Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

ForeignPolicy

The World's Sole Superpower in Fast Decline

By Dilip Hiro, Tomdispatch.com. Posted August 23, 2007.


In almost every measure, the United States is past its zenith. A look at the challenges that are bringing the heyday to a halt.
Advertisement

With the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the United States stood tall -- militarily invincible, economically unrivalled, diplomatically uncontestable, and the dominating force on information channels worldwide. The next century was to be the true "American century," with the rest of the world molding itself in the image of the sole superpower.

Yet, with not even a decade of this century behind us, we are already witnessing the rise of a multipolar world in which new powers are challenging different aspects of American supremacy -- Russia and China in the forefront, with regional powers Venezuela and Iran forming the second rank. These emergent powers are primed to erode American hegemony, not confront it, singly or jointly.

How and why has the world evolved in this way so soon? The Bush administration's debacle in Iraq is certainly a major factor in this transformation, a classic example of an imperialist power, brimming with hubris, over-extending itself. To the relief of many -- in the U. S. and elsewhere -- the Iraq fiasco has demonstrated the striking limitations of power for the globe's highest-tech, most destructive military machine. In Iraq, Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to two U.S. presidents, concedes in a recent op-ed, "We are being wrestled to a draw by opponents who are not even an organized state adversary."

The invasion and subsequent disastrous occupation of Iraq and the mismanaged military campaign in Afghanistan have crippled the credibility of the United States. The scandals at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and Guantanamo in Cuba, along with the widely publicized murders of Iraqi civilians in Haditha, have badly tarnished America's moral self-image. In the latest opinion poll, even in a secular state and member of NATO like Turkey, only 9 percent of Turks have a "favorable view" of the U.S. (down from 52 percent just five years ago).

Yet there are other explanations -- unrelated to Washington's glaring misadventures -- for the current transformation in international affairs. These include, above all, the tightening market in oil and natural gas, which has enhanced the power of hydrocarbon-rich nations as never before; the rapid economic expansion of the mega-nations China and India; the transformation of China into the globe's leading manufacturing base; and the end of the Anglo-American duopoly in international television news.

Many Channels, Diverse Perceptions

During the 1991 Gulf War, only CNN and the BBC had correspondents in Baghdad. So the international TV audience, irrespective of its location, saw the conflict through their lenses. Twelve years later, when the Bush administration, backed by British Prime Minister Tony Blair, invaded Iraq, Al Jazeera Arabic broke this duopoly. It relayed images -- and facts -- that contradicted the Pentagon's presentation. For the first time in history, the world witnessed two versions of an ongoing war in real time. So credible was the Al Jazeera Arabic version that many television companies outside the Arabic-speaking world -- in Europe, Asia and Latin America -- showed its clips.

Though, in theory, the growth of cable television worldwide raised the prospect of ending the Anglo-American duopoly in 24-hour TV news, not much had happened due to the exorbitant cost of gathering and editing TV news. It was only the arrival of Al Jazeera English, funded by the hydrocarbon-rich emirate of Qatar -- with its declared policy of offering a global perspective from an Arab and Muslim angle -- that, in 2006, finally broke the long-established mold.

Soon France 24 came on the air, broadcasting in English and French from a French viewpoint, followed in mid-2007 by the English-language Press TV, which aimed to provide an Iranian perspective. Russia was next in line for 24-hour TV news in English for the global audience. Meanwhile, spurred by Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, Telesur, a pan-Latin-American TV channel based in Caracas, began competing with CNN in Spanish for a mass audience.

As with Qatar, so with Russia and Venezuela, the funding for these TV news ventures has come from soaring national hydrocarbon incomes -- a factor draining American hegemony not just in imagery but in reality.

Russia, an Energy Superpower

Under President Vladimir Putin, Russia has more than recovered from the economic chaos that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. After effectively renationalizing the energy industry through state-controlled corporations, he began deploying its economic clout to further Russia's foreign policy interests.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: mexico, iran, venezuela, china, russia, superpower, american hegemony

Dilip Hiro is the author of Secrets and Lies: Operation "Iraqi Freedom" and, most recently, Blood of the Earth: The Battle for the World's Vanishing Oil Resources, both published by Nation Books.



Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
For more on our hydrocarbon-related mess, please see these interviews
Posted by: zyxwvut on Aug 23, 2007 12:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
with Matthew Simmons. "All the Canaries Have Stopped Singing," from August 18, is the most up-to-date regarding the United States' energy predicament.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You sure do like to rub our nose in it, don't you.
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 23, 2007 1:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Multi-polar you say? Only a jingoist sees that as a threat. Or someone who needs an excuse to kick a man when he's down.

What this article seems to suggest is that the US cannot build alliances when it wants to. Hogwash. We went into Iraq thinking we did not need to build alliances. That does not mean that we could not have then and cannot in the future. We made a terrible mistake, and the fact that Bush has not learned a lesson does not mean that the US has not learned a lesson.

The notion that the US could dominate the globe, with impunity, is a hollywood fantasy fed by our own homegrown strain of fascist sympathies. The fact that the media can stir up a war comes as no surprise. It sells, since the media mantra remains "If it bleeds, it leads.” Nothing bleeds more than world war. Every reporter wants to be Eric Sevareide during the London Blitz. (Or to write an article prophesying gloom and doom, like this one.)

It's a threat if our competition comes from dictators who get their power by military might and eventually cannot hold on to power without provoking their nation to enter a war. Except for that, it is in the US interest that all nations improve their economic conditions. Can we handle the competition? Gimme a break. Does a bear...you know?

So long as those who lead our nation do not want anything to change, then we will of course be driven to desperation. Yeah. Bush’s *lone ranger* strategy is history. As with the school yard bully, all he needs is some new friends to enjoy life with rather than fighting for attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I'm not so sure you're right Posted by: HeroesAll
Unfortunately, the US has proven itself incapable of being the ringbearer.
Posted by: Pat Kittle on Aug 23, 2007 2:02 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Ring of Endless Growth corrupts all who behold it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Finally! Glad to see other nations stand up for themselves
Posted by: MindyB on Aug 23, 2007 2:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading this article was like a breath of fresh air! It is about time other nations stood up to the US and increased their economic, diplomatic and military power.
As history has taught all of them, unless you protect yourself and arm yourself to the gills, the US will invade and occupy under false pretenses, destroy your country and steal all your valuable resources--in the name of "freedom and democracy"
It's about time the mask the US dones is ripped off and the true ugliness of the US is exposed to all.
More power to those nations who have spoken against US imperialism and bullying, and that are acting against the US arrogance and sense of entitlement by enriching their coffers, gaining partners and miliatry strength.
However, seeing how we are so arrogant and blind, the US will not see what is trully happening and will continue to try to pillage the world of its resources, until it is stopped in its tracks by an even more powerful force.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dont worry!
Posted by: TT5 on Aug 23, 2007 3:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you guys get tired, Chinas ready to take over;=))

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dont worry! Posted by: tap17x
» RE: Dont worry! Posted by: MAD
Next
Posted by: ssegallmd on Aug 23, 2007 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Liao Xilong, commander of the People's Liberation Army's general logistics department, said: "The present day world is no longer peaceful and to protect national security, stability and territorial integrity we must suitably increase spending on military modernization.""

Nice work, Mr. Decider. Congratulations to everybody who voted Republican - twice. LOL.

America is obviously incompetent as a superpower. We've abused that power consistently, entering into the age-old nation-killer of empire, right off the bat - late nineteenth / early twentieth century - and making all of the mistakes possible, several many times (Vietnamiraq), steadfastly refusing to learn from the history of our own cultural ancestors such as ancient Rome and modern England (twice!).

Like a sprinter in a race against nobody else, Uncle Sam falls down while racing on the track all alone. LOL. Or, like a ghetto kid becoming rich overnight in music or sports, and flaming out into self-extinction from the git.

Next.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Two further reasons for the United States' Decline
Posted by: US Citizen on Aug 23, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two additional reasons for the United States' precipitous decline are the crumbling of its infrastructure due to decades of "No New Taxes" neglect and the widespread corruption of business exemplified by the subprime debacle, Halliburton and Blackwater, and the billions money-grab from hurricane Katrina.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Patriotism and Criticism
Posted by: american on Aug 23, 2007 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Criticism of one's country is in keeping with patriotism. It is an impelling mechanism for the continuation of the country's principles. The constitution explicitly puts forth this principle in both the individual rights granted by it but also in the countervailing, balancing arrangement of the government. And the Declaration is, if anything, sanctioning criticism and action. Indeed, they both do. The goal: liberty, justice, fairness, and freedom. (When you have lost your way, go back to where you started.) This country has been hijacked by those with entirely self-serving intentions.

Have at it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Patriotism and Criticism Posted by: makeadifference
» WTF are you talking about? Posted by: american
Good
Posted by: owleyes on Aug 23, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I never liked the "superpower" model. It's not healthy. There's no good reason why the rest of the world should have to put up with some annoying global hegemon that constantly has to prove its superiority by imposing itself everywhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What goes around comes around
Posted by: xbj on Aug 23, 2007 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the 90's we had a President that treated the world as a friend and an ally; terrorism was on the decrease since the first WTC attack, the US's approval rating among the Muslim world was the highest it had ever been and would ever be after going into the Balkans to end the genocide of Muslims in Kosovo, and the good will and shining light that the US put out (with the CIA unable to run illegal wars under Clinton's nose) came back at the US tenfold.

Truly, we were looking at a twenty-first century of tolerance and peace and light.

Much to the dismay of the warmongers and war profiteering Nazis, especially the descendants of Prescott Bush and their cronies.

And so, God gave America exactly what it deserved after a year of lynching a good man for a blowjob; Bush and Cheney, an antiChirstian Luciferian Christianist moron puppet and an atheist war profiteering Rasputin, who conned the military and rogue branch of the CIA to attack its own country and people on 9-11. To save it from the emerging threat of militant islam THEY THEMSELVES HAD CREATED OUT OF THIN AIR and Zionist paranoia and propoganda.

What goes around comes around, and Amerika? Your days are truly numbered. In the TRIPLE DIGITS. If you're LUCKY.

If Bush and Cheney even try to nuke Iran, make that DUAL DIGITS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» xbj - Please dig a little deeper Posted by: LeftWright
Decline? Or is it a chance to expand?
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 23, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The decline started when we had trouble deciding how much human there was in people of color. It started when we gave corperations more rights than citizens.It started as soon as we decided to pattern ourselves after another failed civilization....Rome.
Aggressor Nations don't last long. We've been at it for only a short 60 years or so. We're still the new kids on the block.
Do we really want to be this way? From the folks I've talked to,I'd say ,NO!!
People are sick of rulership by fear. Governance that does nothing but take you money and when hard times comes...they take a vacation. Sick of a government that sends their kids off to die for some secret corporate agenda.
No I think we are at a crossroads. A crossroad that can lead to a better life for everyone. I think we can have a better government,we just have to Think Outside the System
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez
www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

25ghostcommander
Posted by: 25ghostcommander on Aug 23, 2007 10:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, who do we have to thank for this decline? We can thank the Bush mis-administration, the Gop, the RNC, and all of it's lockstep, rubber stamping brown shirt minions. Yes, we have met the enemy and it is the American Fascist's-the Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lack of Leadership
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 23, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is too bad we don't have any moral leaders who can inspire the U.S public to become as energy efficient/oil independent as they can. Likewise, it is too bad most people don't have to will to make the changes since they have been so brainwashed by the media to just by the right product or shrink a few dress sizes and all will be well. We need another American revolution where we do the right thing IN SPITE of our politicians.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» somehow I think Posted by: owleyes
» RE: somehow I think Posted by: MindyB
What would have happened in Afghanistan if........
Posted by: tap17x on Aug 23, 2007 11:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
............a sensible US president, a LIBERAL one, had gone into Afghanistan first to remove the Taliban and second to turn that country around by using most of the resources Bushit has shamefully wasted in Iraq? We might have made Afghanistan a model near-east country compared to its former self. We could have built schools to counteract the madrassas, built bridges, water systems, hospitals, etc. The Afghans might even have thanked us profusely for freeing them and restoring them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US has a two-party system, but........
Posted by: tap17x on Aug 23, 2007 11:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..........the two parties are a conservative one and an extreme right-wing one. Both are hopelessly corrupt, beholden to whomever will give a few million to get them reelected. For what? To maintain the old corrupt system? But I will still vote Dem because they're less in the thrall of the worst influence of all, right-wing fascist Christianity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» almost makes you wish Posted by: owleyes
My 2 cents
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Aug 23, 2007 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd say that multi-national corporations and the various global shell games - currency, energy, etc. - have done far more to erode us than any enemy-of-the-month national rival. Wealth has no loyalty.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Time to Ditch the Federal Reserve
Posted by: edgar_michel on Aug 23, 2007 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Time to ditch the Federal Reserve

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

no superpower has dominated the world for more than a few centuries?
Posted by: Suzon on Aug 24, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author may have to rethink this statement in light of the fact that Elizabeth II, a direct descendant of 1066 invader and occupier of England, William the Conquerer, has a legal claim to one-sixth of the earth's land surface.

The first royal charter was granted by William the Conquerer in 1067 to the Corporation of the City of London, making it entirely self-regulating, i.e., above the law. This is still the reality.

Although the revolutionaries won the war which began in 1776, the Royal Society of St George whose mission it was to promote all things English had been established in New York City in 1770 and slightly later in Philadelphia and in Charleston. The society is active to this day. American royalists run the gamut from Alexander Hamilton to the Bush dynasty.

The Norman-English have kept themselves in an elite and advantageous position for nearly a thousand years and are still going strong. We just don't recognise it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Military-Industrial Complex
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 24, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Military-Industrial Complex sucks the life out of our economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US Decay
Posted by: Dianka on Aug 25, 2007 10:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America has decayed internally. Funding for human needs (aka, welfare) was eliminated (stolen), and the poor were essentially turned into a Third World workforce, providing much of the cheapest (and least legally-protected) labor in the US. Businesses sprouted up to "manage" workfare labor, a self-perpetuating system of citizen impoverishment (a number of those who are "laid off" from their jobs
become workfare labor, filling jobs--at a fraction of the wage--of other laid off workers). Meanwhile, we have seen a quarter-century of massive, annual "tax breaks" for corporations/richest 1%. Rather than spurring domestic job creation, this money has been used to increase the fortunes of the few while moving American jobs to Third World nations...thereby increasing the stockpile of super-cheap
American workfare labor. Billions of taxpayer dollars have gone to cover "tax breaks" for the rich rather than to cover the needs of the American people, from legitimate welfare aid, to maintaining the infrastructure, to education and health care. In short, a small group of the super-wealthy raided the national treasury, and the American people are stuck with the inevitable consequences.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

World Decay
Posted by: Ellie1 on Aug 26, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is being foisted by the organized religions that require all of its brainwashed masses to reproduce more than the world or their countries can support.

I don't care if it is the born again christians or the conservative jews or muslims. Every religion has its faction that requires reproduction as a religious duty, and the world suffers for it. But the leaders of these sects receive power and money-and that's what it is all about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US in decline since killing use to solve problems
Posted by: fearn on Aug 30, 2007 10:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and that policy has been in use for over 100 years. No country can achieve greatness or respect when it kills millions of innocent people to further its goals. The revulsion that billions feel for America seems to be a secret in the USA probably for the same reason that the bombings of and interventions in so many other countries are a secret in the USA. That is changing and will continue change in the decades to come. Download, for free, www.amoralamerica.info for more details.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]