.

What is the Meaning of the "Jewish State?"
Posted by: calm on May 8, 2008 10:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Not Just The Palestinians Who Won't Recognize A "Jewish State"
May 14, 1948. The context is that the Zionist government has proclaimed a "Jewish state" in Palestine, and is seeking U.S. recognition of that state. The document is President Harry S. Truman's response to that request.
The interesting thing is that the original text of the document is edited with hand-written corrections, to produce the wording finally approved by Truman. And the purpose of the editing is specifically to remove the suggestion that the U.S. recognizes a "Jewish state", and to clarify that it recognizes instead the "state of Israel".
How about that: the United States was asked in 1948 to recognize the "Jewish state", but offered recognition instead to the "state of Israel". Just as the PLO does today.
So why exactly is it uncontroversial when we do it, but an obstacle to peace when they do it?

Here is a picture of the document
http://tinyurl.com/5chgac

What is the Meaning of the "Jewish State?"
By Israel Shahak
American Report
October 1973
http://tinyurl.com/2a6x2a
SNIP
The real situation in Isreal is really very simple: Israel is not an "Israeli" state, or a state of its citizens but it is a "Jewish state."

In practical terms what it means for those of its unfortunate inhabitants officially described as "non-Jews?" What it means to be a non-Jew in Jerusalem for example? Again the answer is quite simple. The state of Israel builds huge building projects in Jerusalem. But for whom? Not just for "Israeli citizens;" only for Jews. An inhabitant of Jerusalem can never be eligible for a flat in those building projects if he for example happens believe in Jesus Christ or in the Prophet Mohammad and acts on this belief, i.e. is a member of any Christian or Muslim religion. If he is an atheist, his right for obtaining a flat in most of the newly built housing projects in Jerusalem belonging to the State of Israel, depends strictly on his race. If he can bring proof that his mother, grandmother, great grandmother and the grandmother of the grandmother were all Jewesses, he is regarded as a Jew and can obtain a place to live in. If one of the links is weak he can not.

This situation is the same in most areas of Israel. More than 90% of the inhabited areas of the State of Israel are under the rule of the Jewish National Fund regulations, under which non-Jews cannot rent or buy a house or flat, open a business, in short cannot live. This land is called in Hebrew "the saved" land. The land which belongs to non-Jews is called unsaved not national (the term "national" in Israel does not mean "Israeli" but "Jewish") and by buying or confiscating it from a non-Jew by a Jew, the land is supposed to be "saved."

This is of course only the beginning. A Jew by the mere fact that he is a Jew, will obtain a host of other privileges, over the non-Jew, some of them worth a lot of money, some honorary. A Jew obtains not only the right to live on most of Israeli land, he also obtains a loan and a mortgage to help him. When a new Jewish settlement is being established (on the land was "saved"—confiscated from non-Jews and made Jewish) all the Jewish inhabitants enter into prepared houses, with water and electricity. Many of the old non-Jewish villages have still no water or electricity now and are some cases in which the electricity line newly built to serve the new Jewish settlement passes the old Arab (in official parlance non-Jewish) village which is still forbidden to use it and sits in the evening in darkness watching the shining Jewish settlement. A building project for the newly-married applies only for the Jewish newly-married and so on. To be a Jew in a Jewish state is to be both a privileged being, and to be able to receive a lot of "easy" money a non-Jew can not ever get.

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
no Jewish consensus in 1948 or today...
Posted by: NWS on May 9, 2008 12:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow. Please excuse me if I repeat anything, I couldn't quite bring myself to wade through this entire hot mess of commentary...

Just wanted to thank you for posting this article and mentioning No Time To Celebrate:Jews Remember the Nakba. There's some footage of the Radio City demo here and much more to come.

Calm - we get it
Posted by: BreeMass on May 9, 2008 1:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Israel sucks, Jews are illegitimate as a religion and a nation, Israel has spies everywhere and Jews are working tirelessly to bring about the end of the world.

now can you stop monopolizing the board please?

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Guess Not
Posted by: BreeMass on May 9, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suppose an empty board where nobody will bother responding is just to good to pass up...

a little too much irony
Posted by: tre on May 9, 2008 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love your comments, Bree, but I'm just worried that some may not recognize the irony of your words. It might be better not to even say those things on this message board. I personally would rather not see things like that at all. The Jewish religion is just as beautiful as any other religion. What I have a problem with is how Israel was established (and how it relates to its neighbors). I have no problem with Jewish people themselves, which is good considering that I'm from a Jewish background!

» RE: a little too much irony Posted by: BreeMass
Sucking up
Posted by: carbon-based on May 11, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Amazing how Pelosi and co know where the money comes from. How about just congratulating Israel and remain in touch with whats best for America. Neither republicans or democrats seem to get that.