Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

McCain, Clinton and Obama on Trade: Digging Deeper

By Todd Tucker, Eyes on Trade. Posted March 11, 2008.


Corporate lobbyists, politicians, and ‘free market’ think tanks work hand-in-hand to lock in corporate privileges.

As long promised, we published a report today that Mary Bottari and I wrote that looks in detail at the Clinton, McCain and Obama plans on health care and climate issues. Our focus is on what changes need to be made to the WTO, NAFTA, and other trade pacts to allow for needed policy space in this area. Here's the press release for the report:

To Implement Domestic Campaign Policy Priorities on Health Care and Global Warming, Future Presidents Must Alter Existing U.S. Trade Commitments

New Public Citizen Report Identifies Changes to WTO, NAFTA Rules Needed to Facilitate Candidates' Proposals on Health and Climate

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Public Citizen today identified changes needed to World Trade Organization (WTO) rules and the investment provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to implement a dozen of the presidential candidates' key health and climate policy proposals.

The changes were detailed in a report, "Presidential Candidates' Key Proposals on Health Care and Climate Will Require WTO Modifications, Overreach of WTO Highlighted by Potential Conflicts with Candidates' Non-Trade Proposals," released today, available at http://www.citizen.org/documents/PresidentialWTOreport.pdf

"Growing public ire about our current trade and globalization policies' damage to Americans' economic prospects has played an enormously important role in this election, with most candidates committing to reform NAFTA," said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch division. "But candidates and voters have little idea that some of the candidates' domestic policy priorities on health care and climate change could be limited by the overreach of so-called trade agreements like the World Trade Organization. The need for a comprehensive overhaul of the WTO could not be more urgent."

Although they have nothing to do with trade, key health care cost containment proposals on the creation of health insurance risk pooling mechanisms, reduction of pharmaceutical prices and electronic medical record-keeping, a proposal to expand coverage by requiring large employers to provide health insurance and a proposal to establish tax credits for small employers as an incentive to provide health insurance fall within WTO jurisdiction. In addition, proposals that address climate policy, such as increasing CAFE (Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency) standards, banning incandescent light bulbs, establishing new regulation of coal-fired electric plants and establishing national renewable portfolio standards (RPS), green procurement proposals and green industry subsidies come under the jurisdiction of existing U.S. WTO commitments.

"Corporate lobbyists, previous U.S. presidents, and 'free market' think tanks worked hand-in-hand to lock in corporate privileges on health care, energy and other domestic policies and shield them from small 'd' democratic reforms of the kinds proposed by Clinton, McCain and Obama," said Todd Tucker, research director for Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch division and an author of the report. "Now is the moment presidential candidates must stand up for their important domestic platform priorities and commit to renegotiate the WTO and other flawed trade deals."

Moreover, the candidates haven't addressed the need to renegotiate other provisions in trade deals like the WTO, NAFTA and other NAFTA-style trade deals that severely limit future presidents' policy space to enact legislation on non-trade issues.

"Trying to work within the tiny policy space permitted by existing WTO rules would result in the challenges surrounding America's health care debacle and the global climate crisis being defined so narrowly as to ensure real redress is impossible," said Wallach. "The candidates must reject corporate calls for watering down their proposals and instead emphasize opening up the much-needed policy space to provide real solutions to pressing domestic concerns."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, mccain, obama, clinton, wto, nafta

Todd Tucker is research director with Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
PARLIAMENTARIANS FROM THE THREE NAFTA COUNTRIES ANNOUNCE TASK FORCE ON NAFTA RENEGOTIATION
Posted by: Minutia on Mar 12, 2008 12:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MARCH 6, 2008

WASHINGTON, DC – Following a conference held on March 5th at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, which took a critical look at how NAFTA has impacted the North American region, legislators from Canada, the U.S. and Mexico agreed today to launch a Task Force to push for renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

The Task Force on Renegotiating NAFTA, will be chaired by NDP Trade Critic, Peter Julian (Burnaby-New Westminster), U.S. Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio), the Honourable Yeidckol Polevnsky (Senator for Mexico State and Vice-president of the Mexican Senate), and the Honourable Victor Quintana (Deputy of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico), with support from their respective political parties. Members of the Task Force undertake to promote within their respective legislatures the renegotiation of NAFTA.

The objectives of the Task Force include transforming and rebuilding NAFTA in order to achieve a fair trade policy. This fair trade model is designed to safeguard the sovereignty of the three countries, and includes enforceable measures for the protection of workers and the environment, and allows for all three governments to regulate in the public interest.

“In the United States, Mexico and Canada, income inequality has grown dramatically in the almost fifteen years since the free trade agenda took effect. In Canada, families are worse off today than they were when the first agreement was implemented in 1989,” said Julian. “More and more Canadians work harder without being able to keep up. Over 291,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost in Canada since 2002 with increasing hardships in softwood lumber communities and elsewhere in Canada.”

“NAFTA has sucked good American jobs away, destroyed the Mexican countryside, deepened our immigration crisis, wiped out the Mexican and middle and small business classes, not brought about promised investments in infrastructure, and hammered communities across the continent. It’s time for Mexico, Canada, and the United States to work together to change this flawed trade model”, said Kaptur.

“It is indispensable that legislators from all three North American partner countries work together to design an alternative project that takes into account each nation’s sovereignty, environmental protection, economic competitiveness, migration, and labor rights,” said Polevnsky. “We must work hand in hand with civic organizations to launch a progressive program that considers the well-being of human beings as the raison d’être of public policy. The Mexican Senate is looking forward to host this Trinational Task Force in the near future”, she said.

“I am pleased that our three nations are working together to build better trading partnerships that support the principles of social justice, environmental sustainability, and human rights”, stated NDP Leader, Jack Layton.

Members of the Task Force are scheduled to meet in the spring 2008, at a location to be announced soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The challenge of crystalizing key Election issues
Posted by: kiwijohn on Mar 14, 2008 7:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your focus on these very real and substantive issues represents a very constructive step in lifting both the tone and quality of this year's Presidential Election process.

The key differentiator between this and other substantive Election issues is that in this problem space people don't automatically qualify as self-appointed experts that easily: in Education because they have (had) children at school or have been to school themselves once; in Health because they have been inside a Hospital or have met a health professional; in Foreign Policy because they have been to the Bahamas and so on.

The challenge will be to put this set of complex issues into a language the average voter will understand; to provide information that will motivate voters to differentiate between candidates' positions from a more informed perspective. It is certainly not something that can be achieved in a single article in a single publication. It will take time to build the full picture and gain main-stream media traction.

The pre-requiste for this to occur is committed engagement by a few individuals (with varying political motivation) who have a solid grasp of the underlying problem structure and can articulate the potential consequences of different lines of action.

The concept calls for a well planned communication strategy that first dissects and presents the more fundamental parameters of this extraordinarily complex proposition as simply as possible, avoiding words beyond the comprehension of the target audience. That's not intended as a put down of any group of people, just a reflexion of the fact that scope of vocabulary can be an obstacle in delivering or hearing a message.

Here's a possible sequence of activities to move forward on for now - it will no doubt change if the idea is accepted in principle (I'm not sure who needs to be won-over here, but I'll start with this Alternet space and see what happens.)

1. Identify a handful of interested and qualified subject matter experts to contribute to a wiki with member restricted access. These initial participants would have a track record of passion for the subject area and they would subscribe to the overall objective of 'simplification'.
2. Appoint a moderator for the wiki. Preferably not a subject matter expert and ideally someone with not too much media, particularly blog, baggage in the subject area. Key selection criteria might include evidence of literacy and strategic thinking ability, and, if possible, absence of a track record of pursuing party political agenda.
3. Attend to the mechanics of the wiki setup. (Some nominal funding through sponsorship might also be required by now at the latest)
4. Specify and agree on scope and end goal for the project.
5. Together, analyse the problem space down to basic issue component level.
6. Build a communication strategy with identified milestones and fall-back positions.
7. Build the modular content and then get it out there progressively in a timely manner.

I don't know if this approach is workable. I guess it will largely depend on whether it gains mainstream media attention and particularly that it is on the radar of the Candidates for them to make use of.

Many people I know just roll their eyes to the heavens or scratch their heads when confronted with WTO, NAFTA, FTAs etc.. And the sad truth is that most of us actually know very little about a subject area that will largely define the fortunes of the people of the US for decades. Perhaps this targeted media project could help us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]