Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Iran and Bush's Crisis of Truth

By Peter Dyer, Middle East Online. Posted January 29, 2008.


Iran is not run by saints, but it has never threatened the U.S. or invaded another country.
Advertisement

"Iran is a threat to world peace." Iran is "the world's leading sponsor of terror." So declared President Bush in his recent trip to the Middle East. Iran, he said, is seeking to "intimidate its neighbors with ballistic missiles and bellicose rhetoric."

By now most of us are familiar with the President's feelings and rhetoric concerning Iran. They have a familiar ring. They sound a lot like the buildup to the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Recently the Center for Public Integrity, a non-profit investigative reporting institution, published a report: "Iraq: the War Card." The report documented 935 false statements made by President Bush and seven top administration officials in the two years following September 11, 2001 concerning the national security threat posed by Iraq to the US

The top liar was the President. He made, according to the report, 232 false statements about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and 28 false statements about Iraq's links with al-Qaeda.

In this light we should examine carefully any statement the President makes concerning Iranian threats to world peace.

A look at a map of the region helps put things in perspective. We see that Iran has 13 "next-door neighbors." Seven share land borders with Iran while six countries lie directly across the Persian Gulf.

Of these 13 all but five (Oman, Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan) contain US military bases. Of these five, Oman and the US negotiated a 10-year agreement in 2000 which gives the US access to three Omani air fields.

The other four neighbors are all recipients of US aid. Pending congressional approval, this will include President Bush's recent offer to Saudi Arabia of a $20 billion arms package.

Two of Iran's neighbors, Afghanistan and Iraq, have recently been invaded and occupied by the US. Another neighbor, Pakistan, is a nuclear power and a US ally in the "Global War on Terror." Another nuclear power and US ally, Israel, lies within striking distance of Iran.

In the Persian Gulf, according to the US Navy Times, the US is currently deploying an aircraft carrier strike group and two expeditionary strike groups.

A partial list of this force includes an aircraft carrier; two amphibious assault ships; three guided-missile frigates; four guided-missile cruisers; six-guided missile destroyers; two dock landing ships; two amphibious transport dock ships; and two fast-attack submarines (one deployed independently of any strike group).

In sum, Iran is nearly encircled by the air, land and naval forces of the world's most powerful military.

Iran may not be run by saints. No country is. But Iran has never threatened the US. Nor has Iran ever invaded another country. The Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has pledged there will be no Iranian nuclear weapons, nor will Iran start a war.

On the other hand, preemptive war is now openly acknowledged to be an "option" in US political/military strategy. We demonstrated this convincingly when we invaded Iraq -- a country which had never harmed us, was not preparing to harm us and had never even threatened to harm us.

Nevertheless we initiated a conflict which has, to date, killed at least 150,000 and created 4,000,000 refugees.

Invading a country which has not threatened the invader is aggression: the "supreme international crime," according to the Nuremberg Tribunal.

Whether Iranian President Ahmadinejad, who is not the ultimate decision maker in Iran, has threatened to "wipe Israel off the map" is open to debate. It is not open to debate, however, that both Israel and the US have repeatedly threatened to attack Iran.

Despite all this President Bush continues to assert that Iran is a threat to world peace and the world's leading sponsor of terror.

The President appears to be using the same strategy which worked so well in 2002-2003: simply to repeat falsehoods until a majority of Americans believe them.

He appears to be gambling that we are either so apathetic or so foolish we will accept the lies and approve yet another war. Unfortunately, based on his past experience, it may not be a bad gamble.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, bush, insanity

Peter Dyer is a journalism student who moved with his wife from California to New Zealand in 2004.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Iran is just having fun!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jan 29, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""But Iran has never threatened the US.""

I think this article either ignores the reality of the relationship beetween Iran and the US/Western World or is ignorant of them (which I doubt)

1) US hostage Crises - The unseating of Carter

2) Iran's seizure of 15 British Navy personnel in Iraqi coastal waters - """In an earlier day, what Iran has done would have been universally regarded as an act of war. It was a premeditated act, carried out only hours before Britain voted to stiffen sanctions against Iran for its nuclear program in a unanimous U.N. Security Council resolution"" (WSJ)
3) hostage taking of westerners in Beirut in the 1980s
4) Supplying weapons that are used to kill US troops in Iraq.
5) aggressive harassment of US ships in international waters

""The mullahs might even hope any fighting would embolden Democrats to do Tehran's bidding by passing legislation that forbids the Administration from attacking Iran without prior Congressional permission.""" - can they actually use our democrats to their advantage?

How does Iran respond to power?

"""It is worth recalling, however, that Iran was at its most diplomatically pliant after the United States sank much of Tehran's navy after Iran tried to disrupt oil traffic in the Persian Gulf in the late 1980s. Regimes that resort to force the way Iran does tend to be respecters of it"" (WSJ article again)

No doubt war with Iran is insane - they will develop a nuclear weapon, make fools of those in this country that say they aren't (much of our democratic party - though Obama seems to be able to play hardball with them. One has to consider the danger of Iran run by extreme Islamics with a nuke.

"Muscle flexing" is a good thing - regime change, through peaceful means there is a better thing for the entire region!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» more misconceptions here Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: more misconceptions here Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: more misconceptions here Posted by: Gungneir
wrong button!
Posted by: phindrup on Jan 29, 2008 5:23 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I intended to rate the previous comment as five!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

explanation
Posted by: phindrup on Jan 29, 2008 5:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am referring to 'more misconceptions here'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Selective amnesia
Posted by: Ydotheyhateus on Jan 29, 2008 8:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The history of relationship between Iran and US/UK starts from 1953 i.e. when US/UK collaborated to overthrow a democratically elected government of Mossadeq and installed he brutal dictatorship of Shah.

US then trained Shah's secret police SAVAK that was responsible for torturing and killing thousands in order to prop up the US/UK puppet regime.

Then comes revolution and Shah runs off. US provides sanctuary to its criminal client with blood of thousands of innocent civilians.

US embassey hostage crisis took place in this context.

US/Western powers then pushed Saddam in to invading Iran, and provided Saddam with much needed WMD to fight the Iranians.

And lastly, the terrorist act of USS Viencenes blowing up of Iran Air flight 655 over the persian gulf killing over 200 civilians.

But Iran is a threat to "world peace"? World peace must be Orwellian for "Western Corporate intersts"....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Selective amnesia Posted by: Mae-121
Looking From The Other Side
Posted by: lookingfromtheotherside on Jan 29, 2008 11:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I totally agree with the contents of the original article and the last comment by Ydotheyhateus about the history of the tension between Iran and the US/UK. After the 1953 coup by CIA Shah came back to Iran and started a 26 year period of ruthless ruling. In the years following the coup, thousands of young intellectuals, university students and professors, and Army officers that had supported Dr. Mosaddegh, the democratically elected prime minister, were jailed and executed and the country entered a dark period of fear and tyranny in which neighbors were afraid of neighbors and every petty criminal wearing the military uniform or a government badge could suppress any voice of opposition by invoking the fear of disobeying the chain of command that ascended to Shah himself stopping just short of God!

Considering that these events for a good part coincided with the Korean and Vietnam wars that triggered worldwide anger towards America as an embodiment of a blood thirsty imperialistic power, Iranian intellectuals had double the reasons of their piers elsewhere to detest American government and its policies. The seize of the US embassy and hostage taking of its employees in Tehran was the act of a small group of maverick Islamist students that later branded themselves as the "Muslim Student followers of the way of Imam (Ayatollah Khomeini)".
Although the moderate forces within the revolutionary government could see the long term damages of this action to the country and did what they could to settle this problem quickly, to the point that the prime minister of the time, Mehdi Bazargan, submitted his resignation in protest, the climate of the society with the rooted dismay of American meddling was such that the public easily bought to the propaganda spread by the radical factions close to Ayatollah Khomeini.

The following events, including the failed rescue mission by the US, all played to the hands of the radical elements to humiliate the authority of the US more and secure their place in Khomeini's government.

(Please see the next comment for the rest)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iran/US Tensions, Facts and Fictions
Posted by: lookingfromtheotherside on Jan 30, 2008 12:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is no secret that Saddam Hissein's invasion to the Iranian soil in the following months was, to say the least, with the understanding of US's favorable position. Saddam was helped and funded by America and most European countries, Soviet Union, and all of the US friendly Arab regimes throughout the 8 years of war. He received advanced weaponry including Soviet Mig 21 fighter jets and Scud B surface to surface missiles, French made Mirage fighter airplanes, ingredients for chemical weapons (Germany?), satellite images of the Iranian troop movements from American spy satellites and areal images taken by American made Avax flying radars sold to Sauidi's probably just for this purpose. Above all, the entire world just sat down and looked when Saddam used chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and later Iraqi Kurds.

When the war did not turn out the way anticipated by Saddam and his supporters, and Iranians pushed back and seemed prevailing, in the final year of the war the US warship (Vincent?) stationed in Persian Gulf fired a missile to an Iranian commercial airliner killing all of its 270+ passengers. Later on the commander of the ship received a medal of honor from the president Reagan. Also in the weeks leading to the end of the war, the US navy engaged Iranian warships and sank 6 Iranian vessels, while Kuwait, then an Iraqi ally, let Saddam's troops launch their final aggression against Iranians from its soil, the Kuwaiti island of Bamian.

Besides all of these direct atrocities that led to the death and permanently disabling of nearly 750,000 Iranian young men, the long lasting effect of the war became the tightening of the grip of the Isamist radicals on power. The same Mullah's and radicals like Ahmadinejad that US and allies complain about today came to seize the power by suppressing every opposing voice in the post revolutionary era by using the universal tactics that have helped Bush and neocons silence their opponents: the fear of enemy and concern for national security!!

The latest and most significant act in the US play against democracy movement in Iran was probably president Bush's categorization of the country as a part of the axis of evil in his state of union speech in 2003, that completely disarmed the student movement and reconciliatory reformist government of president Mohammad Khatami against the hardline factions of the Iranian politics. It led to the rise of the hardliners to the power, symbolized by the presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

To my memory, the US government has never apologized for any of the pain that it has inflicted on Iranian people and the democracy movement during several decades (starting with the 1953 CIA coup). Neither it has ever or taken any responsibility for its role in driving the most thriving and progressive country of the Middle East, to an isolated, paranoid, militaristic state that is Iran today. Instead, it still plays victim over the 444 day hostage taking crisis that took place 28 years ago and is quick to cry wolf about the imminent threat of Iran's ballistic missiles to the world freedom and civilization!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]