Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

The Real Reason People Fear Evo Morales

By Roberto Lovato, New America Media. Posted October 3, 2007.


It's not just that President Evo Morales is indigenous, but that he refuses to sell out the rights of indigenous people.
Advertisement

"Why are you going to go listen to that idiot? That racist indio (Indian) can't even talk during interviews," snarled my blonde-haired, green eyed Cuban friend when I told him I'd be covering the visit of Bolivian President Evo Morales. He was clearly unhappy with the friendship between Morales and Fidel Castro. My friend was not alone.

Here in the North, the Bush administration regularly denies visas to indigenous, mestizo (mixed Spanish and Indian), and even white members of Morales' cabinet. In the South, meanwhile, right-wing Peruvian novelist Mario Vargas Llosa recently published an article about Morales titled, "A New Racism Approaches the Region: Indians Against Whites."

"To put the Latin American problem in racial terms as do some demagogues is senseless and irresponsible," said Vargas Llosa.

Indian power ruffles feathers in the modern world.

The first time I saw Morales during his visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly meeting this week, he was suited up as a midfielder in a soccer match on the Lower East Side. Though impressed by some of what I'd heard about the very smart reform agenda of the first indigenous head of state in Bolivia -- a majority indigenous country -- in 500 years, the journalist in me in was skeptical about political theater, even if it took the form of soccer, the only sport I really like.

Yet, even from a distance, he looked very much at ease, undistracted from his game despite the blaring cacharpaya (traditional Andean music) or the throngs of Bolivianos screaming "Evo!" at his slightest pass or shot. I asked Mathilde Lazcano, a Bolivian psychologist and social worker who has met Morales and who worked among indigenous populations for more than 20 years, why people were so effusive about Evo. "For most of our lives, the indigenas, the poor of our country could not express ourselves. I'm here because he (and) his movement brought to life my work," she said, adding, "He's the real thing."

After the match, which his team won despite the presidente's missing a penalty kick, he was whisked by his soccer-uniformed security crew through the crowd. He stopped for a moment and stood right near me. I studied his lanky frame, his straight hair and aquiline nose. Most striking were his intense, but warm brown eyes. He looked like a more genial version of the Geronimo pictures I grew up with. He looked "integro" or "integral" as some of my most respected Salvadoran revolutionary friends called those personifying the highest political -- and personal -- ideals. But my biggest surprise was when I saw how tall he was. Most Bolivianos I grew up with were short mestizos like the Chavez brothers who played on a soccer team my not-so-PC brothers in San Francisco's Mission district named the "Conquistadores" or (Spanish) "Conquerors." Like them, it was easier for me to identify with the Spanish and nationalist side of the mestizo equation than with the indigenous side.

The 5-foot-10-inch Evo came, it seems, to turn over the tortilla of our consciousness about Indians, race and power -- and about ourselves.

When I saw him on stage during a speech he gave the next day at the historic Great Hall of the Cooper Union, he started looking even taller. He nervously began by telling us that he was honored to stand at a podium where the likes of honest Abe Lincoln (another lanky president) have stood. But unlike Lincoln, he located himself in relation to not just the "intellectual and professional" and "western" tradition of power but also to the 2,000-year-old collective political tradition of the Aymara people he descended from. "For 500 years," said Morales, "we have had patience."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bolivia, latin america, evo morales, indigenous rights

Roberto Lovato, a frequent Nation contributor, is a New York-based writer with New America Media.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Vargas Llosa and racist populism
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Oct 3, 2007 3:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although I dont usually agree with Mario Vargas Llosa, his writings, both the fiction and political, are always a pleasure to read. He is a self declared conservative but never a trend follower who would trade independence for acceptability. A political contestant in his country two decades ago, when he backed Toledo, he did it because of his own political stance and because the change he represented from the "neoliberal", authoritarian Fujimori. Regular contributor to spanish leading liberal newspaper El Pais, expert in the Middle East conflict, officially recognized with the Jerusalem order as "friend of Israel" but also critic of Israeli policies towards Palestine... He is far more than a right-wing Peruvian novelist

When he warns of the racist edge on present populism in latinoamerica, he is not speaking from fear but worry. The same worry Ive heard many latinoamericans express. First I also dismissed those oppinion as coming from the wealthy who had more to lose, but the trickle of news and a closer look to the political process that is taking place in those countries made me share their worries.

Democratically elected, there populist goverments become autoritarian very soon if not inmediatly. Military seizing key assets instead of following a legal procedure (or even changing the law prior to the seizing) destroy the separation of power any democracy must be based on. While everyone simpatizes with a poor country regaining control of its natural resources, when done in an unlawful way it destroys the empire of the law. Things still happen because the goverment forces them to happen its way, people still cant rely on law to uphold their rights.

And there is a stink of racism. Much a la Ugandan, race and not class becomes the enemy of the poor/indian. There is an identification of indians in their discourse with what's morally right, and of white/mixed/spaniard with wrong. And while its obviously right the ruling class was always white or mestiza, the equation is corrupt. And dangerous, and inherently violent. Because when the general consensus accept a whole group of people is wrong because of their color or religion, there is little they can do to absolve their collective "sin". They become the eternal scapegoat and soon, the victims.

And as far as I understand, bringing justice never had anything to do with creating a new set of victims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Vargas Llosa and racist populism Posted by: El Hombre Malo
» RE: Vargas Llosa and racist populism Posted by: El Hombre Malo
» RE: Vargas Llosa and racist populism Posted by: El Hombre Malo
» The Empire Of Law... Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Vargas Llosa and racist populism Posted by: El Hombre Malo
as we creep up on columbus day (Native American day)....
Posted by: ellie on Oct 3, 2007 4:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
reading this morning about Morales is a breath of fresh air.... as Elizabeth Cook-Lynn once said; "... we (American Indian people) do not want reconciliation without righting the wrongs of the past, we do not accept your empty apology ...", saying sorry to Indian people for genocide, theft and corruption, outright racism, educational limitations and hate crimes today in 2007, placing many of our relatives in absolute poverty and danger.... the list goes on and on....

my point is that Morales has a traditional Indian thought process going to shape his country's future, cyclical, not linear, giving his country, his people, the main voice in how to govern, his policies in and of themselves could be seen as a true threat to north america, especially the current US administration...

as Indian People of the Americas, when will the others realize we overall, do not want to assimilate into your culture, but want a paraell culture with the same voice as the assimilated, but not have to give up our history, culture and identity as the going price???

wish Morales support and hopes he has a good security detail and top level dragon skin with kevlar....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never saw the "E" before...
Posted by: reidhaus on Oct 3, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Avo Morales is spelled with an "A", not an "E"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Its called Spanish pronunciation Posted by: brasilaron
What is boils down to is this;
Posted by: eosrk on Oct 3, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Morales just "ain't taking no shit from anyone, espically the Establishment"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Que Viva Presidente Morales!!!!!!
Posted by: StPeteRican on Oct 3, 2007 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May God Protect him from the CIA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My hopes are high
Posted by: profmarcus on Oct 3, 2007 8:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As one who lives part time in Argentina, has a warm spot in my heart for all of Latin America and particularly for native peoples, and knows first-hand the poverty and exploitation Bolivia has endured, I have nothing but admiration and good will for Evo Morales and wish him and his country only the best.

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indigenous times
Posted by: peacelf on Oct 3, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Lovato, for the compelling interview.

As I watched Evo Morales on The Daily Show, I thought "this guy IS different." He demanded such respect, that even Jon Stewart looked sheepish making jokes.

But, there was something historical in Morales' demeanor, something lost in the past 100 years and refound in the 21st century. It appears a Marxist revolution on its surface, but is less political and more humanistic than Marxism. It's the nearly lost indigenous culture. Whites spent much time and energy trying to destroy it.

However, the only thing whites have to fear about the indigenousization of Bolivia and other South American countries is the redistribution of wealth. Well, I guess that's everything rich whites fear. But, for whites to call it "racism" is...well, funny! Whites are well-served in the world: do not fear.

Case in point, Venezuela's Hugo Chavez nationalized one oil company to harness its profits for redistribution, and the Bush administration set to demonize and overthrow Chavez in a failed coup. That damned Monroe Doctrine at work.

The income from the nationalized oil assets was used to buy bricks for peasants' homes and further literacy and education among poor metizos and indigenous Venezuelans. I'm sure Marales is doing the same, because he and Chavez know, the only way to protect that formerly marginalized majority of the population is to educate them.

Moreover, any white who is against education is only wishing to return power back into the hands of the white minority. How's it feel?

Whites in Bolivia are fortunate enough to have a Morales, just as white South Africans were lucky to have the caring, compassionate and forgiving Nelson Mandella.

Ah, if we could only inject a little Evo into america.

peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I don't know... Posted by: peacelf
I don't fear him.
Posted by: drblack on Oct 3, 2007 10:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Evo ...certainly a much better human then Chavez, or bush. one of the best leader in the world. i still don't get the deal with amadinejhad

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Winds of Change
Posted by: Basenjis on Oct 3, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't understand enough of the complex political history of S. America to post a comment on the changes taking place. However, if what I have been reading about Evo Morales the man is any indication of the thinking behind any changes he may be instituting, I feel very hopeful indeed. Our South American neighbors are making some very interesting history.

A letter Morales wrote recently titled "Let's Respect Mother Earth" reads like the words of a poet or nature mystic, rather that those of a crass politician. This is a brilliant, heart-felt and profound plea for a just and equal sharing of our small planet's limited bounties. Morales speaks of all of us as "guests of Mother Earth," and his plea for fairness includes the animals who also have their rights.

This man's wisdom, eloquence and insights puts the rest of us to shame. Would that the US, most guilty of squandering so much more than its share and of defiling the atmosphere, rivers and land with our toxins, had such leadership at the head of our own misguided government.

Morales's letter on the environment can be found on the Countercurrents website, dated September 26, 2007.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only wealthy predators
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 3, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
have any reason to fear Evo Morales and the native people of Bolivia. There is no racial issue, except that instigated by flunky agents of those rich corporations who are losing their strangle hold on Bolivia's natural resources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only wealthy predators Posted by: rhinojos
» RE: Only wealthy predators Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE: Only wealthy predators Posted by: HSencillo
» RE: Only wealthy predators Posted by: HSencillo
» RE: Only wealthy predators Posted by: HSencillo
Bolivians still exploited in South America . . .
Posted by: MAD on Oct 3, 2007 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm rather concerned about the way indigenous Bolivians are still treated within their own country, let alone in bordering countries like Brazil, Argentina and Chile.

While life for the average Bolivian is improving ever so slightly, I can attest to the tenuous status of 95% of Bolivians. Having traveled the country not all that long ago, I was amazed at the lack of development, and not the McDonald's/Microsoft variety but rather the clean water, sanitation and safe transportation variety.

Not since I was in Africa had I seen such small, dilapidated mud huts, the majority of which had nearly crumbled to the ground. The residents of the Altiplano appeared to be the in the most precarious state as it is a land of perpetual drought, not that far removed from the Atacama desert in Chile - the driest place on earth. There is little agriculture due to the high altitude and short growing season.

That part which comprises the Amazon and even extending as far south as La Paz is equally distressed as their primary industry, apart from natural gas and tin mining, is coca production. The vast majority of the coca is produced for unprocessed consumption as tea or chew. It's really quite delicious and comes with amazing health benefits. Of course, that's simply unacceptable to Americans. We can't be importing something that might be beneficial to the puritanical dipshits who dot this sorry fucking land. And the "they'll make coke out of it" argument is simply nonsense. It takes such vast quantities of the hoja de coca or coca leaf to process cocaine that this kind of arguments simply would not hold up under scrutiny. Anyway, I digress.

Having recently returned to the US after a 2.5 year stay in Argentina (and Brazil to a lesser extent), I am unhappy to inform you that many Bolivians are literally locked in sweatshops in Buenos Aires (as well as in parts of Brazil and Chile) where they are exploited in much the same way 12-year-old Chinese girls are exploited. Far from being concerned about racism like the kind expressed by el hombre, I am still concerned about the exploitation of Bolivians by European Latin Americans.

As if that weren't enough, the Brazilian government began stirring up tension with Bolivia(ns) when Evo began to demand a fair price for the natural gas upon which 2/3 of Brazil is dependent. The Chilean government has also been known to fire a shot across their bow from time to time and Argentina treats its own Quechua people poorly so just imagine how Bolivians are treated.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Pot calling the kettle black
Posted by: FedUp on Oct 3, 2007 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Why are you going to go listen to that idiot? That racist indio (Indian) can't even talk during interviews," snarled my blonde-haired, green eyed Cuban friend when I told him I'd be covering the visit of Bolivian President Evo Morales."

I've listened to Evo Morales a number of times; his Spanish is very good. Considering the poor quality, mouth full-of-marbles mumble that passes for the Spanish spoken by the Cuban exile community, maybe the author's Cuban friend was making a sarcastic joke.

Having grown up surrounded by Cuban exiles; their contempt for indigenous people is only exceeded by their contempt for blacks.
''Indios con co'bata" (Indians with neckties) is a famous pejorative that they use to describe Anglo-Americans whom they deem low-class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Pot calling the kettle black Posted by: newtype_alpha
Latin America is throwing off its Chains ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 3, 2007 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The SA Elite is terrified . No longer will they be able to command 80% of the economy with 10% of the population.

They will no longer be able to sell their countries natural resources for peanuts to the America and Europe.

Corporations will no longer get usurious deals for resources and infrastructure

Bad news for the American Empire.

Read John Perkins Books ...
"Confessions of an Economic Hitman"
"The Secret History of the United States"
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People fear Morales?
Posted by: frankly1 on Oct 3, 2007 2:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only ones with any reason to fear Morales would be the tiny group of " people" that currently posess and control the vast majority of the wealth and resources of our planet and the class that feeds on the scraps from thier table. Morales represents the possibility of the only power able to rivial the corpoate superpower state. People Power! When people become educated enough to understand the system that they support by thier paticipation and then become aware of how the few exploit the many using numerous devices of violence, deception and corruption the potential exists for the people to come together to effect real change using the very democratic machinery that is currently used against the majority. Morales shows us the existence of a reasoned, compationate alternative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War on Democracy
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 3, 2007 5:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw John Pilger's new doco movie last night, "the war on democracy".

I'm sorry, but in the past 60 years or so, consecutive American governments have been and ARE the biggest criminals in the world.

Thieves, criminals, hypocrites, liars, torturers and murderers rule your country and if Osama bin Laden has managed to do ONE good thing, it's that he's helped wrench the attention of the US _away_ from Latin America and they are now getting all those socialist-type governments they always wanted or now need because their people and their resources have been so badly treated and depleted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you have not seen him speak you are missing out.
Posted by: Missing Piece on Oct 3, 2007 5:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had never heard of this man until I saw him on the, "Daily Show". I was amazed out how centered and calm this man was, even though he was fighting for basic things. I hope he is able to stay pure and show us how to fight corporate theft.

We will be next, and I would imagine they will have blacks fighting whites and all sorts of things to maintain chaos until they get the power they want. Iraq is a good example of what they are capable of, not to mention the Shock Doctrine that has shown how they herd us like sheep whenever they want.

Good luck, build an earth home and go off grid

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]