Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Sadrists Battle SIIC, Iraqi Troops in Three Cities

By AlterNet Staff, AlterNet. Posted March 25, 2008.


Battles rage as Sadr's cease-fire is stressed to the breaking point.
Advertisement

At least seven killed in fierce fighting between Mahdi army and US-Iraqi troops in crackdown on militia
By Ammar Karim
Middle East Online

Moqtada al-Sadr's militiamen Tuesday battled troops in three Iraqi cities on Tuesday, including the capital, as the hardline Shiite cleric threatened a countrywide campaign of civil revolt.

Heavy clashes broke out between Sadr's Mahdi Army fighters in the southern oil city of Basra, killing at least seven people and wounding 48, as well as in Kut, 175 kilometres (110 miles) southeast of Baghdad, officials said.

As evening fell, Mahdi Army fighters clashed with Iraqi and US forces in their Sadr City bastion in eastern Baghdad, a security official and witnesses said.

Troops had surrounded the sprawling impoverished neighbourhood of two million people and armed Shiite fighters were roaming the streets, a witness said. There were no immediate reports of casualties.

The clashes are the first in Sadr City between the Shiite militia and US troops since October 21, when around 50 people were killed during US raids targeting an Iranian-linked insurgent.

The fighting, which severely strains a ceasefire declared by Sadr in late August and renewed last month, prompted the cleric to issue a stern warning that he would launch protests and a nationwide strike if attacks against his movement and "poor people" are not halted.

"We demand that religious and political leaders intervene to stop the attacks on poor people. We call on all Iraqis to launch protests across all the provinces.

"If the government does not respect these demands, the second step will be general civil disobedience in Baghdad and the Iraqi provinces," Sadr said in a statement read by his representative Hazam al-Aaraji in the holy city of Najaf.

Fighting raged from early morning in areas of Basra controlled by the Mahdi Army as troops and police launched a major crackdown on armed groups in the oil hub, considered the nerve centre of Iraq's national economy.

At least seven people were killed and 48 wounded, among them dozens of members of the Iraqi security forces, according to police and medics.

Fighting in Basra died away late afternoon and the streets were empty even of security force vehicles.

Clashes raged sporadically in Kut as militants fought Iraqi and US forces but there were no immediate reports of casualties.

In August, Sadr ordered a ceasefire following bloody fighting in the shrine city of Karbala blamed on his fighters, which were involved in two rebellions against US forces in 2004.

While Iraqi and US officials say most members of the militia have heeded the order, a number of what the US military terms "rogue elements" continue to attack American forces with mortars, rockets and roadside bombs.

Despite the ceasefire, Mahdi Army members are being subject to raids by the "occupiers" and Iraqi forces which are "destroying Iraqi houses," Sadr's statement said.

"Iraqis in general and Mahdi members in particular are paying the price."

British military officials said Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki was in Basra to personally oversee the major security force sweep in Iraq's second largest city, but that British troops were not taking part.

Fighting involving mortars, machine guns and assault weapons erupted soon after the security forces entered the Al-Tamiyah neighbourhood, a bastion of Sadr's Mahdi Army militia, at around 5:00 am (0200 GMT). The fighting quickly spread to five other Mahdi Army neighbourhoods.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: al fadhila, siic, sadr, iraq



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
This is what I've been talking about
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 25, 2008 2:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for months. Muqtadah al Sadr is the most powerful person in Iraq. When he lifts the lid off the boiling pot and looses the Shia militias and the Mahdi Army that he controls, and stops the ceasefire, all hell will break loose. It isn't a matter of "if" but "when" at this point.

He's pissed at the Iraqi government for being "tools" (yes, I said it) of the US. He's pissed at the US for arming the Sunni militias during his 8-month ceasefire. He's had enough.

Our military will be targeted. We will suffer casualties because of this. And the Iraqi people will suffer even more.

Time to stop this madness and bring our troops home NOW!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Muqtada al-Sadr is criminal
Posted by: democracynowiniraq on Mar 27, 2008 7:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And he should be treated as such by Al-Maliki. Let's make an analogy here, shall we??:

Imagine if the KKK down South had been lynching and burning up minorities and then all of a sudden said, "OK we're gonna be nice for 6 months, we will call a ceasefire, BUT we have demands! We demand that our prisoners be released and we demand representation representation in Congress!" My guess is the US government would tell them to go to hell and say "not only are we keeping your prisoners in prison, we're coming to get your ass as well!"

Al-Sadr and his Mahdi Army are guilty for thousands of Sunni deaths probably near 1,000 American troop deaths. Here's a 35 year-old cleric who's father was killed by Saddam Hussein. If it weren't for Bush, Al Sadr's ass would still be in exile. Am I right or am I right??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]