Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

Gay Arabic Translator: "I'm Here, I'm Willing to Serve" [VIDEO]

By Adam Howard, AlterNet. Posted June 20, 2007.


Over 11,000 service members have been discharged from the military in the past 14 years because of their sexual orientation. It's time to lift the ban on openly gay people in the military.

Stephen Benjamin describes himself as a "recruiter's dream." He is a highly trained, award-winning Navy Arabic translator who is eager and "willing to serve," yet because of the outdated and discriminatory "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy of the U.S. military, he has been discharged and denied the opportunity to serve our country. Celebrated filmmaker Robert Greenwald and his Brave New Foundation, in collaboration with the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (SLDN), hope to set this injustice right with a new campaign being launched at LiftTheBan.org.

"The 'don't ask don't tell policy' is legalized discrimination," said Greenwald. "Stephen Benjamin is the subject of our film, but the problem is a huge disgrace."

Reports have shown that more than 11,000 service members have been discharged from the military in the past 14 years because of their sexual orientation. Benjamin was targeted for dismissal because of some personal instant messages he had sent to his roommate, who is also gay, which were intercepted and revealed their homosexuality. In a New York Times op-ed, Benjamin explained the predicament he was in:

I could have written a statement denying that I was homosexual, but lying did not seem like the right thing to do. My roommate made the same decision, though he was allowed to remain in Iraq until the scheduled end of his tour.

The result was the termination of our careers, and the loss to the military of two more Arabic translators. The 68 other -- heterosexual -- service members remained on active duty, despite many having committed violations far more egregious than ours; the Pentagon apparently doesn't consider hate speech, derogatory comments about women or sexual misconduct grounds for dismissal.

My supervisors did not want to lose me. Most of my peers knew I was gay, and that didn't bother them. I was always accepted as a member of the team. And my experience was not anomalous: polls of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan show an overwhelming majority are comfortable with gays. Many were aware of at least one gay person in their unit and had no problem with it.

"Don't ask, don't tell" does nothing but deprive the military of talent it needs and invade the privacy of gay service members just trying to do their jobs and live their lives. Political and military leaders who support the current law may believe that homosexual soldiers threaten unit cohesion and military readiness, but the real damage is caused by denying enlistment to patriotic Americans and wrenching qualified individuals out of effective military units. This does not serve the military or the nation well.

On the Lift the Ban site, and to your right, is a three-minute video that details Benjamin's story. The clip concludes with a call to sign an online petition in favor of overturning "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" and encourages viewers to support the passing of the Military Readiness Enhancement Act (HR 1246).

"This dynamic new project from the Brave New Foundation showcases the impact 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' continues to exact on our armed forces," said Steve Ralls, Director of Communications for SLDN. "With this new campaign, the public can speak out against the ban and join our coalition partners in building support for repeal. We are proud to be working alongside Brave New Foundation to build grassroots support for toppling 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'"

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: military, gay, discrimination

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from A Soldier Speaks! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
With the way things are going...
Posted by: ateo on Jun 20, 2007 12:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
are you really sure you want to remove one of the only ways out of the military or to avoid a draft? I hope you remember all of this when the draft starts up.

It sucks that with homosexuals being a more or less widely accepted part of American society they can't serve in the military. However, keep in mind that there are very few ways out of the military after you sign on that dotted line. No matter that the president sends you off to fight a war for oil (or whatever). No matter that the original reasons behind the war have been proven false. No matter that you're dying (and killing) for nothing more than greed fueled lies.

Canada won't take you. The U.S. threatened them via back room politics into stopping that game after 'nam.

Be careful what you wish for friends. Not everyone will be happy when/if women and gays are being drafted right along side the heterosexual males to be sent off to the meat grinder in Iran or Korea.

That said, I fully expect DADT to be repealed early in the next presidency. Of course this will be against the wishes of the top brass and another example of the military being micromanaged by Washington but it will happen. They got women on ships didn't they? They'll get gays in body bags as well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not allow gays to serve?
Posted by: RDVSR on Jun 20, 2007 7:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having been in the military during Korean War, I don't recall ever knowing that another soldier was "gay". In my life here and now, I know business people who are gay, and we interface in the same manner that I would with any person. I try to treat others fairly, and most of the time they (including gays) do the same.
If their sex orientation caused some problem, I would avoid that person, as I would anyone who caused a problem.

In other words, I think that Gays should be allowed to serve in the military unless/until an individual causes some problem because of it. Of course anyone who causes any kind of problem has to be dealt with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» its the idea man Posted by: schokoprinz
Amazingly Shortsighted
Posted by: JSquercia on Jun 20, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idea that we would be willing to accept the loss of a Desperately needed skill because the person possesing it is gay is betond STUPID it is SUICIDAL .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Of course gays should serve in the military.
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 20, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1965, when I was a KC135 pilot in the Strategic Air Command, two gay navigators in my squadron lived together off base. No one in the tanker unit, including our C.O., cared about their sexual orientation, which was common knowledge -- only how well they performed in the air.

Their homosexuality was accepted without qualms for two reasons. First, neither guy ever mentioned being gay. Second, and most importantly, they were two of the squadron's best "gators."

My relationship with them as a fellow tanker crewmember and good friend convinced me that people who oppose in gays in the military are both homophobic and stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What I wanna know?
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 20, 2007 9:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if these service personnel are so highly trained... why hasn't DOD Canada made them a fabulous offer? How hard can it be to offer proper healthcare, the career they desire... & the LEGAL ENTITLEMENT to MARRIAGE?

I mean... few Americans realize that Canadian & British forces serving in Afghanistan desperately require NATO assistance...

If we hear ONE MORE Air America on-air talent say, "we're going it alone" & slurring NATO... Canadians are gonna have some sort of spastic freak-out...

Spread Love...
... but wear the Glove!


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
"We, two, form a multitude" ~ Ovid
==
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What I wanna know? Posted by: babs
Some Random Thoughts....
Posted by: CatDad on Jun 20, 2007 12:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A President "Hillary" would bring with her painful memories of Bill's "Don't Ask/Don't Tell" debacle...Of course she'd campaign to repeal it...then if elected...it would immediately go (indefinitely) on the back burner (like all other progressive issues).

"Slick" Mitt, like all other Republicans, realize that they MUST play the "gay card" to win any national election...so of course they wouldn't repeal it regardless of their (Mitt and Rudy's) past pro-gay policies.

I saw an episode of Kathy Griffin's "My Life on the D List" on BravoTV last year where she had gone to Iraq to entertain the troops...Her impression was that the military would be a scary and dangerous place for overtly gay men....Kathy has impeccable pro-gay credentials, so this opinion has to carry some weight.

Lastly, the military as it exists, circa 2007, is a frightening place for both gays AND straights. The US military is no longer a benevolent force of the world's preeminent democracy but rather a brutal occupying force that is increasingly hated by all nations. Right now I'd advise all young people to stay out of the service (and reserves) as it currently exists.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ever Try to Learn Arabic?
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Jun 20, 2007 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Man, is it hard. Check out this from "I'm Trying to Learn Arabic" by Robert Lane Greene writing for Slate:

". . . in Arabic, as in Hebrew, people don't include most vowels when writing. Maktab, or "office," is just written mktb. Vowels are included as little marks above and below in beginning textbooks, but you soon have to get used to doing without them. Whn y knw th lngg wll ths s nt tht hrd. But when you're struggling with comprehension to begin with, it's pretty formidable."

Maybe not a problem for the text messaging generation, but still. . . Meanwhile, any American who succeeds in mastering Arabic should not only be put to work immediately, but be handsomely rewarded. Those who hold their sexual orientation against them are guilty of sabotaging national security.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» in our dreams! Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
There's maybe a bigger question...
Posted by: vangogh69 on Jun 20, 2007 1:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About the military that needs to be asked in 2007, mainly what its role is/should be. Men and women should be allowed to enter the military-industrial complex, if they so wish, but let's not do it ignorantly. Perhaps as a gay man, I should have more sympathy for others trying to get in/stay in; however, seeing as how our military is occupying another country with no signs of leaving, we need to be more progressive and challange the role of our military when authoratative elements have infiltrated Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For every 1 homosexual that wants to serve there are 500 that don't
Posted by: ateo on Jun 20, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe 5,000.

When DADT is repealed it's gone for good. If the draft is brought back all this means is the DoD has more fresh meat to throw to the grinder in Iran, Korea, China - wherever.

How many young people will be forced to fight, kill and die after this is repealed?

How about first we stop invading countries and starting wars where we kill hundreds of thousands of people and lose thousands of American soldiers?

Who wants to be a part of the U.S. military today? Sadists? Psychopaths? People that just want to kill people?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Posted by: CatDad
» Are you nutz?? Posted by: gellero
THIS WAR IS DESIGNED TO FAIL
Posted by: thetruth07 on Jun 20, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe it's just me...but the decisions that have been made during the war is just beyond belief!
First, we have a Command in Chief that ignores the best info from his own military, we don't have proper equipment protecting our soldiers as in "you go into war with what you have" Donald Rumsfeld, Halliburton reaps the cash by serving our soldiers bad water and leaky tents.
Now, you get rid of people because of their sexual orientation? Give me a break!! We need people who understand the language, that's very important in any war.
The military is not winning this war, the contractors and corporations are!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DON'T YOU ALL GET IT??
Posted by: gellero on Jun 20, 2007 8:25 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gays can serve....they just have to be descrete. Most enlisted men are working class or rural teenagers with a cultural anti-gay bias. They are not college intellectuals. In a testosterone fueled cohort, open homosexuality is disruptive....I'm not judging.....that's just the way it is. The military is NOT the place to be 'socially progressive'. Get over it........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DON'T YOU ALL GET IT?? Posted by: CatDad
Yo, CAT
Posted by: gellero on Jun 21, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't you read??? The official policy is 'don't ask, don't tell'. A reasonable compromise. There is NO BAN on homosexuality per se.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yo, CAT Posted by: CatDad