Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Citigroup's Mexican Cronies

By Jeff Faux, The Nation. Posted December 4, 2007.


How Citigroup/Banamex got control of an entire airline from the Mexican Government for a song, and paid for it, in part, out of huge subsidies it receives from ... the Mexican government.
Advertisement

With estimates of the losses from the subprime mortgage fiasco spiraling past $100 billion, Citigroup, Bank of America and similar citadels of financial genius are deep in a huddle with the Treasury over some sort of rescue operation. Pundits are shocked at the prospect of taxpayers bailing out companies whose middle managers are distraught if their year-end bonuses come to less than seven figures. After all, deregulation and global competition was supposed to banish the cozy relationship between big business and big government that justifies corporate welfare under the slogan "Too Big to Fail."

But a look just south of the border--where Citigroup has also been making headlines--reminds us that crony capitalism is not some anomaly that rears its hypocritical head in times of financial crisis. It is built into the DNA of multinational banking.

On October 17 the Mexican government announced that a syndicate organized by Banamex, Citigroup's Mexican subsidiary, had bid for and won at auction Aeroméxico, the country's largest airline. Having bailed out Aeroméxico's former owners eighteen years ago, the government owned a majority of the company's stock, which it was now privatizing.

The news was accompanied by photo-ops of smiling bureaucrats shaking hands with happy plutocrats from the Citigroup/Banamex syndicate. Frontman for the syndicate is José Luis Barraza, a major fundraiser for Mexican President Felipe Calderón. Barraza financed the vicious campaign attack ads against leftist candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador, which were a major factor in Calderón's narrow and possibly fraudulent victory last year. A Mexican court later acknowledged that the ads were illegal but with a straight face declared that they didn't affect the outcome of the election--won by 0.5 percent of the vote.

Shortly after the announcement of the Aeroméxico sale, it leaked out that Citigroup/Banamex had not been the highest bidder. Less than three minutes after its bid, the government was offered a higher price by a group headed by a businessman to whom the Mexican president did not owe any favors. The Calderonistas disqualified the higher bid on the grounds that it had come too late, i.e., after a deadline that Citigroup/Banamex had insisted the government impose. The decision violated the law, which forbids arbitrary closing of a privatization auction under such circumstances. When the losing bidder was asked if he was going to sue, he declined. He had plenty of evidence the deal was rigged, he said, but the fix was in, and there was no way he could beat the Citigroup-government alliance in a Mexican court.

As one Mexican newspaper put it, Citigroup/Banamex got control of an entire airline for practically the price of one new advanced-design airplane. Moreover, at least part of the money Citigroup/Banamex is paying the Mexican government for Aeroméxico comes from huge subsidies the bank is already receiving from--you guessed it--the Mexican government.

In 1982, when the peso crashed, the government bought Banamex as a way of rescuing the bank and its Mexican owners from bankruptcy. In 1991 Mexican President Carlos Salinas resold it for $4.6 billion to a business group headed by a close ally, Roberto Hernández. Two years later Salinas signed the North American Free Trade Agreement, which included a timetable for dismantling Mexico's law against foreign ownership of its commercial banks. The foremost champion of NAFTA in the Clinton White House was economic adviser Robert Rubin, formerly co-chair of Goldman Sachs. When another peso crisis hit Mexico in 1994, Rubin, then US Treasury Secretary, financed a bailout of the Wall Street holders of Mexican bonds. As part of the complex deal, Salinas's successor, Ernesto Zedillo, agreed to accelerate the opening up of Mexican banks to foreigners.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: workplace, crony capitalism, international capital, citigroup

Jeff Faux is the founder and former president of the Economic Policy Institute and the author of the new book The Global Class War, a study of the impact of globalization abroad and on U.S. living standards and politics.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Case of Banamex is a symptom of globalization in the realm of finance.
Posted by: yellow on Dec 6, 2007 3:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Banamex/Citigroup story has its roots in the mid-1990s peso crisis. The early nationalization of the Mexican banking system in 1982 in response to a phenomenal debt crisis was an attempt to get the financial crisis under control without allowing the countries entire economy to become a ward of the IMF and the international banking consortium. Mexico experienced decent economic growth levels during this time and the growth of small business in Mexico, the major source of non-agricultural employment, grew markedly until the mid-1990s peso crisis which threatened massive amounts of capital flight, an incredible devaluation of the peso and a possible default on Mexico's massive foreign debt. Then Treasury Secretary under Clinton, Bob Rubin, organized a $50 billion bailout of the Mexican Banking system to save foreign creditors from default and stabilized the peso at 6 pesos/dollar. The bailout came with a huge price.

Over the next several years the Banking system was privatized, first being purchased by local capital and later sold off to foreigners like Citibank which now owns Banamex. One of the immediate consequences was a dry up of local lending to small Mexican businesses which employ the bulk of the Mexican workforce. Bank lending to the Mexican private sector declined markedly in the late 1990s from about 25% of the GDP in 1996 to about 6.6% in 2000. The collapse of small business as a result and the globalization of the Mexican economy under NAFTA, whose terms enabled and encouraged much of this activity, was the main reason for the sudden boom in Mexican out migration to the US over the past ten years. The local investors that sold off the privatized banks to foreigners, which they got at low prices due to the banks financial crisis, got rich. The current foreign controlled banking system is far more committed to paying down the foreign debt than to internal Mexican development.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]