comments_image Comments

Pro-Gay Parade's About Face On Whistleblower: San Francisco Pride Honors Chelsea Manning

The SF Pride board seeks to correct last year's mistake: rescinding its decision to pay homage to Chelsea Manning.

A mural of Chelsea Manning.
Photo Credit: Timothy Krause/Flickr


Last year, the San Francisco Pride organization invited scandal upon itself by revoking a popularly elected Grand Marshal status from whistleblower Chelsea Manning, and bungling the subsequent public relations nightmare that followed. One result was Manning supporters coming out en masse to form one of the largest contingents in the history of the parade—itself the largest of its kind in the United States.

Another result seems to be a dramatic turnover in the organization’s Board of Trustees.

The new SF Pride board, elected in the fall of 2013, is composed heavily of candidates who ran on a democracy and transparency slate following the Manning scandal. Now, one of its first public moves is a public reversal of its predecessors’ party line: Chelsea Manning will be an honorary Grand Marshall for the 2014 Parade and Celebration.

The decision was reached unanimously at a February 4 board meeting. Recognizing that opinions within the LGBTQ community vary widely regarding whistleblowers, Board President Gary Virginia says that Pride mishandled the electoral process for community grand marshal in 2013, and that this move to honor her in 2014 reflects the membership’s wishes.

“I want to publicly apologize to Chelsea Manning and her supporters on behalf of SF Pride, and we look forward to a proper honor this year,” Virginia said in a late-February press release.

The press release elaborates:

Many of SF Pride’s members have called on the board to recognize Chelsea Manning at this year’s event, thus making amends to her and the LGBT community for the handling of her election as grand marshal last year.  Private Manning had been elected a grand marshal for 2013 but the honor was later revoked by the 2013 board, provoking sustained controversy and serious objections from the membership. The board’s action to honor Manning in 2014 reflects the membership’s wishes in this matter.

Joey Cain, who served on the board previously from 1998 to 2006, including four years as president, is among the new board members from the dominant pro-transparency slate.

“I felt like I needed to be on the board in order to provide an experienced, historical perspective,” he says.

Cain was active in the grassroots effort to have Manning reinstated as a community marshal in 2013, and blames procedural and governance breakdowns for the incident last year.

“To me that was indicative there was probably something deeper that was wrong about how organization was being handled,” he says. “I've since come to find that many of the people on the board at the time didn’t know about the decision until after it was made.”

Still, Cain says, the way the board handled the situation only aggravated the situation, alienating many members of the LGBTQ community.

Cain also believes that political pressure was likely exerted on the 2013 board to revoke Manning’s honorary marshal status.

While such evidence may never appear, it is impossible to conceive of the 2013 controversy in a vacuum. A specific but vocal group of pro-military gay soldiers had balked when Manning was initially announced as a marshal. Meanwhile, Manning herself, on the eve of her court martial remained a controversial figure liable to worry some of the parade’s corporate sponsors—as poignantly noted by The Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald. Then there was the presence of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a prominent Democrat under Obama, who on video had already declared Manning guilty prior to trial.

Whatever went down behind-the-scenes last year, the new SF Pride board says it is committed to honoring transparency along with Manning going forward. These may not be the only changes people can expect at the SF Pride parade this summer.

See more stories tagged with: