Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

War on Iraq

'We Were Torturing People For No Reason' -- A Soldier's Tale

By Tara McKelvey, The American Prospect. Posted March 31, 2007.


Interrogator Tony Lagouranis says he discovered and indulged in his own evil at Abu Ghraib prison, and now fears that it will be his constant companion for the rest of his life.
Advertisement

This article is reprinted from the American Prospect.

The Torturer's Toll

Tony Lagouranis is a 37-year-old bouncer at a bar in Chicago's Humboldt Park. He is also a former torturer. That was how he was described in an email promoting a panel discussion, "24: Torture Televised," hosted by the NYU School of Law's Center on Law and Security in New York on March 21. And he doesn't shy away from the description.

As a specialist in a military intelligence battalion, Lagouranis interrogated prisoners at Abu Ghraib, Al Asad Airfield, and other places in Iraq from January through December 2004. Coercive techniques, including the use of military dogs, waterboarding, and prolonged stress positions, were employed on the detainees, he says. Prisoners held at Al Asad Airfield, which is located approximately 110 miles northwest of Baghdad, were shackled and hung from an upright bed frame "welded to the wall" in a room in an airplane hanger, he told me in a phone interview after the NYU event. When he was having problems getting information from a detainee, he recalls, the other interrogators said, "Chain him up on the bed frame and then he'll talk to you." (Lagouranis says he didn't participate directly in hangings from the frames.)

The results of the hangings, shacklings, and prolonged stress positions -- sometimes for hours -- were devastating. "You take a healthy guy and you turn him into a cripple -- at least for a period of time," Lagouranis tells me. "I don't care what Alberto Gonzales says. That's torture."

Lagouranis was on the NYU panel -- along with Jane Mayer, a New Yorker staff writer; Stephen Holmes, an NYU School of Law professor and author of an upcoming book, The Matador's Cape: America's Reckless Response to Terror; Jill Savitt, director of public programs for Human Rights First; and Wesleyan University professor Richard Slotkin -- to talk about torture and its role in the Emmy-Award-winning 24.

The show's hero, Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland), is famously ruthless in his attempts to extract information about terrorist plots from suspects in "ticking timebomb" situations. The prevailing sentiment of the show, as Mayer wrote in her February 19 New Yorker article about 24, is, "Whatever it takes." Lagouranis met with the show's creative team in California in November, she wrote. He told them that the grisly plotlines of television shows like 24 had given soldiers ideas on how to torment prisoners (for example, forcing a prisoner to listen to the sounds of men being tortured in a nearby cell -- a method that was proposed, he said, but not carried out during his time in Iraq).

The violence on 24 is horrific and almost cartoon-like in its depiction. Yet the show does have a moral conscience. One of the themes, as lead writer Howard Gordon told Mayer, is that Jack Bauer suffers over the violence he is forced to inflict on men and women in the name of national security. "Jack is basically damned," Gordon told Mayer.

Jack Bauer is, of course, a fictional character. Lagouranis, meanwhile, has seen the suffering of people who have been interrogated in Iraq. Their pain is muted in comparison to the ordeal that 24 suspects have endured. The Iraqi prisoners were not electrocuted or attacked with knives, as Mayer wrote about the terrorism suspects in 24. And Lagouranis may not be, in Hollywood discourse, "damned." But he is in a state of mind that could be described as -- at the very least -- uneasy.

Lagouranis is one of the few individuals to have spoken publicly about his experiences as an interrogator who used or saw harsh techniques inflicted on prisoners in the war. His book, Fear Up Harsh: An Army Interrogator's Dark Journey through Iraq, co-authored by Allen Mikaelian, will be published in June. But he is hardly the only one familiar with the stories. It is hard to know how many men and women have witnessed acts of detainee abuse or participated in the use of coercive interrogation methods that appear to violate international law during the Iraq war. At least nine individuals, including Lynndie R. England and her former boyfriend Charles A. Graner Jr., have been sentenced to prison for detainee-related offenses at Abu Ghraib. Others may someday face prosecution for alleged crimes and detainee abuse in the Iraq war.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, 24, torture

Tara McKelvey is a Prospect senior editor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from A Soldier Speaks! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Support the Troops
Posted by: BriMan on Mar 31, 2007 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Torture...just another form of support from Bu$hco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's going to come back home. Posted by: Artkansas
Pilot Project
Posted by: Uncle Crabby on Mar 31, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The neocons are just practicing up for the New World Order.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» let's see Posted by: orwellwasn'tdreaming
» RE: let's see Posted by: sheena2u
Torture -- America's disgrace
Posted by: HughScott on Mar 31, 2007 7:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1776, my fifth great grandfather, John Scott, a Vermont farmer, grabbed his musket and battled British oppression with Colonel Seth Warner's fierce fighting "Green Mountain Boys."

Private Scott, Col. Warner and every other freedom-loving American who served in the Revolution have to be turning in their graves over the disgrace President Bush has wrought on this country by authorizing torture.

Only cowards like AWOL George believe "rendition" works because they would be the first ones to give in to it. Case at point: the time Shrub was alone in the White House watching TV, choked on a pretzel, passed out, tumbled off the sofa, hurt himself hitting the carpeted floor and then whined to the press. Poor thing.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, registered Republican, Goldwater conservative, RABID neocon-hater (like Barry) and the editor of King-George.biz -- the only website with hardcopy proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's the same way in our domestic jails and prisons; American justice.
Posted by: Sojourner on Mar 31, 2007 8:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out the article this week in the Orange County Weekly about the inmate who was murdered by his fellow inmates who were following jail etiquette--follow the orders of whoever is in charge.

In this case, a guard let it be known that a prisoner was arrested for a "dirty crime," which means a child molester or some such. In this case, the man had been caught with child pornography. For that he got beaten to death while the guards looked the other way.

Yes, that's an extreme example. Usually inmates who are punished just get raped or crippled. What we see in Iraq is American justice--standard brand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peacemaker
Posted by: leedavis546@msn.com on Mar 31, 2007 9:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess what bothers me most About All this, is that democrats and Republicans,are doing nothing to deal with problem. We need to incurrage lawmaker's to come up with a funding bill, that will fund VA hospitals in this country.Don't add any extra's just take Care of the vets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lets tell it like it is...
Posted by: kazz67 on Mar 31, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lagouranis is one of the few individuals to have spoken publicly about his experiences as an interrogator [torturer] who used or saw harsh techniques [torture] inflicted on prisoners in the war [illegal occupation]. His book, Fear Up Harsh: An Army Interrogator's[torturer's] Dark Journey through Iraq, co-authored by Allen Mikaelian, will be published in June. But he is hardly the only one familiar with the stories. It is hard to know how many men and women have witnessed acts of detainee abuse[torture] or participated in the use of coercive interrogation methods that appear to violate international law [illegal torture] during the Iraq war [illegal occupation of Iraq]. At least nine individuals, including Lynndie R. England and her former boyfriend Charles A. Graner Jr., have been sentenced to prison for detainee-related offenses [torturing prisoners] at Abu Ghraib. Others may someday face prosecution for alleged crimes and detainee abuse [torturing prisoners] in the Iraq war [illegal occupation of Iraq].

Sorry, but I'm sick and tired of the kind of language we use these days to disguise the truth. We are an occupying force in a country that is no threat to us. And while we occupy that nation we torture its citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Answers you weren't expecting Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Answers you weren't expecting Posted by: albrechtkrausse
Agreed and Agreed...
Posted by: moonerone on Mar 31, 2007 10:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well said, kazz. I'm already leaving the country I love because I can't take any more of the politics that now prevail, on both sides, in our Nation. Maybe Belize or Honduras or......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bye Bye and Posted by: kbest
» RE: Bye Bye and Posted by: carcinoid112
» RE: Bye Bye and Posted by: kbest
» RE: Bye Bye and Posted by: smapdi_g
» RE: Bye Bye and Posted by: RV
torture is to terrorize
Posted by: bluepilgrim on Mar 31, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cross-posted from information clearinghouse:

http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/1052/1/

Any intelligence person worth anything knows torture doesn't produce useful information -- that's been known for decades, and probably centuries.

The main purpose of torture is to terrorize -- that's why the Madhi army tortures, and drills holes in victims head -- not to get information. The other victims of torture are people in the general population who are to be cowed.

The second reason is "because we can", as in Orwell's 1984 when O'Brien tells Winston that the reason for power is power itself -- it's not a means, but an end. And there we see the other victim of torture: the troops involved (not the 'fearless leaders' who order it, but the ordinary soldiers). Torturing others dehumanizes and desensitizes those who do the torturing, turning them even more into machines incapable of questioning what thay have done, and will be ordered to do in the future. For those who order it, torture IS power, and an end in itself.

Evil has no justification -- and evil requires none; evil, in evil's eyes, exists for itself. For the evil ones, terrorizing is for the sake of terror: power for power's sake, torture for torture's sake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'll get rich on Fox, you go get dead somewhere
Posted by: eddie torres on Mar 31, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...Jack Bauer suffers over the violence he is forced to inflict on men and women in the name of national security. 'Jack is basically damned,' Gordon told Mayer."

Pure class-targeted propaganda. Straight from a lead writer. Because all you dimwit low-rent redneck meth-addict trailer trash Harley-clowns in Fly-Over-America better suit up and go die for your country. So we can stay here and git rich(er).

More red-state recruiting slogans:

Hell Is For Heroes
War Is Hell
If You Ain't With Us You're Again' Us
Don't Mess With Texas
Whatever Doesn't Kill Me Makes Me Stronger
You Kin Have My Gun When You Pry It From My Cold Dead Fingers
Get With The Program
There's Only Two things That Come From Texas: Steers and Queers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We train our young men to torture people...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Mar 31, 2007 1:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
but their commanders won't allow them to write f**k on their aeroplanes, because, it's obscene... (altered quote from what movie?)

Anyone else wonder about General Peter Pace's recent declaration that 'homosexuality is immoral'? What is the current US military definition of 'morality' - torture, rape - You've got interrogators playing tapes of women being tortured and raped to male prisoners, and telling them that it's their wife being raped. That's moral, but homosexuality - oooh, that's just too nasty for words to describe. I guess when interrogators rape young Iraqi boys in front of other prisoners,as Sy Hersh reported, that's not really homosexuality - and according to Gonzales and Rumsfeld and Bush, it's not torture either, since 'major organ failure' is not involved. Lovely... just lovely. This is what our brave and fearless leaders view as 'morally acceptable behavior' - but hey, it's all okay, 'cause Bush is a 'born again Christian' who takes his orders from his Heavenly Father. If this doesn't make you want to vomit in disgust...

Apocalypse Now quote:
"I've seen horrors... horrors that you've seen. But you have no right to call me a murderer. You have a right to kill me. You have a right to do that... but you have no right to judge me. It's impossible for words to describe what is necessary to those who do not know what horror means. Horror. Horror has a face... and you must make a friend of horror. Horror and moral terror are your friends. If they are not then they are enemies to be feared. They are truly enemies. I remember when I was with Special Forces. Seems a thousand centuries ago. We went into a camp to inoculate the children. We left the camp after we had inoculated the children for Polio, and this old man came running after us and he was crying. He couldn't see. We went back there and they had come and hacked off every inoculated arm. There they were in a pile. A pile of little arms. And I remember... I... I... I cried. I wept like some grandmother. I wanted to tear my teeth out. I didn't know what I wanted to do. And I want to remember it. I never want to forget it. I never want to forget. And then I realized... like I was shot... like I was shot with a diamond... a diamond bullet right through my forehead. And I thought: My God... the genius of that. The genius. The will to do that. Perfect, genuine, complete, crystalline, pure. And then I realized they were stronger than we. Because they could stand that these were not monsters. These were men... trained cadres. These men who fought with their hearts, who had families, who had children, who were filled with love... but they had the strength... the strength... to do that. If I had ten divisions of those men our troubles here would be over very quickly. You have to have men who are moral... and at the same time who are able to utilize their primordial instincts to kill without feeling... without passion... without judgment... without judgment. Because it's judgment that defeats us."

Vietnam all over again. Lock Bush and Cheney up and throw away the key - and if someone tags them as child molestors in a state prison, well... remember the young boys being raped in Iraqi torture centers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So this guy is has written a book
Posted by: Bluesboy48 on Mar 31, 2007 7:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The orders to torture were illegal, no matter what. You can't suspend the Geneva Convention and to go againt the convention is an illegal order. For this guy to be writing a book and whining about the effect it had on him, sickens me. I don't give a damn about his feelings. He is guilty. Is Bush and Co guilty too? Yes they are, but this guy's mea culpa doesn't make his actions a bit more right. If he had any real guts, he would have stood up and said no, but he's writing a book instead, and appearing on panels to promote his book.

Should we be arresting the one's in charge? Yes, but every time I see some guy who comes out playing the victim for the terrible things he did, it make me want to puke. What about those he tortured. Where's their books? How do we believe what this guy says is true about the level of torture he performed.

I gathered intelligence during Vietnam, and I did not torture to get the information, and just because a higher up says it's OK, that doesn't make it so. Anyone with any knowledge about interrogation knows you can get more info with a hot meal and the promise of a better life than you'll ever get with torture.

I hope he has nightmares the rest of his life, and I hope the guilt eats him up. It's not enough say you're sorry when you commit war crimes of the highest order. Screw him. I hope his book tanks. Just another literary war profiteer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Minds Limit Today
Posted by: Kid Keenan on Mar 31, 2007 9:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Minds Limit Today

In Jean Amery's, The Minds Limit, his capture and descent into torture by German Nazi's, starts by pointing out that his torturers showed no "banality of evil" in their faces. First there is the "laugh" and then the "first blow." The prisoner then realizes that they are "helpless". Lost is the "trust in the world." Certainly there is no "mutual aid in nature." No. It is time for the "business room. "This is more commonly referred to as the "Black Room" in today's parlance.

But before describing his own torture the author makes "good on a promise I gave." Not that they where not specialists in torture, but more so his conviction that "torture was the essence of Nationalist Socialism....more accurately stated, why it was precisely in torture that the Third Reich materialized in all the density of its being."

I ask you dear Citizens should we also "codify" that the detainees at Camp X-ray can also be children as recently reported in the news? Not only does that sound slightly like the rule of anti-man but I do believe anti-child included. And if that is so then the rule practiced as such has "expressly established it as a principle." So just what else in "essence" does go on at Camp Xray? "Tricks?” Plead mercy, pray tell? And now comes news on Abu Graib.

Refuse Himmler’s offer for a Certificate of Maturity in History and stop those jet flights I would suggest, Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld. Nay, to forsake the Constitution and be depraved of our humanity would be more painful in the end. Slavery to torture is all you will get. Go tell that to the Marines. And why Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld haven't you two already tendered your resignation? (One down more to go!)

At least Hitler was restrained from jettisoning the Geneva Conventions even with his back against the wall in February of 1945. I smell now the chief prosecutor Jackson's closing arguments at the Nuremberg trials.

I am Citizen Michael John Keenan


Dear Michael Keenan,

Thank you for sending your evocative reflection. The appeal to compassion, clarity and basic human decency is well stated. In re-reading it I was curious if the word "depraved" was intended for a double meaning, or if perhaps "deprived" had been mistyped (3rd to last paragraph). Your point of torture being the essence of the Third Reich was central to Orwell's "1984," where O'Brien (?) told Winston (delicious irony there) that the whole point of the State was to exert absolute control over the individual down to the internal though processes, and the measure of this control was the ability to inflict pain at will. This is the essence of authoritarianism, and authoritarians require they be worshiped as Gods by their subjects, hence "love your torturers." Your questions to Cheney and Rumsfeld can only be rhetorical because there is probably no capacity (please forgive me, Buddha) in either of those individuals to appreciate the logic and the essential compassion behind your message. They are blinded by the reflection of their self-images within the confines of their own logic-bubbles blown out of a film of denial.

Kind regards,

XXXXX

(the name a author who reported about someone who was tortured and responded to my post above under "Were our Fathers this bad?" after I emailed them this post to them.
See http://hnn.us/board.php?id=23297.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Mind's Limit Today II
Posted by: Kid Keenan on Mar 31, 2007 9:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear XXXXX

I am glad you appreciated what I wish more of my fellow citizens would be a little more vociferous about. I hope your first hand account will create an infection to even give a damn and realize that on the whim of one person that this fate possibly waits them too. The L.A. Times rebuffed three attempts I made to have it printed with permission. Finally I expressed my concerns directly by email to Mr. Bush's office. To my surprise he responded in the press a few days later that torture is not a value of this Nation's "soul" or "being."

Slowly those in power are transforming the individual into being treated basically as private property once again. Unfortunately, this includes both the military and civilian alike. The once indentured black man became accepted and considered private property in less than two generations. People from Africa soon got caught up into this and this went on for about thirteen generations. So given Cheney's proclivity to apartheid and this history of privatizing the individual, I am not surprised to find a growing rejection of the separation between the individual and the state underway in the country I love. And once there is no distinction or separation any longer between the two of them then torture WILL become the "being" of the nation. Under this modern version there will no longer be a distinction as to color. All are eligible for the black room. I have to wonder if this nation’s soul was still born in its conception when I ponder all of this. Or if we still have any soul yet left to speak of and if so will it be lost in less than a generation or even worse in less than a night?

Further, Bush never read a single report on the people that were led to the death chamber. So any claim to compassion - to suffer with - went missing when he refused to read even one report. As if with depravity he even dares to laugh in a woman’s face. Deprived of life this woman now has more soul in death than this man will ever have in life.

The questions asked of Cheney after a speech he gave at a Davos, Switzerland get together I found to borderline on outright ridicule. The isolation of Cheney by the Davos body and in effect the United States was quite palpable. Your version of the bubble I agree does appear to exist. I found these questions on his own web page right under his nose by scrolling down. So I am sure he does not even see it as you pointed out.

What else will I be called to bear witness too by those who claim falsely to be my fellow citizens and who accept torture as a second nature? Do they not know that the word citizen or the word individual allows for no definition, which accepts the philosophy of anti-man nor anti-women? That by accepting torture, any definition of torture, that this country's history is then removed in one fell swoop. Gone is the cry of Peoples Sovereignty born of the English Civil War. And gone too is the claim that people after the U.S. Civil War will never again be considered as just some owners private property in this nations economy. And what in their place now reigns but the concept of the Corporation as a person? Banished is the so-called Constitution of the United States. So why not now that the Articles of the Confederation are back in vogue and unimpeded by any Bill of Rights. This will work just fine. Ultimately, the dead corpse of a Corporation is venerated over the flesh and blood of the living.

Welcome all to Corporate Feudalism where all shall love and worship the new State Torturer who rules the World Supreme.

You bear your witness well my friend. I hope, as God is my Fuhrer, to bear my witness just as well should they decide to ever come for this human being.

Thanks for pointing out the possible meanings in my choice of words.

May a happy trail be before you sir.

I am Citizen Michael John Keenan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dear Tony
Posted by: Kid Keenan on Mar 31, 2007 9:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sounds like Tony Lagouranis has refused Himmler’s offer for a Certificate of Maturity by the looks of it to me. His testimony and witness and the burden he will bear has already had a salubrious effect on the community for the truths that it holds. Thanks so much for "I hope your first hand account will create an infection to even give a damn and realize that on the whim of one person that this fate possibly waits them too."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANOTHER GOOD GERMAN
Posted by: charlieparisek on Apr 1, 2007 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a man. And now a soon-to-be author.

Scumbag.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

another missed point
Posted by: cacky on Apr 1, 2007 12:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many or most of the tortured suspects are going to be innocent. All kinds of people get swept up in this crap. Does this mean nothing, kbest?
It also appears to me that acts of torture do not prevent anything. That's a made-for-tv, one in a million scenario.
What it looks more like is that we have simply deemed all Muslims worthy of torture. It won't prevent, but it will provoke. Then there's the moral and psychological damage to the torutrer. Snap out of it, America. On both the moral and practical planes, torture is not sane.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: another missed point Posted by: cacky
Tough Sh*t
Posted by: paschn on Apr 1, 2007 5:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lackey. You know the word? It's because of Lackeys cowards like Bush, Cheney, and swine like them throughtout history have been able to murder millions and, dare I say it? TORTURE! An army from a country FIFTY TIMES the size of Iraq, invades, steals, rapes, murders and you sunzabitches laud em as "heroes" and "our boys". Why? because they too are fine examples of spawn from the benevolent United States?? Because we have to claim the cowards you embrace them as heroes? This Evil Empire you call home has a horrible history of murdering and invading based on LIES. SwineBush isn't the first, nor will he be the last. Why do you think Kissinger doesn't leave the U.S.? While you all plaster your "support our Troops" stickers on your bumpers, "our boys", (as they did in the phillipines, Mexico, Spain etc) invade weaker countries based on lies, to murder, rape steal. Do they have Carte Blanche and a "hero" sticker based on nothing more than your stupidity? Any fool can rally with slugs of his own ilk and go along with the flow. had they WANTED to, they too could have seen through the lies and Bullshit of SwineBush et al and simply said no. As with the lies, these cowards ALLOWED themselves to torture to death human beings with families for Haliburton/Israel/Bush and you fools allowed it, and you fools will let him, (Bush), get away with it. I hope every one of the cowards involved in these cowardly acts wakes up for years at night imagining their victims have come back from the dead, somehow gained the upper hand and, smiling back from a ghostly face wreacs revenge, hell not revenge, justice on them in the quiet of their dreams for the rest of their lives. Then, after decades of their dream horrors, when they gasp their last breath, then they will answer to their creator. And boys, he doesn't own a SINGLE STOCK in Haliburton. So you have THAT to keep you warm in the dead of night, you "heroes" you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tough Sh*t Posted by: hellofriends
» RE: Tough Sh*t Posted by: sheena2u
omg
Posted by: ShoShenQ on Apr 1, 2007 3:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dubya aint findin' terrorists, he is creating new ones !!

Stop the Evil Man pls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the bombs start exploding and your family starts dying...
Posted by: ateo on Apr 1, 2007 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
then we'll see how far you are willing to go for the survival of you and yours. The only way this self-righteous dribble can pass is in a war such as the one we are currently engaged, a war that the vast majority of you do not feel any negative effects from. The war is a thing that exists only in words and still photography, it is something far away and disconnected.

Let nukes start going off in major U.S. cities, let a few hundred thousand Americans die and then we'll be sitting around wondering where all of our high minded idealism went as we round up every Arab and Muslim in the U.S. Not only that, but we will commit heinous acts not seen in the Western world since they were committed against our troops by the Vietcong/Chinese.

If you're not willing to do that which is necessary for survival then what can I say to you other than perhaps you are not meant to survive. Fortunately for you some of us are willing to go to any extreme for the survival of ourselves, our tribe (family) and nation and we'll drag you along with us kicking and screaming.

A few hundred years ago the people who weren't willing to do whatever it took to survive didn't. In some parts of the world today those unwilling to do what it takes to survive don't. Thank your lucky stars that you live in the United States and enjoy the protection of the strong individuals who lead and keep our nation running towards prosperity and survival. For you are defenseless sheep, ready to be preyed upon by any who choose to use and abuse you for their personal gain.

Ah, ignorance is bliss but some of us live in the real world - lucky for you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh and by the way Posted by: ateo
» RE: Oh and by the way Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Oh and by the way Posted by: sheena2u
» RE: Ateo you are a sociopath Posted by: sheena2u
» WHAT'S YOURS IS MINE Posted by: charlieparisek
» BLOOD FOR BANDWIDTH? Posted by: charlieparisek
» RE: Oh and by the way Posted by: Rolomax
» You must kick ass at D&D Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» You must get exhausted typing N/T Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» Oh, and by the way II Posted by: Rolomax
» Go beat your wife... Posted by: Habaro
» My bad Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» Thanks, tanks! Posted by: Habaro
» That's soooo N/T! Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» This is good stuff. Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» RE: The difference is... Posted by: ateo
» Where's... Posted by: Habaro
» Don't you mean, North Korean? Posted by: James T. Swaggart
» RE: The difference is... Posted by: ateo
» RE: The difference is... Posted by: 1984NOW!!!
» RE: That is possible Posted by: ateo
» RE: That is possible Posted by: bodo
» RE: That is possible Posted by: 1984NOW!!!
» RE: That is possible Posted by: sheena2u
Unfortunately, not a new story
Posted by: fanny666 on Apr 2, 2007 4:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some truly patriotic members of the 82nd Airborne tried over and over to get their story out... when they couldn't get press, the went to Human Rights Watch... read their words from almost 2 years ago now...

PDF

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet is Doing An Excellent Job
Posted by: TerryS on Apr 2, 2007 8:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kudos to Alternet for reporting again and again
on this horrible evil being done in our name.

"If torture isn't evil, then there is no such
thing as evil"

Also my highest regard to Alternet for it's
coverage of the corrosive effects of Jack
Bauer and 24. Alternet is one of the very
few liberal/left-wing news sources to take
a stand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you think there COULD be "a reason" for torture, you are begging the only important question!
Posted by: fool-on-the-hill on Apr 4, 2007 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Torture is morally wrong -- and ineffective! -- and those are the REASONs for NOT using this barbaric method of dealing with adversaries. Period.

To imagine that torture is OK, so long as you "know" the victim deserves it, is not just a slippery slope, IT IS THE ABYSS.

Moreover, "intelligence" gained with torture is notoriously unreliable: after enough of it, ANYONE will be "confessing" to everything from plotting 9/11 to bearing Elvis's love child! From neither a moral nor a practical viewpoint is torture EVER defensible.

Retribution has NO END. "Blowback" is inevitable, ALWAYS.

No one can put out a fire with gasoline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

jackahouston@msn.com
Posted by: SNEEZIEH on Apr 4, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Iraq invasion's only purpose was for the American Petroleum Institute members to gain control of Iraq's trillions of dollars of petroleum reserves. The primary nations insisting that Iraq be invaced were The Netherlands (Dutch Shell); British Commonwelth (British Petroleum) and the United States (American Petroleum Institute members, Exxon-Mobile, Chevron-Texaco, Conoco-Phillips, Shell, BP and others). The next step is Iran for the same reasons. QUESTIONS: How many barrels of oil is a dead G.I. worth? How many barrels of oil is a wounded G.I. worth? How many barresl of oil are dead and wounded civilians worth? I have been asking these questions in emails and letters before the invasion began. Bush and his petroleum monopoly buddies were gung ho to get there and didn't have brains to take into account that a certain percentage of the pupulation will resist invaders. It has happened throughout history as far back as humans have existed. This from a disabled WW2 veteran who enlisted in Dec. 1942 and out in Dec. 1945. The old saying is "G.I.s are expendable. A new crop is born everyday!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bobvz@cox.net
Posted by: Robert Veasey on Apr 4, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Better an enemy be tortured utilizing somewhat benign methods than millions of Americans die from nuclear poisoning, chemical attacks or biological agents unleashed upon our cities.

Better an enemy be tortured utilizing these somewhat benign methods than our men and women in uniform suffer the consequences of our upside down forced civility.

Better an enemy be tortured in a somewhat benign method than it is to have our troops die in greater numbers or our troop movements and positions be compromised due to a lack of verifiable intelligence.

Getting the intelligence we absolutely need is job #1.

Utilizing the intel to protect our men and women in harm's way AND killing the enemy before the dumb bastard has a chance to kill one of ours and........is Job #2.

Job #3 is learn from mistakes and to then go back to be more effective at doing Job #1.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: bobvz@cox.net Posted by: heliosweb
» RE: bobvz@cox.net Posted by: Robert Veasey
» ALMOST WITH YOU, BOB Posted by: charlieparisek
» RE: ALMOST WITH YOU, BOB Posted by: Robert Veasey
» YOU MISSED THE POINT, BOB Posted by: charlieparisek
» bobvz@cox.net Posted by: Robert Veasey
» LET'S TRY 'BENIGN METHODS' Posted by: charlieparisek
» RE: LET'S TRY 'BENIGN METHODS' Posted by: Robert Veasey
a personal experience with torture
Posted by: thefoc on Apr 5, 2007 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in 1973 I had the experience of being tortured. Some mexican police wanted me to confess to something I had had nothing to do with. I could prove this but the mood had nothing to do with finding out what actually was true in the situation--my captors had already decided that I was quilty and it was, for them, just a matter of getting me to confess. This was difficult for me because I had not the faintest idea of what they were talking about, and of course no interest at all in confessing to what sounded like a capital crime--homicide! So, they took myself and another man out to a remote area in the hills and started by beating the other guy with rifles in the ribs while I stood there watching, waiting for my turn. At this point I became very rational. My fight or flight reflex was coming up and I became aware that my bowels were full. I figured I had a better chance of not rupturing internally during what was coming if I took a shit first and asked permission. I was surprised that it