Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

For FARC's Sake: Colombia's U.S.-Sponsored Aggression Destabilizing Andean Region

By Richard Gott, AlterNet. Posted March 8, 2008.


The deaths of two senior FARC leaders will stymie the peace process and any hope for release for FARC's hostages.
Advertisement

This article originally appeared on Comment is Free. It is reprinted here with permission of the author.

The deaths of Raúl Reyes and Julián Conrado, two senior figures in the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), are clearly a serious blow to the guerrilla organization. It will now call a halt to the release of hostages held by the FARC in the jungle over many years, a process that had been proceeding slowly under the auspices of the Venezuelan president, Hugo Chávez. Freedom in the short term for the former presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt, in which the French president Nicolas Sarkozy has taken a personal interest, now seems unlikely, and many people believe that she is dying. Hopes of the imminent release of three U.S. defense contractors have also been dashed.

By all accounts, the midnight attack on the camp of the FARC leaders, a mile inside Ecuadorean territory in the jungle region south of the Putumayo River, was a political decision taken by the Colombian president, Alvaro Uribe, to end the peace process orchestrated by Chávez. Four Colombian politicians, held as hostages by the FARC for the past six years, were released last week and given a royal welcome in Caracas. Reyes had been among those who organized their freedom. Killed at the age of 59, Reyes had long been more of a diplomat than a guerrilla commander, though he was often photographed in military fatigues and carrying a gun.

According to the Ecuadorean president, Rafael Correa, the bodies of the FARC commanders and 13 guerrillas were recovered in their pajamas after being bombed while sleeping in a tent on the Ecuadorean side of the frontier. The Colombian air force, Correa claimed, had used advanced technology "with the collaboration of foreign powers" to locate the camp and "to massacre" its occupants. Uribe's government is a close ally of the United States and Israel, whereas Correa belongs to the radical camp led by Chávez. Subsequent to the bombing, Colombian troops crossed the frontier into Ecuador to recover the bodies.

Ever since 9/11, the United States has requested the Colombian government to refer to the FARC as a "terrorist" organization, a word also now used by the European Union. Yet the Colombian guerrillas are the most long-lasting of all such movements in Latin America, long predating the current obsession with "terrorism." Their leader, Manuel Marulanda, first led the FARC in the early 1960s and has survived into the 21st century, while Raúl Reyes had run the organization's political wing for many years. A well-known negotiator and promoter of the FARC's cause in meetings in Europe and Latin America, Reyes was a crucial collaborator in the recent efforts by the Venezuelan president and Colombian Senator Piedad Córdoba to release some of the Colombian hostages.

The FARC has witnessed many changes over the past 40 years, but none of them has affected its ability to survive. One change has been the increasing production in Colombia of the raw material for cocaine and heroin, fueling the drug markets of the United States and Europe, which was once grown in Bolivia and Peru. Land in Colombia devoted to growing cannabis, coca and poppies has grown fivefold since the 1960s, and the FARC has long provided protection to the rural workers on these plantations, as well as exacting tribute from the drug barons.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: colombia, u.s., andes

Richard Gott is a writer and historian. Among his recent books are Cuba: A New History and Hugo Chávez and the Bolivarian Revolution.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Attacks on Ecuadorian sovereignty not new
Posted by: halrivers on Mar 8, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US-Colombian invasion of Ecuadorian territory was not the first encroachment by Plan Colombia on Ecuador’s sovereignty. It is, in part, a punishment for Ecuador’s increasing freedom from the grip of US economic and military policy. In some reporting I did for the magazine NACLA Report on the Americas back in 1999, I found that Ecuador’s ministries of Foreign Relations and Defense had made the case for the base in Manta using blatantly transparent US talking points: Ecuador depended on exports to the US; Ecuador had graduated from transit route to producer of illicit drugs (a dubious proposition); Ecuador needed to show its heart was in the anti-drug struggle; and Ecuador should be proud that it was selected because it had no “serious problems of violence and terrorism.” It was soon obvious, however, that Manta was to be used for other US strategic interests than drug trafficking. A 1999 report by the Ecuadorian Joint Military Command urged collaboration with the Colombian military to protect US oil facilities in the border area. Plan Colombia unleashed right wing paramilitaries on the Cofan, a people living on both sides of frontier, driving them to safety with their Ecuadorian cousins.
Resistance came in the form of the Indigenous uprising of 2001, led by National Indigenous Confederation of Ecuador (CONAIE) president Antonio Vargas. Among the economic and political demands acceded to by then Ecuadorian President Gustavo Naboa was to begin the process of withdrawing from Plan Colombia. Not until the election of Rafael Correa, however, did this demand really begin to be implemented.
I suspect that some of the suspicion levied by the Ecuadorian press against Correa’s cutting of diplomatic relations with Colombia is connected to the long-standing collaboration of the US with the Ecuadorian elite.
Links to the stories I wrote for NACLA and the novel I wrote about Ecuador and the US in the age of Clinton (The Mother Earth Inn) can be found at www.phillipbannowsky.com.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

quelle surprise!
Posted by: davidg on Mar 8, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should inspire more reading of Stephen Kinzer's books such as "Overthrow," "Bitter Fruit"," and "All the Shah's Men." And talking about them. To everybody.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

U.S. Proxy War
Posted by: Quannah on Mar 8, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As soon as I heard of the border incursions, I immediately smelled a "Proxy War" waged by... you guessed it, the US.

Bush was pissed about the good press Hugo Chavez received when FARC released the hostages, and would do anything to "knock him down a peg or two." Bush hates Chavez. He will continue to try to discredit him any way he can, and his good buddies in Colombia are more than willing to help him do it.

I did see last night where the presidents of Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela all met and shook hands. Maybe this will blow over. But I see Bush/Cheney fingerprints all over this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» cojones Posted by: openhouse
The FARC are terrorists. NO MAS FARC
Posted by: farcterroristas on Mar 8, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author, Richard Gott, is an extreme leftist and obviously a FARC supporter. Search his bio on Wikipedia and you will indeed see how far left he is. There is mention of Stalin, Che Guevara and the KGB. Mr. Gott praises Hugo Chavez for being insrumental in the release of Colombian hostages from the FARC. The releases were depicted as "humanitarian", but were actually a mutual political stunt between Chavez and the FARC to enhance whatever image they desire to have with the international community. The FARC once had a social and political agenda 40 years ago which was practical and honorable. Now they are just a gang of terrorists, thugs, kidnappers, murderers, and drug dealers who hide behind the vail of a social agenda that is now extinct. I am an American who lived in the mountains of southern Colombia for four years in the late 90s and I can attest to the terror that the Colombian people have had to live with in the last 20 to 30 years. It is clear to me that President Uribe did not order the cross border strike on the FARC to derail the hostage negotiations, as Mr. Gott would have you believe. Uribe ordered the strike into Ecuador because its president, Corea, was allowing the FARC to use Ecuador as a safe sanctuary from which it could attack Colombia's military. It is now clear from documents seized from the FARC after the raid, that both Chavez and Corea have some explaining to do to Colombia and the international community about their association with the FARC terrorists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FARC is useful for playing U.S. politics
Posted by: PaulK on Mar 8, 2008 4:22 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I assume that the U.S. ordered Colombian forces over the border into Ecuador at midnight because it would play well in the USA. This is an election year.

The Neocon Republicans need enemies. Al Qaeda needs enemies. FARC needs enemies. I now pronounce you man and wives.

How does this play on Faux News? I suspect they toed (toad?) the Republican line. U.S. (oops, friendly non-US) forces invaded the Parrot's Beak area of Cambodia and destroyed two top Viet Cong generals. Furthermore they recovered a laptop, on which illiterate Colombian soldiers instantly found the missing $300 million dollar link between FARC and Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez. Hillary would never have the guts to try this ploy, so vote for McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Corpirate Army is headed South.
Posted by: williameon on Mar 9, 2008 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The War must go on.
What else is there?
Where would we get our daily fix?
Of violence?
Print more money.
Hurry Honey!
Before
The Dollar runs out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A dose of skepticism
Posted by: HSencillo on Mar 13, 2008 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up in Guatemala. I lived through the newspaper stories and the whisper campaigns and the attitude that the atrocities were done by los izquierdistas, delincuentes, terroristas, esos mafufu (mafiosos) marihuaneros, and, of course, esos comunistas. It never made sense to me because it defied common sense . But I withheld judgment and said nothing, since ¿how could one prove otherwise? A decade later, investigative reporting by Guatemalans and norteamericanos, and the FOIA, nailed the proxista-backed paramilitares and the police forces as perps of 97% of the atrocities including massacres of women and children in cold blood and the corraling of 90 people in a dipl. building under a peace ruse, locking them in, and setting fire to them. That happened three blocks from my house. That was the police who did that. Not the revolucionarios. That event changed my mind forever. I could never take a gringo seriously again.

To thems those who is commenting here that Gott is an ultra-leftist for noting the weirdly familiar pattern of terrorist tactics, bombings, kidnappings, and so forth;

- to them that sez Gott is a commie-lover for labeling Reyes a [in scare-quotes] diplomat--which he was; diplomats negotiate, plain and simple;

- and to them those thats agrees with these assessments of Gott's motives as so-termed bias:

[1] you ain't been there, you ain't seen it, you don't know it, and are thoroughly ideologized punks;

[2] "ultra"-anything is withered and dead, argumentatively discrediting Cold War propaganda terminology; and

[3] damned straight the writer is biased. Who isn't? Ah!, yes, thoroughly ideologized punks are not biased. Natch.

One singular point: Gringos and Brits started this blood-shed and the terrorism shit that is merely responded to as fire with fire. Latin America does not, and never has, exported nor sought empire. Get used to it.

Chávez scares the living shit out of gringos. Why? Because he and his ideals have the potential of living as long as Ché in memory and Castro in flesh, both outlasting and outliving gringo hypocrisy and ignorance of the ways of the world. Not to mention countless American [sic] men, women, and children who died bloody deaths in the labor repressions of the last century. America's [sic] ersatz democracy is simply the kitschy crap horseshit it's sold as. It's blood money, bought and paid for by US tax dollars and US thinktank underwriters. Latin America ain't buyin' it no more. That's why proxy wars are needed by the State Department.

Believe whatever conspiracy theories you wish, but un ignorante se nota por las babosadas que erutan de sus labios -- a fool is easily spotted by uncriticalities burping past his lips.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]