Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Jimmy Carter: 'I'll Meet Hamas Because Someone Has to'

By Ron Bousso, Middle East Online. Posted April 14, 2008.


No peace deal can be reached without Hamas having a seat at the table.
Advertisement

Former US president Jimmy Carter on Sunday defended his plan to meet with Hamas leaders as he kicked off a trip to the Middle East, amid criticism from Washington and Israel.

Carter, who reportedly plans to meet exiled Hamas chief Khaled Meshaal in Syria, said he viewed Hamas's inclusion in peace talks as "very important" and stressed he was not traveling as an official US negotiator.

"It's very important that at least someone meet with the Hamas leaders to express their views, to ascertain what flexibility they have, to try to induce them to stop all attacks against innocent civilians in Israel and to cooperate with the Fatah as a group that unites the Palestinians," Carter told ABC news.

"There's no doubt in anyone's mind that, if Israel is ever going to find peace with justice concerning the relationship with their next-door neighbors, the Palestinians, that Hamas will have to be included in the process," he said in the interview, which was pre-recorded and aired on Sunday.

Carter arrived in Israel Sunday and held talks with President Shimon Peres in Jerusalem before meeting the parents of an Israeli soldier who was captured in June 2006 by Gaza militants and is being held by Hamas.

Israel and the Islamist Hamas movement have been holding secret, indirect negotiations to secure the release of Corporal Gilad Shalit as part of a prisoner exchange deal.

"Mr Carter promised me that he will travel to Damascus to meet Meshaal and do all he can to secure my son's release in a prisoner exchange," his father Noam Shalit said.

Carter's "study mission" that runs until April 21, will also take him to the occupied West Bank, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Jordan, his Atlanta-based Carter Center said.

Reports that Carter plans to hold talks with Meshaal in Damascus sparked a furore in the United States. Carter's office would neither confirm nor deny the reports, and the former president has remained vague about the details.

"I've not confirmed our itinerary yet for the Syrian visit, but it's likely that I will be meeting with the Hamas leaders," Carter said in the interview.

Israel urged the US ex-president not to meet Meshaal.

"Such a meeting would be all the more shameful as Jimmy Carter symbolizes peace," senior defense ministry official Amos Gilad told army radio.

He was referring to Carter's role as the architect of the 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty and his Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.

"Meeting with Hamas leaders would show support for this movement without the minimal conditions set by the international community for such a dialogue, namely a recognition of Israel's right to exist and the accords reached in the past with the Palestinians," Gilad said.

Hamas, which seized control of the Gaza Strip last June after routing Fatah forces loyal to Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, is considered a terrorist organization by the European Union and United States.

However, the 83-year-old Carter stressed in the ABC interview that he was not traveling in any official capacity.

"I'm not going as a mediator or a negotiator," he said. "I've been meeting with Hamas leaders for years."

Carter said his most recent talks came after Hamas's win in 2006 parliamentary elections. At that time, he said Hamas expressed willingness to declare a ceasefire in Gaza and the West Bank and allow Abbas to negotiate on behalf of all Palestinians.

"I intend to find out if these are their prevailing thoughts now," he said.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert appeared to shun Carter, as the two were not scheduled to meet during his four-day visit to the region.

"Carter is going to visit places we do not wish to associate ourselves with. He also never made an official request to meet Olmert," a senior official said.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: palestine, israel, olmert, hamas, carter



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
RIGHT - SOMEONE HAS TO DO IT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Apr 14, 2008 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And so it's Jimmy Carter to the rescue. He's one of a very few Americans with a thorough understanding of the very complicated Middle East. We're so lucky to have him. Condi Rice just can't get it done. She's abrasive and no one likes her. All the foreign leaders like Carter. That's a start. I wish him luck. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:RIGHT - SOMEONE HAS TO DO IT Posted by: Longdream
What price democracy?
Posted by: fhughes on Apr 15, 2008 1:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
An intersting omissiion in this article. Hamas is a democratically elected government! Today, a'democracy' is a government subservient to the US administration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hamas took illegal military control of Gaza and killed many Palestinians. Hamas is not Democratic
Posted by: yellow on Apr 15, 2008 4:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hamas abused its narrow mandate as permission to start a civil war against Fatah. They played on the understandable frustrations of the Palestinians with Fatah and the failed Oslo Peace Process. What is little understood is that Hamas, even as they are portrayed in Jonathan Cook's book, was a 1987 offshoot of attempts by the Israeli occupation to re-introduce the Muslim Brotherhood into the occupied territories as an alternative to the secular nationalist PLO. Islamic organizations were thought to be less of a threat to Israeli domination because of their paternalistic style of rule and lack of nationalist/developmentalist drive to control local resources and to create a middle class whose aspirations would politically impinge on transnational corporate profits through taxation, exchange controls and other means.

Israel's drive to control the region and de-nationalize middle eastern politics through balkanization is perfectly in line with US regional ambitions. It is based less on specifically Israeli hegemony than on the use of Israeli military pressure to create political conditions for globalizing the economies of the region for US corporations. The Iraqi case wsa the beginning. The 100 Bremer Orders, which open up the Iraqi economy as a WTO showcase, is a case in point. Foreign contractors now exceed soldiers and they run the Iraqi economy to the exclusion of most Iraqis. The control of China's oil and the preservation of US global hegemony are other motives. And, of course, US/UK oil profits have been in the stratosphere since 2003. Israel has served US interests in the Middle East, not the other way around.

Israel has gotten nothing in the bargain. There is only more war, casualties, political risk and a threat to the basis of the economic growth that was carefully built up in the 1990s on high tech industries and international trade and direct investment. Both US and Israeli middle classes have disappeared in the process. Only the elites of both Israeli and US societies gain but not the people. No one discusses this prefering to see the whole affair as a Jewish issue. How myopic and stupid yet typical of the alternet reader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I heard Jimmy Carter on NPR.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 23, 2008 5:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He said that he got the go-ahead from the evil numb-nuts fucks in the State Department to meet with Hamas, and the objection came later, when they stopped pulling their puds long enough to notice that he was serious. Actually, he said something much nicer than that which meant the same thing.

He said that he presented a proposal for peace which included the recognition of Israel as a sovereign state, and the Hamas leaders said, Yes."

I believe him.

Jimmy Carter is a wonderful asset to this country. Long may he run.

I read Palestine-Peace not Apartheid, and I recommend it as a sane, compassionate take on the problems there from someone who knows for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]