Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

Eyes on Trade: On the Campaign Trail

By Holly Shulman, Eyes on Trade. Posted September 17, 2007.


In the first installment of a new weekly series, Public Citizen looks at how trade issues are playing out on the road to the White House.
Advertisement

I'd like to introduce a new series called Trade on the Trail, each Friday bringing you what candidates have said on the campaign trail about trade that week.

Former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) released a statement on NAFTA trucks:

The Bush administration has allowed multinational corporations and their Washington lobbyists to jeopardize American highways and streets. They are putting profits over safety and pushing through this program without regard for the impact on the environment or the safety of America's workers and families. As president, I will enact smart trade policies that put workers, wages and families first.
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY), according to the Washington Post, "told students in New Hampshire this week that she hated 'seeing U.S. telemarketing jobs done in remote locations far, far from our shores.'"

Also, a Clinton spokesperson said to the The Sun News (Myrtle Beach, SC):

The senator wants NAFTA and other trade deals "consistently monitored and evaluated."

She wants to make sure that our trade deals expand, not reduce, the number of good-paying, middle-class jobs and raise, not lower, American wages.

And Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM), also reported in The Sun News:

"Look, I voted for it [NAFTA]," Richardson said in an interview after his speech to the union leaders in McCormick. "I'm not apologizing for it. We thought the standards on environmental protection, on worker's protection would be strong. They were weak."

And in the polls:

Politico comments on a Quinnipiac poll which tested how the candidates would do in Ohio. Apparently, they were surprised by the no more NAFTA fervent that was the same in all tested demographics (maybe they forgot to read our Election Report?),

Along with Michigan, Ohio has been the state perhaps hardest hit by job losses due to foreign competition. Although Republicans are slightly more supportive of free trade than are Democrats or independents, even within GOP ranks there is clear resentment that Ohio's prosperity is being sacrificed to foreign competitors.

For instance, when Ohio voters are asked whether they think the U.S. economy would be better off if the nation continues its current trade laws or increases restrictions on imported goods, by a 60 percent to 30 percent margin they pick the latter. Even Republicans want new restrictions on imports, by a 55 percent to 35 percent margin…

…Only 21 percent believe the growth of the global economy has helped the Ohio economy, 30 percent think it has helped their families' bottom line, and 30 percent say it has helped the U.S. economy.

And that's it for this week's Trade on the Trail.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: trade, campaign08

Holly Shulman is the press officer at Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Trade and World Unemployment.
Posted by: yellow on Sep 18, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to a recent ILO report the Free Trade chickens are finally coming home to roost. The International Labour Organization of the UN has determined that as of the first quarter of 2007, global unemployment exceeds 195 million people or close to 7% of the world's labor force. The ILO cites labor saving technology in industry as well as the general global economic slowdown but trade agreements ranked highest on the list of culprits.

Agreements like NAFTA represent a net loss of jobs because of agricultural commodity dumping which destroys the viability of local farms, the shipping of jobs to low wage areas where new labor saving technologies are used and the displacement of local business with foreign imports. Sherrod Brown has pointed out that the growth of redundant trade (one country importing and exporting high volumes of the same commodities simultaniously) in agricultural commodities resulted in both record bankruptcies in the Florida citrus sector and higher fruit prices of imports for US consumers at the same time!!

There seems to be no traditional laws of economics at work any longer. There is just transnational corporate control of the global economy. Trade is more about foreign direct investment and the concentration of market share and productive assets globally. The growing number of working poor around the world shows the system is not working.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What's with the no apology b.s.?!
Posted by: DaBear on Sep 18, 2007 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And Gov. Bill Richardson (D-NM), also reported in The Sun News: "Look, I voted for it [NAFTA]," Richardson said in an interview after his speech to the union leaders in McCormick. "I'm not apologizing for it. We thought the standards on environmental protection, on worker's protection would be strong. They were weak."

Well, gee Bill, I'm not apologizing for calling you a braindead turd because 13% of the U.S. population knew what you didn't when we told ya' not to vote for NAFTA. I am so sick of politicians—Hillary, Bill, and all you corporate rich white jerkweeds—not apologizing for torpedoing our lives (Iraq, NAFTA, subprimes, etc.). You OWE us not only an apology but reparations. If you can't find it in the form of bringing home troops now and ending or revamping NAFTA now, then you OWE us from your own pocket! Every last damned dime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]