Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Agent Orange Deforming a Third Generation in Vietnam

By Tom Fawthrop, Comment Is Free. Posted February 13, 2008.


Washington denies responsibility for the effects of chemical warfare, fearing that legal precedent may limit future military endeavors.
Advertisement

Long after the last bullet has been fired in a war, unexploded bombs, landmines and toxic chemicals continue to maim and kill civilians. This is particularly true of the Vietnam war. Three decades after US soldiers and diplomats scrambled aboard the last planes out of Saigon in April 1975, the toxins they left behind still poison Vietnam. Relations with the United States have been normalized since the 1990s, but the denial of justice to the victims of Agent Orange remains a major bone of contention.

Not only are Vietnamese still maimed from treading on unexploded bombs, they are also victims of this insidious scourge that poisons water and food supplies, causing various cancers and crippling deformities. Eighty million liters of Agent Orange were sprayed on the jungles of Vietnam, destroying swathes of irreplaceable rainforest through massive defoliation and leaving a toxic trail of dioxin contamination in the soil for decades. The legacy of this chemical warfare can even be inflicted on the unborn, with Agent Orange birth deformities now being passed on to a third generation.

In the 3,160 villages in the southern part of Vietnam within the Agent Orange spraying zone, 800,000 people continue to suffer serious health problems and are in need of constant medical attention. Last month, members of a US Vietnamese working group reported that it will cost at least $14 million to remove dioxin residues from just one site around the former US airbase in Danang. The cost of a comprehensive clean-up around three dioxin hot spots and former US bases is estimated at around $60 million. The $3 million pledged by US Congress last year is a pathetically inadequate amount set against the billions spent in waging war and deploying weapons of mass destruction.

The recent study of one Agent Orange hot spot, the former US airbase in Danang, found dioxin levels 300 to 400 times higher than internationally accepted limits. The study confirmed that rainwater had carried dioxin into city drains and into a neighboring community that is home to more than 100,000 people.

Dr Arnold Schecter, a leading expert in dioxin contamination in the US, sampled the soil around former US airbase in Bien Hoa in 2003 and found dioxin levels that were 180 times above the safe level set by the US environmental protection agency. The US government was aware of these findings (pdf) back in 2003.

The US government's Veterans Administration officially recognizes 13 medical conditions linked to Agent Orange and provides free medical treatment to US soldiers who can prove their exposure to the herbicide. But Washington has adamantly denied all responsibility and evaded any kind of accountability for the estimated four million Vietnamese soldiers and civilians who suffered far greater exposure to the dioxin than the US war veterans.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: veterans, birth defects, washington, vietnam, agent orange, vietnam war

A London-born journalist, Tom Fawthrop has extensively covered the developing world. He has been working in South-East Asia for the past 25 years and is currently based in Chiangmai, Thailand.

He is co-author of Getting away with Genocide, the history of the Cambodia Tribunal.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Colin Powell told the UN that no country had more chemical warfare experience than Saddam's Iraq
Posted by: Suzon on Feb 13, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anybody know what he was doing during our time in Vietnam?

An end to illegal and immoral occupation of someone else's country doesn't mean an end to human suffering. Survivors and their descendants may be more unfortunate than the dead.

The militiary-industrial complex has an immoral history but it is also protected by lawyers, in the courtroom, in Congress and in the White House.

Progressives are aware that the public has been manipulated by certain fearmongers. What needs to become better known is that the fearmongers themselves are subject to their own fears. Of what? Of the possibility that one day justice may be done.

Perhaps we would be wise to offer clemency to CEOs and their political enablers in exchange for an end to our weapons industry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Next up, depleted uranium
Posted by: beefee on Feb 13, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason the government won't admit culpability in its use of agent orange is that it has a bigger problem on its hands with depleted uranium, which is showing signs of destroying human lives at a much faster rate than agent orange did. I can remember watching a television news show during the time of "Shock and Awe" with a pumped up Marine playing rock music in the background, one leg up on some type of missile, bragging that "This baby has depleted uranium in it..." I'd like to know if that young, idealistic man still thinks that DU is a great thing now, that is, if he's even alive. The war economy is destroying the earth, it's people and the future. Shame on those who profit by keeping war alive. This isn't about religion. This is about money. Those who pray to the God of money hoodwink those who pray to Gods and use them at their disposal to wreak havoc around the world. All I can say is that you can't take it with you when the Almighty comes to get you. You're just another schmuck in line, waiting to see if you can get into the pearly gates and if the view in your rear view mirror is a path of lies and destruction, do you really think you're going to heaven?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Next up, depleted uranium Posted by: willymack
You can assist Agent Orange victims
Posted by: John McAuliff on Feb 13, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1) Push your Senators and Representative as well as your preferred Presidential candidate for the US government to accept moral responsibility for the legacies of an unjust war, including both environmental cleanup and victim assistance.

2) Contribute directly to private programs that assist innocent victims and their families in Vietnam to deal with enduring hardship.

3) If you travel to Vietnam, visit one of the many local and international projects addressing this problem with volunteers and limited resources.

For more information, go to www.warlegacies.org or www.ffrd.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

masters of war
Posted by: Lector on Feb 13, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Curious how many candidates running for president today have ties with Dow and Monsanto who were given the task of attacking and destroying the natural order of a country. Hillary is or was one. The photographs of the deformed children today are too unbearable to print and would poison your sleep, the monstrous births but let’s remember the real monsters in this tale of horrors, Robert McNamara and Henry Kissinger who calmly gave the orders… Agent Orange will not become history, it goes on today, will go on; US chemical companies are involved in deep research for the endless wars the terror mongers foresee.

Pointless

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

this won't stop wingnuts from calling war criminals like McCain a war hero
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Feb 13, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who willingly participated in US war crimes known as Vietnam war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

.
Posted by: WhatNow? on Feb 13, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The US government, in refusing to sign up to the international criminal court, has ensured that they are beyond the reach of international law."

They better hope their time doesn't run out like it did for some other monsters in 1945.

""This does affect our ongoing diplomacy," he said, citing the use of depleted uranium shells by US forces in Iraq."

This guy is truly sick! How does one equate the use of DU as diplomacy? Operations would have been a better word to use. It's amazing the doublespeak these scumbags come up with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HA
Posted by: xenocyd on Feb 13, 2008 10:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"This does affect our ongoing diplomacy," he said, citing the use of depleted uranium shells by US forces in Iraq.

Ha, diplomacy! How do maniacs like this get successful? I know, I know -- this one's just a lawyer. But this kind of language borders on pyschopathic behavior.

Our forefathers had enough foresight to separate church and state. I tell everyone, it is time to separate FORCE and state. In a real future, any nation found to be producing or financing weaponry will have the people responsible stripped from office immediately, incarcerated as the criminals they are, and their projects immediately shut down.

Letting murder-happy lunatics run government and support that kind of lunacy in business as well... it has to end. The time of governments granting themselves the ability to support death an destruction will hopefully one day just be an embarassing history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Vietman Viet
Posted by: Thom41 on Feb 13, 2008 12:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You fuckers.........Was a member of the Marine Corps who was sprayed........what about me? I am no better than the citizens of Vietman. Our Government used me..............and abused me.....for what? Thom

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Vietman Viet Posted by: Doubtom
So what's oil
Posted by: donl51 on Feb 14, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but an environmental disaster!need I say more!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]