COMMENTS: 123
What's So Wrong With Wearing Heels and Makeup?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest A Soldier Speaks headlines via email.
But I couldn't. For some reason, I had to admit, when I put on that unflattering uniform and forfeited my feminine fashion, I became more competent as a Naval officer. Still, the worst part of all this is that even though we give up our femininity as soon as we lace up those wretched combat boots, we still haven't achieved equality -- in the military or the civilian world. (Especially since women still aren't allowed in special operations units, including the Navy SEALs.)
Consider: A friend of mine is a Marine Corps officer. She was a cross-country runner during college and a math major to boot. She's the epitome of a strong, capable woman and what the Marine Corps looks for in its officers. But they are going to be losing her as soon as she can get out. "I just want a job where I can wear makeup and high heels everyday!" she told me. Not exactly a scene from "G.I. Jane," is it?
However, it is a symptom of what's wrong with attitudes toward what is feminine. What's so wrong with high heels and makeup? Putting yourself together attractively is an exhibition of your self-respect and confidence. When she expresses her desire to do just that, she's scoffed at. And yet she can do the job just as capably as her counterparts who don't don threads that look like something out of InStyle.
Honestly, I wouldn't complain about this if women were treated somewhat equally, even with their sacrifices. I know it's bound to be harder to be a woman in male-dominated areas like the military. However, the suppression of feminine qualities isn't getting us equal treatment either. I have another friend, for instance, who is in pilot's training and is forced to work harder, longer, and better than the boys. Male pilots even say to her, "it's only because you're a girl," when they all check the schedule and see her name appear twice as often as theirs (to push her at a pace where she she'll be more likely to fail). I know she's strong enough to handle the torment, but it still infuriates me.
A recent New York Times Magazine article, "The Women's War," reported the much higher incidence of sexual assault of females in the military and exposure to trauma. Despite the fact that women now make up 15 percent of the ranks worldwide, the deep-seeded problems in these organizations have changed little. Embracing our penchant for Charles David wedges isn't going to change such disturbing systemic problems, of course -- but the failure of even female military types to accept girlier qualities does say something about why it's so difficult to change the testosterone-fueled culture.
I didn't want to believe that these problems still existed in the military. Those of us who serve want to become a part of an organization that is supposed to be greater and better than we ever could be as individuals, and in some ways it still fulfills that role. But the military is falling disgustingly short in gender equality. We can't change being females, nor can even the butchest girl hide that she is a woman. Gender is an issue. Ignoring it is stupid, and the attitude of "we are all the same" has reached its pinnacle. It still hasn't penetrated all of the prejudices.
So I like a little blush on my cheeks and a little heel in my soles. Those are personal choices that don't make me incompetent. Now that I'm out of the military, my fits of fashion are even more sacred. I relish getting up in the morning for work and being able to decide between my Chloe boots or my Marc Jacob pumps. I don't dress inappropriately or in any way unprofessionally, but I dress like a woman, an attractive one. Why does that still translate to me being silly?
In uniform with my hair in a bun, pants up to my neck and a collar choking me, I felt imprisoned. I could be strong, but not attractive (why can't we be both?). I would never be viewed as normal like my sorority sister walking down the hall in civilian clothes next to me. I knew it was a condition of my service, and my solution isn't changing the military uniform (though it could seriously use an update). We should instead amend how we view femininity. In everyday life women are pressured to keep up with the celebrity Joneses who flaunt their womanly wiles in often-gratuitous ways. But a woman in the military can expect a more difficult experience if she so much coats her toenails with polish.
So the next time you see a girl walking down the street in Rock & Republic jeans and Miu Miu wedges, don't judge her so quickly as a frivolous girl who just spends hours poring over magazines. She may be that girl, but she may also have spent an equal amount of time convoying across the desert in a flak jacket with an M-16, all the more grateful for her chance to show off her curves and her pedicure because of it.
Stay up to date with the latest A Soldier Speaks headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: talkville on Jun 18, 2007 1:12 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JDBishop5 on Jun 18, 2007 3:27 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The above quoted passage says it all for me. As a father of five girls who are strong independent people, I can’t imagine myself surviving asking the same question of them. They are beautiful, intelligent, graduates of excellent universities and I’m sure they would want to know why a woman had to submit to “high heels and makeup” to be feminine. Who in hell made that rule?
Stand and look at the women’s section of any magazine rack and you will be convinced of something that marketers believe to be true, and they make more money than I do. They think American women are idiots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: JDBishop5
Posted by: g
» RE: JDBishop5
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» Not a bad point
Posted by: kepstein7777
Comments are closed-
Posted by: White middleclass male on Jun 18, 2007 3:44 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Next I want to see equal PT (physical training) standards. In the Army, males and females are graded on 2 separate scales. Some people argue that because females are not in the combat arms branches, they do not need to have the same level of physical fitness as the men. I agree that an Infantry Ranger needs to be tougher than a Med Corp nurse. If the army wanted PT standards based on the job you do, fine. But since women do less, I consider them less.
My third issue is with women being able to leave the army or combat if they get pregnant. I know the army does not let them leave to “support families”, but because a mother in the military is more of a liability than an asset. There are a number of cases where a female soldier got knocked up in Iraq, got sent home and then aborted the fetus. I'd love to get sent back to the states and get to abort an unwanted kid. It would be like Christmas, My birthday and a blow job all rolled up into one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» QUESTION: What does a shaved head have to do with bravery and intellignce? ANSWER: Nothing!
Posted by: HughScott
» Q: What does conforming to the same standards have to do with being equal? A: Everything.
Posted by: White middleclass male
» Were you actually ever in the military, WMM?
Posted by: mjabele
» Meh, I ran laps around the women in the Air Force, literally
Posted by: ateo
» The sexist male belief that men are "physically stronger"...
Posted by: Amynda M.
» Uh, right
Posted by: ateo
» RE: Uh, right
Posted by: Arianna
» RE: Meh, I ran laps around the women in the Air Force, literally
Posted by: Libertine
» RE: Q: What does conforming to the same standards have to do with being equal? A: Everything.
Posted by: H_H
» Shaving heads is about hazing and health reasons.
Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Comments are closed-
Posted by: astockton on Jun 18, 2007 3:47 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Men's faces good enough as is?
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» Men's faces good enough as is? YES!
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Men's faces good enough as is? YES!
Posted by: MAD
» RE: Men's faces good enough as is? YES!
Posted by: frosty86
» and yes, many women MUST wear makeup...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: and yes, many women MUST wear makeup...
Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: and yes, many women MUST wear makeup...
Posted by: frosty86
» Continental Airlines case
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 18, 2007 3:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being single at the time and a second looie, too, I also dated one of the ladies. I had no problem separating her military role from her feminine one. As far as I was concerned, the sexier she was off duty, the better. I don’t know what a “Club Monaco pencil skirt” is, but if it makes an off-duty military women more attractive, that’s great!
Another thing I learned as a young man: never judge books by their covers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: emgscot51 on Jun 18, 2007 3:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: frosty86 on Jun 18, 2007 4:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wearing high heels has been shown to be unhealthy for one's back and one's knees. It forces the back into an uncomfortable and unhealthy position. But beyond that, women are taught early on that they're supposed to wear makeup and heels. The pressure to do so is enormous and we get it everywhere. The message is that they're never fine the way they are and the way they look matters more than anything else. The message is: You better be tall and skinny so put on a pair of heels. And your face is imperfect so you'd better cover it up so you can conform to some standard of beauty.
I've heard some women say they like wearing makeup and heels because it makes them feel empowered but I will argue that this is a false sense of power. She may get compliments on how she looks and men may look at her but the makeup and heels won't stop her from job discrimination. It won't stop men from sexually assaulting her and it won't ensure that she has reproductive rights. What it will do is reinforce that women should cover their faces which are always imperfect and that they should wear uncomfortable, unhealthy shoes just to look 'sexy' (the male gaze). When women's feet in China bound their feet, we called this 'patriarchal' and 'abuse' but somehow heels are much different. Alright, maybe we aren't breaking the foot but we're still asking women to wear oppressive footwear which slows them down and can cause them to sprain/fracture their ankles if they aren't careful.
Perhaps we ask women to wear heels because it will slow them down and hence make it easier for men to attack and assault them...ever thought about it?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: seenaymah
» Stupid or insane? Take your pick.
Posted by: H_H
» No doubt...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: No doubt...
Posted by: frosty86
» Nevertheless...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Nevertheless...
Posted by: frosty86
» I LOVE emaciated, stick-thin women!
Posted by: H_H
» RE: I LOVE emaciated, stick-thin women!
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Since men are the producers and consumers of this crap, we CAN blame them...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: ...low incomes, have little education, and were abused or assaulted as children...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: epeat after me: "No one forces women to wear makeup and uncomfortable shoes."
Posted by: frosty86
» It's a perfectly reasonable position to hold
Posted by: frosty86
» Proves my point
Posted by: H_H
» RE: Proves my point
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: Proves my point
Posted by: Falconfira
» RE: No doubt...
Posted by: MAD
» RE: No doubt...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: No doubt...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: No doubt...
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» a couple things...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: a couple things...
Posted by: mjabele
» RE: a couple things...
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: a couple things...
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Stupid or insane? Take your pick.
Posted by: axjxhx
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: frosty86
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: frosty86
» Heels make women easier to catch?
Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: thha
» RE: "Individual Choices, Collective Harms"
Posted by: frosty86
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Juniper on Jun 18, 2007 4:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a woman who has had non-traditional jobs, and it is hard enough to be taken seriously and judged on the merits of my work, without asking for special priveleges. I agree with the poster who suggested keeping the heels and makeup for off-duty hours, if you must wear them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» She was a naval officer - did she really want high heels on a ship?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: Why choose military service if fashion is so important to you?
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: heid on Jun 18, 2007 5:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Worse, though, is AlterNet's giving space to such a female, who has been so thoroughly cowed by this patriarchal society that she equates femininity with torture and inadequacy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» hmm... could be a PODIATRIST conspiracy?
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma
» RE: hmm... could be a PODIATRIST conspiracy?
Posted by: imcnotu
» Makeup
Posted by: kepstein7777
» RE: Makeup
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: H_H on Jun 18, 2007 5:56 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clearly showing that the author hasn't a single clue what the military is supposed to be about.
Hate to break it to you, but the Army really isn't the best place to show-off your Gucci heels.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Not what she was saying.
Posted by: MatthewSavage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: g on Jun 18, 2007 6:18 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And who says that being a silly person brainwashed by Cosmo and carrying an M16 are mutually exclusive? One can easily do both, as clearly seen here.
I am sorry, but a woman who thinks that wearing Miu Miu, or Payless Shoes, heels is a necessary component of femininity is not a competent intelligent woman. And a woman who thinks that the military should let her parade in the abovementioned attire is even less competent and intelligent. There is plenty of evidence that heels damage your spine. You want to be in the military, you have to accept that the dress code is there for a reason.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RaW on Jun 18, 2007 6:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In what sport - an area where competence is everything - do females wear heels or care for makeup? Tennis? Skiing? Volleyball? Surfing? Basketball? How do they wear their hair? Short or in a bun, or braided.
Other than spending hours buried in a magazine, how do you learn about Charles David or David Charles? That's time not spent learning a trade or making connections likely to advance you at work, maybe above the 'glass ceiling.'
Gee, your neck feels constricted in a collar? Try wearing a tie, with an adam's apple.
The world judges women so harshly. As opposed to men, of course. The rules for men to be judged competent at an interview include closed collar and tie, no cologne, no jewelry except a plain gold wedding band, clipped and uncolored nails, short hair no exceptions, no makeup, serious glasses, "shoes" (not pumps or wedges) - oh, and "pants," cuffs optional.
Look: Femininity isn't the same as fashion. It isn't the same as girly, or sexy. The military isn't about femininity. And competence isn't about femininity (or masculinity). When I see a guy touring the plant in a suit, I know he's not ready to run any machines. When I see a guy with spiky glistening hair, "fun" glasses, earring, bracelet, and platforms, I wonder how self-absorbed he is. Why? Because it IS silly. I'm sure he's fun at parties, every night. The glass ceiling will work against him too.
I love my women curvy, subtly aromatic, with long wavy hair - for romance. Am I coming close to blaming the victim? Well pardon me, but if you obsess about your flashy lure, and go trolling, you might get hit on.
And attention AlterNet: This is becoming tiresome. "Waaah! It's the patriarchy!" Want to see what ultimate competence looks like? Amy Goodman. She even wears skirts.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Jun 18, 2007 6:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because feminine outifts are rarely, if ever, practical and sensible. that's why men don't wear them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Without even reading the article...
Posted by: frosty86
» A robe would be pretty sensible. Look at what they wear in the middle East and Africa
Posted by: ateo
» Biggest insult for women
Posted by: suprmark
» RE: Without even reading the article...
Posted by: froggeymonkey
» Good point n/t
Posted by: ateo
» RE: Without even reading the article...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: In general I agree with you.....except for neckties, which in my opinion...
Posted by: Aussie Kim
» "Button covers"
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: scott balogh on Jun 18, 2007 7:23 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you feel wrong wear a mask?
Posted by: Aussie Kim
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karma_ran_over_dogma on Jun 18, 2007 8:04 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even if it's for real, why did AlterNet want to reprint such a blatantly anti-feminist story? The whole thing is pretty disturbing.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Apparently the military was just a way to play dress up for the author. No mention of service...
Posted by: ateo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DrJo on Jun 18, 2007 8:17 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Male makeup
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: Male makeup
Posted by: Libertine
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bobsays on Jun 18, 2007 8:48 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jun 18, 2007 10:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, people laugh at the cheezy mini-skirts from Star Trek as being sexist silliness from a show made over 40 years ago. However, kids today forget that Star Trek was on NBC from 1966 to 1968, the very time feminism was making a mark on American culture.
The mini-skirt was a symbol of sexual freedom for women. At the time, if a woman was caught with less than pearls, pumps, and a knee skirt on she was a whore. A WHORE! Ahem, yea, well, the point is... Americans still can't deal with women and sex. And considering the fact that women serving in the US military TODAY can look forward, statistically, to being raped at least once, well, ... well, if someone can explain to me why military culture in the USA has devolved to the level of Israeli border patrols, I'd like to hear it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Well the first thing you lose in your military career is your civilian sensibilities
Posted by: ateo
» RE: mini-skirts on a starship??? SPOCK!!!
Posted by: MartianBachelor
» A Bit of a Correction
Posted by: Libertine
» RE: mini-skirts on a starship??? A MAN wore a skirt!!!!
Posted by: bouyant
Comments are closed-
Posted by: poppop_schell on Jun 18, 2007 11:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cruella on Jun 18, 2007 11:13 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More about my lifestyle and views on things on my blog.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ateo on Jun 18, 2007 11:30 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that this is necessarily a bad thing for the woman's career prospects. In the office area where I work (Arlington) it seems there is an agreement not to hire unattractive young women. I'm sure the fresh college graduates who played soccer and ran cross country in college, driving the BMW their daddy just bought them for graduation have a better shot at these jobs than the single mother who worked her way through college and didn't have time to focus on staying fit or the money to buy Gucci. Is it fair? Oh hell no, but that's life. People judge you based on your appearances. That's the central tenant of the military, "APPEARANCES ARE EVERYTHING."
The judgment that males make on an attractive woman wearing make up and "flattering" clothing is that she is looking for sex or at least remotely within the realm of women that they might be able to have sex with. Again, you have to understand the psychology of the male animal. This is not the judgment that the military wants either subordinates or superiors making on their female troops.
Funny that the author laments the inability for female troops to dress "sexily" (basically) then launches into some statistics about rape and sexual assault among women in the military. How much higher would it be if instead of wearing BDU's and antiquated dress uniforms it was halter tops and mini-skirts? Much higher is the answer. Women are already afraid to leave their tent at night in deployed locations - not because of the enemy - but because male solders in the U.S. military will rape them.
Generally if you get a military guy who has been around for 10 or 15 years and ask him what he thinks of women in the military he will say they don't belong there, they cause trouble and gossip, they create a paranoid environment where people are afraid to tell jokes, and that the military would be better off without them. That is the pattern I saw repeated again and again. There is a great deal of truth to that. Any time you introduce a woman to a group of heterosexual males the chances that one or more of those males will be trying to have sex with her is somewhere around 100 percent. This means impartiality and the merit based system begin to fall apart.
You can be sexy on your time honey, that isn't what Uncle Sam is paying you for. Is that the true motivation behind the author's problems? She couldn't be "sexy enough" in the military? Many women join the military to "bag a husband." Her chances are pretty good considering even the Air Force is 80 percent male. It's simply a question of supply and demand and it's the extreme opposite of what is seen on many college campuses these days (where women out number the men slightly). Even an ugly guy would do alright in an environment that is 80% women - same goes for a mediocre female in an 80% male environment.
This whole article is ridiculous by the way. The very idea behind a uniform is to bring UNIFORMITY. That means the 40 year old overweight female NCO with 3 kids can't wear a sexy uniform that the 22 year old fit 2LT would want to wear. If you start letting people wear whatever the hell then are you even a military organization at that point? I know the conformity required in the military can be difficult for some people to adapt to, that's one reason I got out.
But don't come up with these crazy ideas that my female base commander should be walking around like this:
New female uniform?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It has to do with the psychology of men
Posted by: Bobsays
» Hard for a woman to look good in BDU's
Posted by: ateo
» RE: Hard for a woman to look good in BDU's
Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: It has to do with the psychology of men
Posted by: Logic's Edge
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lukehawk on Jun 18, 2007 12:17 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is my main problem with women in the military and this whole womens lib thing. Apparently you don't want to join the military, you want to join the girl scouts. To say you can do anything a man can in the military implies you can and WILL do whatever the f--k you are told. I understand reasonable change. The military should have womens bathrooms, be understanding of pregnancy and other female medical issues, but makeup is a luxury. In some sense the military is great due to the way it forces you to truly recognize luxury, and the way it teaches you to live without and appreciate luxury.
And finally...
Makeup?!??! Are you serious?!?!?
Pick a fight worth fighting....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: lukehawk
Posted by: MartianBachelor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: imcnotu on Jun 18, 2007 2:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» It is, and women in the military CAN wear makeup
Posted by: ateo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ankhet on Jun 18, 2007 2:54 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do better, Alternet...or did your summer intern put this one on the page while you weren't looking?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: beelzeblob on Jun 18, 2007 3:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i suppose this doesn't sound well thought out; it was more gut reaction. i'd appreciate any polite forms of criticism or commentary.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Jun 18, 2007 4:01 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The perceptions of others are undoubtedly influenced by one's dress: as this study illustrates -- but this article seems to be proposing that our perceptions of ourselves are also influenced by our clothing -- which would seem to be illogical, though not necessarily untrue.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gisele on Jun 18, 2007 6:42 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Feminine, like sexy..is an attitude - it's not a look. You can wear nothing or seven layers if you like..in either case you can be as feminine and/or sexy as you like. Both are perceptions because they're projections of the "inner you," and what you project is who you are at any given moment.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ateo on Jun 18, 2007 8:37 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So what is the writer actually arguing? That women in their BATTLE dress uniform can't wear heels and lather makeup on their faces?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Women in the military can wear makeup
Posted by: imcnotu
Comments are closed-
Posted by: karyse on Jun 18, 2007 9:31 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As an example: when I arrived at my first assignment there was porn everywhere. I depise porn because I think it is bad for everyone (male or female), but it was especially annoying because I was one of only three females in a group of about 80 males. However, I am a die-hard proponent of free speech and I realized early on that "crybabies" whether male or female from fellow airmen got more disrespect than just about any other kind of thing. My response? I purchased a bunch of Playgirls, spread them around the break room and put a life sized poster of a nude male (a very hot looking nude male) right outside of the chief's office door near the break room.
That morning as the guys came in for coffee I was sitting "reading" one of the magazines and was showing them all, as they came in, these cool naked guys. The shades of red on each of their faces was priceless and the embarassement was palpable. When the chief came out of his office for his coffee he was met by this naked, 6-foot (well hung) dude.
We were informed post haste that there would be a "formation" the next morning (everyone, he said, EVERYONE must attend and be in the uniform of the day at oh-seven-hundred).
The next morning we were read the riot act (everyone knew that I was responsible) and were told, "there will be no nude photographs anywhere in the hanger. Anyone who is caught with naked pictures anywhere, including in one's personal lockers, will get a letter of reprimand and a personal visit from me. Dismissed.)
I win. And because no one in particular got in trouble, no one was angry with me -- in fact, I believe I achieved a level of respect for my ingenuity in accomplishing what I wanted without getting in trouble myself, nor (just as importantly) not getting anyone else in trouble.
P.S. And I think wearing high heels is insane in any situation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: USAF 75-80
Posted by: fork
» RE: USAF 75-80
Posted by: Einherjar
Comments are closed-
Posted by: icha on Jun 18, 2007 11:38 PM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bigger issues that this article illustrates are things like: the military is based on an all-male model. Isn't it logical to think that in any forum there might be particular strengths that women and men have that don't necessitate making everyone into MEN?? Why is it necessary to turn everyone into identical male robots and to totally suppress the real feminine? There was an article about this a while back on Alternet, how our society suppresses the feminine, which doesn't have to do with the sex of a person, but it's a part of everyone that we tend to suppress and ridicule and treat as silly. Sure, if the goal is to stomp the hell out of a place, maybe the current model is the best one. but there might be a more productive way to go about foreign relations.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cbishopp on Jun 19, 2007 12:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though a noble cause and a noble gesture, our modern military is now less concerned with defense and more concerned with abusing other nations for the benefit of only a very small group of people. Not that this is what our soldiers want.
The military is still a necessary tool but it is being abused by both sides. The radical right wingers use the lives of your sons and daughters for their own benefit and the leftist liberals pick it apart as an organization that promotes only violence, sexism, and discord, but both are concerned only with their own agenda. In the end the result is a total breakdown of morale and a slow dismanteling of our national defense which is based not on weapons but on people. In a perfect world we would all get along and no military would be necessary but this is not the case. We should be apologizing to all those soldiers...male, female, gay or straight as they have all made great sacrifices for us and all we do is piss and moan about high heels and oil prices.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: susanhathaway on Jun 19, 2007 2:54 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: valster on Jun 19, 2007 4:44 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Makeup is allowed (in the AF at least and as far as I know in the other services) as long as it's "natural", but surely you wouldn't wear black lipstick and glittery blush to work elsewhere either.
I had "just above the collar" highlighted hair, wore black patent heels (in regulation), my somewhat sexless blue skirt, and a blue shirt. You can have your shirts fitted and tailored to fit properly (read: so you don't look pregnant).
I think I looked more feminine when working in the Air Force than I do at work now that I'm out!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: opeluboy on Jun 20, 2007 5:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, wear highheels. That oughta do it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sumonesez on Jun 21, 2007 12:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]




