Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Brokaw's Blind Spot on Vietnam

By Fred Branfman, Truthdig. Posted April 16, 2008.


How is it possible to write a book about the '60s without an in-depth discussion of the Vietnam War?
Advertisement

"I committed the same kinds of atrocities as thousands of others in that I shot in free-fire zones, fired .50-caliber machine bullets, used harass-and-interdiction fire, joined in search-and-destroy missions, and burned villages. All of these acts are contrary to the laws of the Geneva Convention, and all were ordered as written, established policies from the top down, and the men who ordered this are war criminals." -- John Kerry, on "Meet the Press," April 1971.

Tom Brokaw's best-selling book, Boom! Voices of the Sixties -- Personal Reflections on the '60s and Today, bills itself as "a virtual reunion of a cross section of the Sixties crowd, in an effort to discover what we might learn from each other, forty years later." Its 688 pages consist mainly of interviews with more than 80, mostly successful, veterans of the '60s, dealing with Vietnam, the civil rights and women's movements, and electoral politics. Other than Vietnam, his material is relatively unobjectionable, since America has made some progress -- though not as much as he suggests -- in the domestic arena. The personal stories of women leaders and courageous African-Americans, who rose to prominence from the trenches of the burgeoning women's movement and from the barricades of the civil rights movement, are inspiring.

But one reads the Vietnam War sections of Brokaw's book with a growing sense of amazement, disbelief and, ultimately, profound sadness. For Brokaw has, incredibly, managed to compile a lengthy book about the 1960s that barely mentions the central event which created and shaped it. A reader of Boom! would have no idea that U.S. leaders pursued a war that killed enormous numbers of Indochinese civilians and that this mass murder was the single most important factor prompting the various domestic convulsions we now call "The '60s."

Given Brokaw's many years as one of network television's main news anchors, and that his views so often reflect conventional wisdom, this omission raises troubling questions: is it really possible for America to have killed hundreds of thousands of Indochinese peasants and still, 30 years later, act as if it never happened? Has Brokaw really so sabotaged his own heartfelt call to unite America by ignoring what we learned from South Africa: that true national reconciliation can occur only if hard truths are acknowledged, responsibility taken and amends made?

Is our Indochina history really to remain a nightmare from which we will never awaken?

Partly as a result of America's continuing refusal to fully confront the history and legacy of its involvement in Indochina, U.S. leaders have been permitted to commit many of the same mistakes and war crimes in Iraq as they did in Vietnam. Historical analogy is, of course, debatable. But such parallels as the media buying George W. Bush's lies about weapons of mass destruction just as it did Lyndon B. Johnson's deceptions about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, and the ways in which the U.S. has been weakened in Iraq just as it was in Indochina, are too important to be ignored.

Brokaw's book provides a mirror reflecting the many ways America continues to live in a web of denial and deception. The key event of the 1960s was not "the Vietnam war" as Brokaw describes it -- a conventional war between opposing armies -- but U.S. leaders' approval of policies that led to the mass murder of civilians. Such "collateral damage" was inherent in fighting against a native population sheltering a guerrilla force seeking to expel a foreign invader. It is a fact that Washington -- whatever its declared intent or rhetorical conceits -- pursued a strategy and tactics that led to the killing of tremendous numbers of Indochinese civilians, and wounded and made homeless more than 10 million people, by dropping 6.7 million tons of bombs (and firing as much ground ordnance from Army bases and giant Navy ships) on tiny Indochina, more than triple the World War II bombing of all Europe and the Pacific theater. Former U.S. Defense Secretary Robert S. McNamara, a principal architect of the Vietnam War, has estimated that 3.4 million Vietnamese died in the war. A sizable number of these were civilians, as were a very large number of Laotian and Cambodian peasants who died from years of U.S. bombing of their towns and villages.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: vietnam war, veterans, tom brokaw, 1960s, anti-war, left, silent majority, kerry



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Brokaw, after years spent distorting the news, is now rewriting history.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 16, 2008 2:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tom Brokaw, lifetime achievement award winner in the Ministry of Truth, is just continuing to do what he has always done.

Have you ever noticed the remarkable similarity between the smirk of Tom Brokaw, trusted and charismatic news anchor, and the smirk of George W. Bush? When they smirk, I'm guessing they're thinking "You people are so stupid that you'll believe whatever I say!" Just compare these beauties - who is less genuine?

George W. Bush's smirk and Tom Brokaw's smirk

For more on the psychology of Bush-Brokaw smirkiness, visit http://www.slate.com/id/1004144/

Brokaw is the epitome of the stuffed shirt - talking head phenomenon in nightly newscasting. And now he's writing revisionist history? Well... that's the story of his life. Spin the news, spin the history, all with a pleasant smirk.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you for this great review.
Posted by: Lauren on Apr 16, 2008 3:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found his treatment of the drug war, another big culture war issue, just as twisted towards the corporate slant (old white man viewpoint). It really infuriated me to watch his smirking mug on TV interviews when his book came out. It is discouraging too. Lots of people swallow his version whole. He completely misrepresented my people.

I realized his irresponsible presentation of this twisted version of events goes way back in a negative way into my life.

He is a nasty, lying, drug war front warrior to be sure. Sack him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brokaw as Historian?
Posted by: iconoblaster on Apr 16, 2008 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you take your history from someone who made a career out of reading the evening news to you -
then you deserve what you get.
Brokaw has never been anything more than a corporate shill just like the large majority of his peers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brokaw as Historian? Posted by: willymack
Broke-Jaw TALKING Head!
Posted by: williameon on Apr 16, 2008 4:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Broke-Jaw gets another payoff
From The Puppet Bass-Turds.
For Spewing
Another pile of
Corpirate
BU__! SH__!

The Sheeple
are given
Dumb A-S Awards
For turning on
Their
Indoctrination Sets.

Pile the children's
bodies high,
High as the Sky.

Dancing with the Shills.
Next American Martha.
Survival U.S.A.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

These guys are criminals
Posted by: cjsm on Apr 16, 2008 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing is Brokaw and his kind, Jennings, Gibson, Rather, Couric, Williams, etc. are not ignorant like the yahoos that vote for Bush. They know damn well the numerous monstrous crimes the U.S. government has committed in foreign countries. They're probably, or should be, better informed then many of us, since tracking the news is their full time job.

Yet they put on a smiling face and push the propaganda about what a righteous country the United States is, and how righteous and what heroes the President and military and CIA are. They are criminals and murders just as Bush, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, and all the Presidents are.

My dream is someday all theses criminals will be put on trial for war crimes. And people like Brokaw will be included as accomplices, much like the propagandists for the 3rd Reich are guilty of murder themselves, even if they never pulled the trigger.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Feel Good" History
Posted by: taxidriver on Apr 16, 2008 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brokaw wants to sell books. Remember, he wrote "The Greatest Generation" about WWII. He doesn't want "to turn people off" by writing about American atrocities and the brutally violent nature of the Vietnam Conflict. Yes, he deserves to be criticized for this. But he knows his audience. Just as he tapped into the WWII generation and its nostalgia, so now is he tapping the nostalgia of aging Baby Boomers, many of whom would rather forget the "excesses" of Vietnam. So here's some advice: Don't buy his book!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Brokaw grew up in South Dakota where Native American history is OFF in schools.
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 16, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He acknowledged it once on television that in most schools in South Dakota, Native American history is zilch. You gotta wonder why racism against the natives is so high in that state. And believe me, my uncle who lives there sees it every day inevitably.

So of course Tom Brokaw grew up with the skills of writing off history. Then again, any media hack would do it because it's already known that the media cheered the war in Vietnam just like they're cheering the war-turned-occupation in Iraq. Go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Brokaw -- card-carrying member of the Power Elite
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 16, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the things that has divided our nation into a Have and Have-Not society is the
"Renaissance Weekend" (RW).

RW's are private, invitation-only retreats for leaders in business and finance, government, the media, religion, medicine, science, technology and the arts. Conversations are strictly off the record and subject matter ranges widely, tending to focus heavily on policy and business issues.

David Keene, a Republican member of the RW Advisory Board involved in the American Conservative Union, described Renaissance Weekends this way: "So many people are busy networking for their own advantage that it's something of a pain. Initially, I think (RW) envisioned something that was sort of a fun, but also intellectually and personally stimulating, weekend. But it became very quickly a sort of way that these people could help each other rise to power."

Bill and Hillary Clinton have attended 10 RW retreats which may explain how they "earned" $109 million since 2000.

Another RW attendee was Tom Brokaw. So much for objective main street reporting.

The past and present RW advisory board of both Democrats and Republicans includes the following elitist power brokers, corporate heads, educators and media personalities:

Bill Clinton
Gerald Ford
Rita Braver (TV News Correspondent)
Louis Cabot (Former Chm., Cabot Corp. & Brookings Institution)
Steve Case (Former Chm., AOL Time Warner)
Wesley Clark (Former Supreme Allied Commander, NATO)
Gordon Conway (President, Rockefeller Foundation)
Craig Fields (Former Chm., Defense Science Board & Director, D.A.R.P.A)
Howard Fineman (Chief Political Correspondent, Newsweek/TV Commentator)
Millard Fuller (Founder, Habitat for Humanity)
Gordon Gee (President, Vanderbilt University)
David Gergen (Former Presidential Advisor/Editor-at-large, U.S. News & World Report)
Bob Graham (U.S. Senator & Florida Governor)
Sir Jeremy Greenstock (Former British Ambassador to the United Nations)
Amy Gutmann (President, University of Pennsylvania)
Arianna Huffington (Political Commentator)
Myron Kandel (Former Financial Editor, CNN)
Rosabeth Moss Kanter (Professor, Harvard Business School/Author, World Class)
Rich Karlgaard (Publisher, Forbes)
William Kennard (Partner, Carlyle Group/Former Chm., Federal Communications Commission)
Frank Luntz (Political Consultant)
Fred Malek (Chm., Thayer Capital)
Sir Deryck Maughan (Chm., Citigroup International)
Newton Minow (Former Chm., F.C.C. & RAND Corp.)
Leslie Moonves (Chm., CBS)
Jay Nordlinger (Managing Editor, National Review)
Peter Norton (Creator, Norton Utilities)
Norman Ornstein (Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute)
Deval Patrick (Frmr. U.S. Asst. Atty.-General, & Gen. Counsel, Texaco and Coca-Cola Companies)
William Perry (Former U.S. Secretary of Defense)
David Pottruck (Former Chief Executive Officer, Charles Schwab Corp./Co-Author, Clicks & Mortar)
Diane Sawyer (TV News Host)
Robert Schuller II (Minister)
Christopher Shays (U.S. Congressman)
John Templeton, Jr. (President, Templeton Foundation)
Richard Thornburgh (GOP/PNAC signatory, Former U.S. Attorney-General & Pennsylvania Governor)
Richard Viguerie (GOP/Rightwing extremist, former Publisher, Conservative Digest)

---------------------

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, lifelong registered Republican, Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a shame
Posted by: WhatNow? on Apr 16, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to think there are people who will buy brokaw's piece of dung book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Gulf of Tonkin "incident" was fabricated to get U.S. into war,
Posted by: LeftWright on Apr 16, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
just as 9/11 was fabricated to launch the "war on terror" folks.

Come on, AlterNet, that's where the real story is here.

Or, are you sneaking up on the truth?

We can handle it, can you?

The truth shall set us free. Love is only way forward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brokaw's Bullshit that's why..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Apr 16, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His whole deal with the 60's was pure bullshit nothing but magnifying any negatives like a good little fascist ass-kisser..!

Simple as that..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any history of the sixties
Posted by: willymack on Apr 16, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MUST include the Vietnam war. That war DEFINED that time period in my opinion. I found myself in San Francisco during that conflict, and out of curiosity went to the Haight-Ashbury district a few times. I found the people there to be gentle and kind as well as educated and great conversationists. I'm not going to say that I threw away my uniform, went AWOL, and bought a bong, because I did none of those. After all, as a military man, I was aware of my oath to my country, and possessed of the belief (as I still am) that a man's word is his bond. Then, I went to Vietnam, where I quickly discovered that the Hippies in San Fran were RIGHT about the immorality of the military incursion there, and the insanity of any society permitting such an atrocity to take place. Remind you of something?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

willymack
Posted by: cacky on Apr 16, 2008 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was a tiny child in the sxities, so my question is - how does today's war climate compare? Is today's passivity worse? Doesn't even our dividedness seem spectator-like?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: willymack Posted by: badkitty
» RE: willymack Posted by: willymack
"greatest generation" now the '60's... hoo boy
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 16, 2008 1:49 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure glad the same butthole who inked GG is now waxing on about the Sixties...

As my late grandfather said in response to Generation:

"Is this Brokaw guy that fella on TV who talks like he's had a couple 5ths of whiskey?"

One round of that moron's "writing" was enough. We surely don't need another.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Doves vs. Hawks
Posted by: bessie on Apr 16, 2008 4:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The divisions between the Doves vs. the Hawks during the 60s were fairly clear cut. Getting arrested for 'long hair' wasn't that unusual. I noticed an old film clip of Mr. Brokaw during the 60s and he looked like a NARC. So you might make the assumption that he wasn't a dove. Reminds me of a recent trip to the Vietnam Wall where there is no mention of the history of Vietnam or the protests but for a few "Hanoi Jane" signs hanging from some vendor carts. Rewriting or ignoring history serves a purpose - it enables whole generations to move along and commit the same mistakes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The hippies were right"
Posted by: calibrit on Apr 17, 2008 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this is the key fact - not assertion, fact - that gets ignored about the Vietnam War.

Most people weren't hippies, and most people weren't keen on a lot of what the hippies did. However, when it came to what the hippies said about the war and about their own government, they were bang on the money and were entirely vindicated by the Pentagon Papers and the withdrawal from Vietnam. Millions were killed in the name of the "domino theory", for no purpose whatsoever.

The entire discussion about Vietnam, such as it is, in the media seems designed to ignore this very simple truth. We were wrong. Wrong to manufacture the war, wrong to prosecute it, wrong to commit war crimes, millions died as a result, and the only people who realized how to make it better and avoid the loss of millions of Indochinese and tens of thousands of American lives, were precisely those dirty f***ing hippies.

Ooh, it makes me mad. And I wasn't even born then.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

war criminals
Posted by: grmartin on Apr 21, 2008 4:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of US presidents are war criminals, including Reagan, who was voted the greatest American ever. Carter, unpopular with the public at the time, was probably the greatest president, and certainly the most decent and principled.
A sad commentary indeed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: war criminals Posted by: weatherking
Miguel
Posted by: hutch on Apr 25, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brokaw's book remains on my shelf, unread, now I understand with good reason. I had checked to see what he had written about the Clintons' drug use and found the same whitewash described in this review. Just a line or two parroting their denials. No investigation, no skepticism. I closed the book and put it on the shelf.
He was then, as he is now, an upper middle class white man supporting the establishment.

If you take away the real journalists from the phony hacks, you will be lucky to end up with Bill Moyers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]