COMMENTS: 151
Michael Moore's Action Plan: 15 Things Every American Can Do Right Now
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Take Action headlines via email.
Friends,
It's the #1 question I'm constantly asked after people see my movie: "OK -- so now what can I do?!"
You want something to do? Well, you've come to the right place! 'Cause I got 15 things you and I can do right now to fight back and try to fix this very broken system.
Here they are:
FIVE THINGS WE DEMAND THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS DO IMMEDIATELY:
1. Declare a moratorium on all home evictions. Not one more family should be thrown out of their home. The banks must adjust their monthly mortgage payments to be in line with what people's homes are now truly worth -- and what they can afford. Also, it must be stated by law: If you lose your job, you cannot be tossed out of your home.
2. Congress must join the civilized world and expand Medicare For All Americans. A single, nonprofit source must run a universal health care system that covers everyone. Medical bills are now the #1 cause of bankruptcies and evictions in this country. Medicare For All will end this misery. The bill to make this happen is called H.R. 3200 (but only with Rep. Anthony Weiner's amendment). You must call AND write your members of Congress and demand its passage, no compromises allowed.
3. Demand publicly-funded elections and a prohibition on elected officials leaving office and becoming lobbyists. Yes, those very members of Congress who solicit and receive millions of dollars from wealthy interests must vote to remove ALL money from our electoral and legislative process. Tell your members of Congress they must support campaign finance bill H.R.1826.
4. Each of the 50 states must create a state-owned public bank like they have in North Dakota. Then congress MUST reinstate all the strict pre-Reagan regulations on all commercial banks, investment firms, insurance companies -- and all the other industries that have been savaged by deregulation: Airlines, the food industry, pharmaceutical companies -- you name it. If a company's primary motive to exist is to make a profit, then it needs a set of stringent rules to live by -- and the first rule is "Do no harm." The second rule: The question must always be asked -- "Is this for the common good?" (Click here for some info about the state-owned Bank of North Dakota.)
5. Save this fragile planet and declare that all the energy resources above and beneath the ground are owned collectively by all of us. Just like they do it in Sarah Palin's socialist Alaska. We only have a few decades of oil left. The public must be the owners and landlords of the natural resources and energy that exists within our borders or we will descend further into corporate anarchy. And when it comes to burning fossil fuels to transport ourselves, we must cease using the internal combustion engine and instruct our auto/transportation companies to rehire our skilled workforce and build mass transit (clean buses, light rail, subways, bullet trains, etc.) and new cars that don't contribute to climate change. (For more on this, here's a proposal I wrote in December.) Demand that General Motors' de facto chairman, Barack Obama, issue a JFK man-on-the-moon-style challenge to turn our country into a nation of trains and buses and subways. For Pete's sake, people, we were the ones who invented (or perfected) these damn things in the first place!!
FIVE THINGS WE CAN DO TO MAKE CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENT LISTEN TO US:
1. Each of us must get into the daily habit of taking 5 minutes to make four brief calls: One to the President (202-456-1414), one to your Congressperson (202-224-3121) and one to each of your two Senators (202-224-3121). To find out who represents you, click here. Take just one minute on each of these calls to let them know how you expect them to vote on a particular issue. Let them know you will have no hesitation voting for a primary opponent -- or even a candidate from another party -- if they don't do our bidding. Trust me, they will listen. If you have another five minutes, click here to send them each an email. And if you really want to drop an anvil on them, send them a snail mail letter!
Stay up to date with the latest Take Action headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seksi on Oct 22, 2009 11:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are not on facebook you can help by staying informed - do a google news search for the phrase "Weiner amendment" every single day until the floor debate begins...
Your searches are measurable, and as the interest in this builds, the media will respond with better coverage of this story.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wrinklemomma on Oct 22, 2009 6:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sullidave on Oct 23, 2009 1:04 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you really want things to change, why don't you lead by example. Give your money to the poor.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: He is leading by example, he makes movies
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Hey Mike, put your money where your mouth is.
Posted by: Brb007
» Dismantle Goldman Sachs
Posted by: weathered
» Hey sullidave we're all broke here, show a little grace and dignity.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Hey sullidave, Do the math.
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Hey sullidave, Do the math.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Hey sullidave, Do the math.
Posted by: Crazy H
» Preparation H says, "1 + 1 = 6". Doh!
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Billie Boi's daily off topic personal attack...
Posted by: Crazy H
» Yeah, irony is never lost on you, is it, hypocrite? Or was that nut-bar?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Yo Preparation H, what's this, jerkoff?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Yo Preparation H, what's this, jerkoff?
Posted by: Birdland
» Bite me, bird-brain.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Shooting the messenger
Posted by: Karlh
» Hey, sullidave, have you led by example?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Hey Mike, put your money where your mouth is.
Posted by: hourglass
» RE: Hey Mike, put your money where your mouth is.
Posted by: EJLima
Comments are closed-
Posted by: overseas on Oct 23, 2009 1:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Little House is all about Hollywood's love affair with banks. We're all in Walnut Grove now.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Oct 23, 2009 2:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy
Posted by: DavidMac
» RE: Direct Democracy
Posted by: Crazy H
» "Pure Democracy"??? "Pure Democracy" is Orwellian doublethink for Mob Rule.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: "Pure Democracy"??? "Pure Democracy" is Orwellian doublethink for Mob Rule.
Posted by: truth+equality
» RE: Leverage
Posted by: kikiriki
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Oct 23, 2009 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The relationships between inequality and the prevalence of health and social problems...suggest that if the United States was to reduce its income equality to something like the average of the four most equal of the rich countries (Japan, Norway, Sweden and Finland), the proportion of the population feeling that they could trust others might rise by 75 per cent--presumably with matching improvements in the quality of community life; rates of mental illness and obesity might similarly each be cut by almost two-thirds, teenage birth rates could be more than halved, prison populations might be reduced by 75 per cent, and people could live longer while working the equivalent of two months less per year.
Now who can argue against that?
Thanks, Michael Moore--once again!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: remember the saying, "Lead, follow or get out of the way" when you contact your reps
Posted by: jrgjniew
» "May" is a better choice it implies a conditional state that is intolerable.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 23, 2009 4:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recall that they were getting deluged with phone calls, emails, faxes and letters running 8 or 9 to 1 AGAINST that bill?
What did Congress do? They told We the People to shove it and passed the damned thing.
We're way past the point of sending letters or making calls to our Congress, they don't give a damn what us serfs think, they only seek to keep happy Wall Street, the Pentagon and Israel.
Back in 1789, the French got tired of seeing the wealthy elite living like pigs on their labor while the average family was starving to death and living in hovels while the upper crust were living in castles.
Their solution was a bit messy, but it damn sure got the King's attention.
And that's what we're dealing with; American royalty by right of money and power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, it got the king's attention but only briefly, he was beheaded.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: jrgjniew
» You astutely mention the most vexing issue facing America: nudity at the beach.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: You astutely mention the most vexing issue facing America: nudity at the beach.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: "...and look at France now..."
Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: FAITHCARR
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: Crazy H
» Rep. Ron Kind listens to lobbyists, not people
Posted by: wiscorad
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: earthman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrgjniew on Oct 23, 2009 4:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Unionize? That, for the most part, is also a waste of money. Internal corruption and politics is worse inside unions than out. They constantly extort all they can from the companies, instead of what is "right" or "fair". ref GM, Ford, etc. (just think what a car would cost, and how many more of us could afford them, if those workers made $15/hr, like most of us, instead of the $70+ they were reportedly getting). The members pay dues to support the laziness and lavish lifestyles of the union bosses. Their goal is to make the members happy by pushing for more pay and more perks for less work. Also, they want as many new positions created(job shop) to get more members and dues, regardless of how inefficient this makes a company. small companies, like you would think Moore would support, cannot afford to pay someone only to run a forklift for instance, when you only need a forklift for 1 hr/day.(This also happened in a 6 employee company near us---it folded. The employees told the union they were happy and not to force this---but the union told them---you are part of our union, this is how we do it, you will too. They are now jobless). In reality, they just make products more expensive for those of us that are non-inion. If everyone had all those benefits and pay, then their would be no advantage to joining the union---everything would just be higher priced.
3. Worker owned companies can work, but a couple near us collapsed for very obvious reasons--the owners took care of themselves at the expense of non-owner employees, and at expense of the company itself. As owners, they were not held accountable for their responsivbilities, etc. Simply imploded. People are still people. No bank, including a community bank or credit union, can support a business that cannot show positive cash flow. "Oh, I see, you cna't pay your loan, which is really other members of our community's money, because you are paying yourself 3x what the average person is making, you don't feel, as an owner, that you need to show up to work on a regular basis toperform your duties, but we should loan your company more money to keep going...." NOT
4. Moore is a hypocrit. He is profiting from the dollars the poor pay to see his movies. Perhaps if he made these movies with his own money, then gave them to movie theaters for free, with the caveat that they had to show them for free, would he be credible. Of course he can't do this--but how about $1? He critcizes the company execs, and in some cases rightly so---noone is worth those kind of dollars, but lets put things in perspective.....A large company exec making $1-10mil/year vs. a movy starlet making that much or more for 1 movie! The exec is a job slave to that co. The starlet--move on to make more movies. Has he criticized his own industry??? Let's call a spade a spade.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Moore is not rich, he is just able to pay his bills. Control your jealousy.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Bad Unions! Bad! Bad!
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: voodoo economics
Posted by: paulaH
» RE: "...the owners took care of themselves ..."
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: morgan1 on Oct 23, 2009 4:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We will take back our country county by county, city by city and finally state by state until the federal govt. doesn't matter or it is our once more: And better.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Perhaps the form letter response addressed your formed writing.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: morgan1
Posted by: wtfo
» INHOFE, COBURN, AND COLE ARE MY WASHINGTON DELEGATION. LISTENING IS NOT THEIR FORTE. WHAT WOULD
Posted by: Raymond Emerson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Farasien on Oct 23, 2009 4:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reality is we live in an oligarchy. The corporations (and us, but do so at a WAY lower rate), through lobbyists pay the politicians and give them a future 'speaking tour' career once they tire of raping us all while in office. Until we can outlaw lobbies- really outlaw them, not just make them blaze', as is the current trend, we will NOT be listened to. Scream all you want, say whatever you want on any TV or radio show, call whomever you like, write your 'elected' officials a ream of letters and a gigabyte of emails every day of the week if you want, but it all goes in the trash, the recycle bin on the desktop or gets routed to a drone whose job it is to politely ignore what you are saying. Unless your complaint letter has a (minimum) $10,000 check paperclipped to it, nobody hears you. In situations like this, the only thing that can fix the system is to start hanging people and then rewrite the law repealing corporate personhood and outlawing lobbies. Until we do that, all we're doing is screaming at the choir. It feels cathartic to do so, but no real action begins until blood preceeds it.
Don't believe me? Go read some history. Tyranny and corruption are only expelled by burning it out- not politely accepting it and turning a blind eye to the truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Disco Inferno - "burn, baby, burn." I think we're too late for this.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Oct 23, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's next for him? Maybe a Nobel Prize?
He is a hypocritical entertainer, a capitalist wolf in socialist sheep's clothing.
He could use a personal trainer and a image stylist, too. He always looks like sh*t.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is this a "5-year Plan"? Or a "Great Leap Fowrd"?
Posted by: fred_53_99
» RE: Is this a "5-year Plan"? Or a "Great Leap Fowrd"?
Posted by: dogtor
» RE: Is this a "5-year Plan"? Or a "Great Leap Fowrd"?
Posted by: dogtor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erin on Oct 23, 2009 5:08 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Calling is a joke
Posted by: dogtor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: m/r on Oct 23, 2009 5:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the 'oligarchy' statement- and the fact that some basic issues need changing, ie the the idea that corps. are recognized as persons. Our daughter spent 4 weeks in Stockholm- she said she would prefer to raise her kids there. I have spent time in Europe;no, it is not paradise...however it is Civilized. We had our civil war, now do we need to be bombed out of our homes to get to our very own "Marshall Plan" ? No. I think we can skip that part and move to Reconstruction via our already in place republican/democratic process. Naysayers, as exemplified here with observations of M Moores'lack of "style" are a waste of time. ... continued...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 2 cents / clarification
Posted by: m/r
» RE: 2 cents
Posted by: wtfo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 23, 2009 5:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have looted our national treasure.
They have abandoned their constituency in favor of a multi-national corporate behemoth and an out-of-control military industrial complex.
They have created a global, geo-political catastrophe in the Middle East that will take at least a century to remedy.
They have shoveled a generation of American children into an untenable slaughterhouse in Iraq.
They have engendered an economic nightmare so immense that generations yet unborn will still be bearing its burden.
They have sold our nation's soul to the highest corporate bidder.
They have made a mockery of the First Amendment.
They have squandered a trillio-plus dollar surplus with a tax cut for a class of people who didn't need it.
They have gutted vital social programs that aid the poor and the elderly which have been in place for over seventy years.
They have gutted laws meant to protect working men and women.
They have plundered the environment.
They have depleted our educational system.
They have hijacked this nation's political dialogue.
They have ruined our international reputation.
They have handed our domestic agenda over to religious fanatics.
They have stolen two national elections.
They have trampled on our constitution.
They have sent our Bill of Rights through the sausage grinder....
They must never, ever be allowed to govern our country again.
The grand old party is over.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Erin
» Bury them as deep as possible, Tom, the next time we need them will be for fossile fuel.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: baldo
» Correction....
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Correction....
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Birdland
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN...
Posted by: farmer's daughter
» RE: Number 17: STOP VOTING DEMOCRAT
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: Number 18: VOTE WITH YOUR HEART AND MIND INSTEAD OF BY PARTY.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Terrytom RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Terrytom
» RE: Number 19: Vote based upon your own observations and experience and never, ever
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: m/r on Oct 23, 2009 5:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you think Obama received the majority of the popular vote? WE did it! In our P J's.
No guns, no marches, no flag waving.
WE control the media by our google searches as mentioned in the first post. Just keep hitting that 'search' button. CNN, et al pick it up immediately- people like us are busy being paid to track. You know that! We all know this.
Let's use it. We cannot wait. Let's try it now for a public plan for health care. Every action needs the frontline. WE are the frontline! We have already demanded and are receiving Fairness on overpaid bank execs. In my 60+ years- this is the first time the gov't has put the brakes on EXCESS and GREED! It Can be done. Keep on truckin', I say- send those e mails, letters, make the phone calls. Wallpaper your bathroom with the form letters that come in response- and...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: texasdav on Oct 23, 2009 5:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If 10% of the population with participate in a vote-out-the-incumbent drive we could change everything. Campaign finance reform and term limits would go a long way toward fixing the problem but the corporations are the ones writing legislation so it will never happen.
We can change this country with our votes. Don't consider their political party affiliation. The Dems and the Repubs are one and the same "corporate" party. If we throw out every incumbent during the next election you can bet the rest of the worthless bunch will sit up and take notice. (Especially those veteran politicians with multiple terms.)
Spread the word on every blog.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Get rid of incumbents
Posted by: Erin
» RE: Get rid of incumbents
Posted by: Kate55
» No Dems or Repubs, only the 'Corporate War Party'
Posted by: Lese Majeste
» RE: Get rid of incumbents not going to happen via third party
Posted by: mikebppa
» RE: Get rid of incumbents not going to happen via third party
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Get rid of incumbents not going to happen via third party
Posted by: mikebppa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: m/r on Oct 23, 2009 5:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"afraid" of this administration and it's actions- I say "AMERICA- LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT"
F*#ch. That's what we heard in the '60's whenever we walked in a line for the Table Grape boycott for migrant workers- for civil rights, for women's rights. We,The People Have the Power- and it is easier than ever to
Participate. I have not seen Moore's movie and likely will not pay movie prices to see it. I don't need to. We "saw" this movie when 4 kids were shot down in Ohio by our own military. When I watched as a young woman had her legs beaten in Chicago in '68. I would not wish any of that on anyone- but I do wish anyone reading this will ACT. Thank you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Oct 23, 2009 6:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, free money - Citibank in particular is an odious institution. They got us into this mess, let them finance our recovery.
Now that I'm employed again - I'm making minimum payments. I've got a year ... and when it's over, I can pick up another "zero interest on balance transfers" card.
(uhh, word to the unwise: don't try floating a bigger & bigger debt. You *do* have to pay it off eventually.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Oct 23, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just thought I'd get all of that out of the way for some of you, and let you proceed instantly to other cynicism.
Any time any person or group affected big change, there were plenty of moments when things looked hopeless. Probably if you could all up all the emotional reactions by the activists during the time of striving you'd see more hopeless, wondering-if-it's-all-futile plugging away than moments of "woohoo! Victory is just around the corner!" Hindsight is not 20/20, it's delusional when looking at activist movements. None of those involved knew if failure was about to crash down. The historical moments of victory we see looking back were not inevitable in the minds of those trying. What they thought was that you keep trying for what is right, and you do it whether or not it seems to be working. You do it as long as it takes. If your elected officials seem to ignore you, why aren't you nailing them for that? Writing LTEs? Making it a campaign issue when they run for reelection?
Thank god Michael Moore doesn't think the way so many here do. If he did, he'd never have made a single movie. He would only have made movies if they fairly quickly accomplished the goal addressed in the film. But no one much thinks he's ineffective because that didn't happen, right?
You're all right, YOUR single phone call doesn't affect too much. It's yours combined with mine and everyone else's that do matter. If you look at single instances when it didn't work, you're probably giving in in a way that makes the evildoers very, very happy. They want you silent. They want you to never tell your congressmen anything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daw13 on Oct 23, 2009 6:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUILD ORGANIZATION
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james_allen on Oct 23, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My only comment to Alternetters would be: Go a little easier on Barack Obama, who may be doing as good a job as possible! The credit crisis did not have easy solutions. The U.S. President is not a dictator but must cope with Congress and opinion-makers who are definitely NOT liberal.
I was amazed when I confirmed, on the websites of authentic liberal organizations, that Obama did indeed have "the most liberal voting record" of any Senator in 2007. I consider Obama to be an intelligent and good-spirited centrist, rather than a liberal; that 99 other Senators were to his right seemed shocking ... and more than a little sad.
I must say I was amazed -- and saddened -- by some of the other comments here:
M. Moore is a hypocrite? Those who say so are the hypocrites.
Taxes are the problem? What drug are you on?
One letter to a Congressman will do no good? True enough, but Moore is talking about THOUSANDS of letters. (If that doesn't work, what would you propose? Guns?)
James
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Obama is just a shill for the NWO crowd
Posted by: Lese Majeste
» Bunk.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: 2007, Dude.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Thanks. I didn't realize the event took place in 2007.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: "what would you propose?"
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Green Party?? Like in 2000????
Posted by: james_allen
» RE: Green Party?? Like in 2000???? Yeah, probably.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Are you on board?
Posted by: james_allen
» RE: Are you on board?
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kick on Oct 23, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
5
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: DUCE THE MILITARY BUDGET
Posted by: bouyant
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Oct 23, 2009 6:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fairleft on Oct 23, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 23, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you're not going to buy stocks
Posted by: Joseph2
» Not well thought out argument
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Not well thought out argument
Posted by: Joseph2
» Well, then say what you mean
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Well, then say what you mean
Posted by: Joseph2
» Check the facts
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Check the facts
Posted by: Joseph2
» You can check the facts if you can use the internet
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Is this an advertisment?
Posted by: Joseph2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: amacd on Oct 23, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully the film would include some real video (not staged) of the only kind of “Fallout” that will help more than pay-cuts:
In the first Great Crash of 1929, and even before the Great Depression that ravaged the American working/middle-classes, the most memorable scenes were of financial manipulators jumping from windows.
Hopefully, Michael will be able to incorporate some real film --- if we are lucky --- from today’s second Great Crash and before the second Great Depression can totally devastate the public, of memorable scenes of Wall Street Looters, Hedge Fund Whores, and Private Equity Pirates, who caused this, being pushed out of windows.
Now that’s a film that would be both popular with everyone and an Oscar favorite.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: haroldmh on Oct 23, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they do not vote the interests of the middle class you know they vote for a “special interest” at your expense.
If you sometimes, even if you should but don’t, “get mad as hell” at Congress and “don’t want to take it anymore”, please help in making a change.
1. Copy and paste "My Voting Pledge", below, to your word processor. Substitute your
name, zip code and your Representative’s name in the “I am” and “To” positions.
A. Repeat twice more, once for each of your two Senators.
B. Google up the three names, go to their .gov home page for an address and mail each a hard copy; alternatively, use the “contact me” from their .gov home page to email it to them.
2. To increase the effectiveness of the message and your pledge we need to go viral.
A. Please forward this email to every person in your address book.
B. Ask them to pledge as you have.
C. Ask them to forward this email to every person in their address book, ad infinitum.
3. To measure our progress, when you have taken the pledge, please send a message showing your zip code as the subject to votemiddleclassdan@bellsouth.net .
Thanks for your help.
I am: Harold Hellickson
Zip Code 28739
MY VOTING PLEDGE
FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS
To: Representative Heath Shuler
Is This
If you vote 100 % for legislation favoring the middle class, I will vote for you in every primary and general election.
If you do not vote 100% for legislation favoring the middle class I will, if I can, depending upon state requirements, vote for an opponent to you in the next primary election.
If you nevertheless win the primary election, I will vote for your opposing major party opponent in the general election unless his or her national party has a lower “middle class voting score” than does your national party. In that event, I will vote for a third party candidate if one is available.
If no third party congressional candidate is available, I simply will not vote in the congressional election.
I will use as my scorecard of your voting record and that of your national party that which is determined by
www.themiddleclass.org .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Harold, great site and pledge --- but 'working-class'
Posted by: amacd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Oct 23, 2009 8:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My suggestion is that if it hasn't already been done by somebody else, a Social Democratic party should be formed as an antidote to the poison we have to endure under the corporate crooks and their lackeys in "government".
The Social in that name means exactly what it says, with a healthy dose of Socialism to gain us what we need and DESERVE, namely single-payer universal health care,and universal EDUCATION through college, and as a watchdog over the corporate thieves who've proven time and again that they're CRAZY with greed, and can't be trusted for a minute.
Who to head up such a party? Why, Michael Moore, of course.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Reinvent the Wheel?
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Geonomist on Oct 23, 2009 9:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Oct 23, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, you can take over your local party committee; the one in my town is extremely liberal. Even the state convention will pass very liberal platform items - but exactly nothing comes of it.
The truth is that the Democratic Party is controlled by big money - essentially the same big money that controls the Republican party. Their collusion to keep out people like you and me is blatant, and so is their steady joint march to the Right.
Given the efforts already put into trying to "take back" the DP and the results, we can conclude that they are exactly counterproductive: the harder progressives work, the farther the DP moves to the Right! That's because they become ever surer of your commitment to them, and because your own work shuts out genuinely progressive alternatives, which would have to be outside the Democratic Party. You and MM are feeding the beast! (Yes, I know, some of you caught on long ago - more power to you!)
The real power resides with the big money, so unless you can outbid Goldman Sachs and the rest of Wall Street, you're going to have to "grow a spine" and try a whole new tack that doesn't depend on sold-out power structures.
Some of us already started: www.gp.org.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zrants on Oct 23, 2009 9:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lclark on Oct 23, 2009 10:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the person who suggests reducing the military budget. Why do we have troops in Europe? WW2 ended prior to my birth.
Use all those troops to begin laying tracks to a electric train system for rapid trnasport if goods and people within the country, as well as deploying solar panels and wind turbines.
Break up food cartels that own the whole chain of production, purchase, and distribution of food so family farms can be profitable within the U.S. again.
Get out of trade treaties and insist basic industries a nation needs to remain non-dependent must be protected. Steel, concrete, machine tooling, generators, clothings, food, etc should be produced within the nation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Oct 23, 2009 10:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sherry on Oct 23, 2009 10:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of calling my no-good Republican Congressman (but I do use Health Justice free faxes to bug him constantly), I work tirelessly to replace him or put more progressive cadidates in office at all levels. If I lived elsewhere, I could volunteer to keep some of the good ones (Weiner, Ellison, Massa, etc.). I can't change the Republicans and certainly don't need more Blue Dog Dems, who are often the biggest obstacle. Most of the work that needs to be done requires talking to people where you live. The real work is going to demand some sacrifice (in 2008, I retired a year early making a significant financial decision to work full-time on a Congressional race --- and no, we didn't win this time).
If you can't find a campaign right now, feel free to help with ours --- I'm calling people this morning to donate to Greg Marrow's campaign for the House of Delegates in VA. Why not send us a donation? www.gregmarrow.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coolrayfruge on Oct 23, 2009 10:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is the problem with the world.
As long as it requires money to get things done.
Change for a better world will never happen.
We will not have Freedom and we won't have Liberty as long as we are dependent on money.
As long as we keep denying it
The the hardship we are having will always be there.
Until we reconize that MONEY is the problem.
It perverts our decision to do the right thing.
It fuels man greed and lust for power to control over others.
Power corrupts.
It devides the people and brings desention among the people by putting them into seperate classes.
It doesn't bring them together for the common good.
Instead it fuels hate,prejudice,envie.
Causing us to commit crimes against our fellow man.
enslaving them to sevatude to others.
No person should be a slave or servant to another.
We should be work together as equals for a common cause of making a better world for all of us to live in.
Not just a certain class.
The people are the answer. not money.
The planet provides us freely the resources we need,we have the manpower and technology.
There is no excuse.
I hope we have the wisdom to use it all wisely to solve our problems.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Money is noy the answer.
Posted by: Joseph2
» RE: Money is noy the answer.
Posted by: earthman
» RE: Money is not the answer.
Posted by: Joseph2
» NO....
Posted by: henderson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sherry on Oct 23, 2009 10:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Credit Unions
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Oct 23, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being independent voters we attend town and county council meetings and are involved in our community. We do homeschool, but if someone has a child in public school they need to be more involved and stop expecting teachers to do the job of the parent. And we take care of our elders. We don't warehouse them!! And we know our neighbors and help them weekly when they are out of work, sick or in need. This is the meaning of community! Washington D C is three thousand plus miles east of us. They are NOT our community.
My biggest gripe is people who talk and talk and talk about what other people should be doing, but when you look closer you see the talk is all talk on the part of the talker, and NO walk the talk. So do not listen to anyone who isn't walking their talk, because talk is cheap!! Actions are louder than words.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lynmarenjensen on Oct 23, 2009 10:55 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Second, we saw an effort by the progressive wing of the Democratic party to vote out a Republican-lite incumbent in Connecticut in 2006. Ned Lamont beat Joe Liberman in the primary. Then what happened? AIPAC and the other factions that control the party's leadership were so scared of losing Lieberman that instead of bowing out of the race gracefully, Lieberman ran as an independent. Progressive Democrats voted for Lamont, but Blue Dog Democrats and scores of Republicans voted for Lieberman. The result: We have an "independent" in the Senate who caucuses with the Democrats (who treat him like a rockstar) but who pulls stunts like siding with the Republicans to curtail civil liberties. I wonder how the Democratic voters of Connecticut feel now. We could see many versions of this story play out in 2010 if a significant number of progressives do challenge conservatives. It shows that the current Democratic party is more like two parties than one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rmforall on Oct 23, 2009 11:33 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is the same level of methanol from the 11% methanol part
of the aspartame molecule in 2 L [ 6 cans ] aspartame beverages,
as in 1 L dark wine or liquors.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/579335
Dermatitis. 2008; 19(3): E10-E11.
© 2008 American Contact Dermatitis Society
Formaldehyde, Aspartame, and Migraines:
A Possible Connection
Sharon E. Jacob; Sarah Stechschulte
Published: 09/17/2008
Abstract
Aspartame is a widely used artificial sweetener
that has been linked to pediatric and adolescent migraines.
Upon ingestion, aspartame is broken, converted, and oxidized
into formaldehyde in various tissues.
We present the first case series of aspartame-associated
migraines related to clinically relevant positive reactions
to formaldehyde on patch testing.
formaldehyde, aspartame, and migraines, the first case series,
Sharon E Jacob-Soo, Sarah A Stechschulte, UCSD,
Dermatitis 2008 May: Rich Murray 2008.07.18
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.htm
Friday, July 18, 2008
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/1553
consider co-factors (methanol, formaldehyde, and protective
folic acid), re UK FSA test of aspartame in candy bars on
50 reactors, Stephen L Atkin, Hull York Medical School:
Rich Murray 2009.09.29
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.htm
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/1587
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/messages
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: humanrevolution on Oct 23, 2009 12:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You talk about getting rid of old systems and ways of doing things but bloody revolution is one such old system. Human beings can solve problems without violence. You arrogantly tell people to read history but you pay no attention to it. Our country was created by a violent revolution against an oppressive government. Did that achieve utopia? No. But it definitely inspired one of the most violent societies in history. Your methods of solving a problem will always manifest in the outcome. If you use violence you will get more violence. The people in this country whether they are the wealthiest or the poorest are human beings. Some of them are ruled by greed, anger and stupidity but the point is while we must stand up to these things outside of us we must also realize the enemy is within. Unless we are all battling these things and tending to the weeds in our own gardens then we should not be surprised when those tendencies manifest in society. Children are not born evil and greedy they learn these things. And while I definitely respect Mr. Moore and his solutions (and they are great ones), I believe we must not just treat the symptoms but also the illness itself.
All human problems are created by humans, ergo the solution lies within. We have tried political, social, cultural and economic revolutions which have all left us far short of our goal. We need a human revolution…A transformation deep within the hearts of people. Some may dismiss that as idealistic or difficult but it is the only way to transform our world in a lasting way. I would add to Mr. Moore’s list that we need to transform the way our children are taught. Education is not about teaching someone skills to be employable but rather giving someone tools by which to live an inspired, sincere and compassionate life. We also need to start within. Those who rant about bloody revolution are not serious about change because that is a fantasy and will not solve our problems. Start with yourself and don’t doubt that your own transformation can change the world.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Watercolors on Oct 23, 2009 12:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further, let's stop bashing unions and recognize that unions work for everyone because when worker paychecks are equal for the same work, companies must compete on the basis of quality and service. That works for all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 23, 2009 12:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 23, 2009 1:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But anyway what is the International dialing code for the USA - I can't remember..
Its +44 for the UK, but then you have to omit the first 0 of the UK number
"Each of us must get into the daily habit of taking 5 minutes to make four brief calls: One to the President (202-456-1414)"
"Hello Barry - You need a New Team. You've employed a bunch of Fascist Cunts"
"Yes Tony - I Know - I'm Dealing With That"
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenferret on Oct 23, 2009 1:23 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, the Dems have a super-majority and they're not doing any of the things on your list. Why not add to that list: instant runoff voting, to eliminate the so-called 'spoiler effect' and allow us to vote our hopes, not our fears; proportional representation to expand the range of views represented in government; equal access to debates for all candidates, not just Democrats and Republicans; and reform of ballot access laws meant to keep citizens from participating in the political process?
Mike, I'm not asking you to register Green. Just stop acting like Greens don't exist, and acknowledge that there are other routes to change than the Democratic Party. Peace!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mike, stop acting like the Green Party doesn't exist
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» I don't get why you think anyone has to do this for your party, one that opposes us and would like
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 23, 2009 2:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice. I lost mine already. IMO, anyone who had a subprime oughta be spared the shit...seein' how subprimes were schemes and immoral to begin with. Same as the housing prices.
Don' much matter no mo'... it's all shit and we know we're on our own. Always were down here in the lower classes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Contessa1201 on Oct 23, 2009 3:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You say start your own media. I have done just that. I used to write letters and letters to all sorts of people and my voice was never heard. It was just like hitting delete instead of send. I got no return whatsoever from my many efforts to express my views on things and be heard by SOMEBODY.
I decided to write a book and get it all out there--and I followed George Bernard Shaw's maxim of "If you're going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh or they'll kill you."
I wrote my book. It is called VIVA LA EVOLUCION. Of course I couldn't get to first base with an agent because they are scared to take a chance. They only want guaranteed slot machines that pay off. Then nearly all the New York publishers (Macmillian, Scrivners, Knopf, Random House, St. Martin's Press, you name it, most all of them) are owned by two big German publishing outfits. An unknown, little person with these corporate guys plays like a joke.
So, thank goodness, there is Print On Demand publishing these days that will print a person’s work and put it on amazon.com, give it an ISBN number, and in the process not charge you an arm and a leg. Granted they publish everything and so a lot of it is not good, but it is giving people a forum that they would ordinarily not have.
I am one of those people. My book is coming out in about two weeks under the LULU imprint (lulu.com). I am not a novice writer and I think my book is a good one. I just did not have the years it takes to get it before the right people's eyes. If you don’t have the golden-handshake with that crowd in New York, they’re not going to give you even the recognition that indeed you are alive and a human person. You are a thing, a little person, a nobody. We don’t know you!
What is lacking in the USA is we need to get rid of the golden handshake. We the many are out here trying to make ourselves heard and make good things happen for the many instead of the few. We must yell like hell to make ourselves heard. I'm trying to do it with a book. Without some means of being heard, the fat-cat, golden-handshake people are never going to listen to us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsound on Oct 23, 2009 4:25 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've come to the conclusion that Canada is what it is thanks to 4 major political parties, 15 minority parties and about 20 more newer parties.
America is too much about left vs. right . . . and that's it . . . no middle ground, no alternative. The "You're either with us or against us" mentality has to go. Period.
Whatever it takes to create at least ONE MAJOR alternative party is paramount to the survival of American Democracy. (A few more couldn't hurt)
Hey Michael . . . . start a new political party. You certainly have the means . . . the money . . . . the influence . . . . the resources . . . . the following. Your next movie should be about that . . . then you'll have the momentum to make it happen. But please, don't run for office . . . we need you to keep doing what you're doing.
just and idea . . . .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Oct 23, 2009 7:57 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for the first idea, don't evict, this is silly. All it does is perpetuate the idea that everyone should own a home. It would also make everyone who's paying for their homes now wonder why they should continue; if the government is going to force banks to reduce mortgage payments for those who have lost jobs, why not also for those who still have jobs, but whose homes are worth much less than before?
The idea about common ownership of natural resources is not necessarily a good one. The "public" is no more likely to be responsible stewards of natural resources than Capitalism was, or Communism, or any other -ism, for that matter.
One idea that should be injected is to demand a 50% reduction across-the-board reduction in all Federal government pay scales. Right now, government workers tend to make twice what people working in private businesses make. This is exorbitant, as bad as the banksters. So, we need to reduce pay by at least 50% for all governmentsters.
Then we need to have one "pension" system for all people, in or out of government, with no double and triple dipping--and still complaining, and there's a lot of double dipping and triple dipping, collecting social security, collecting a government pension, plus working as a "consultant," or collecting disability checks and still working full time.
Then we need to withdraw the right to patents for all pharmaceuticals, shut down and hand out capital punishment to any pharmaceutical that peddles a toxic "medicine."
Then we need a Constitutional Convention.
Then we need to bring ALL the troops home and close down the hundreds of oversea bases, particularly the covert, secret, publicly unknown ones.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Birdland on Oct 24, 2009 9:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tokerdesigner on Oct 24, 2009 1:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example, in California, Texas and elsewhere there are trillions of dead sticks which need to be picked up and clipped off and removed from drought-ridden areas to head off more billion-dollar fires. After the best branches are logged and hauled to urban centers for use in carpentry and manufacturing, shreddings and bundled brush can be parked in gullies and revines to trap rainwater leading to gradual reforestation. This program could be placed under the administration of former President G. W. Bush and named "Bushwater".
Perhaps a partnership can be arrived at where the government pays a low but honorable wage to such workers, with a place to stay and some assistance with meals, medical staffing, day-care, language-learning, access to innanet and whatever else is needed, along with the vital aid to the homeowner meeting payments.
A logical training aspect would be for everyone to learn some rudimentary carpentry so that structures can be erected in the house such as shelving units to store everyone's stuff and "mezzanines" or sleeping-lofts so that someone can sleep in a room even while the floor area remains available for working at a desk etc. In this way the occupancy of a 1500-sq.-ft. house can reach ten easily without conflict or crowding. This program can be merged with Habitat for Humanity under the leadership of Jimmy Carpenter.
If national governments can cooperate, maybe families in the US can cooperate with families in Australia, Brazil, Chile etc. so that while a skeleton staff remains in each house in the winter months, the majority of members of two families reside and work in the summer country (i.e. from October through March in the southern hemisphere etc.). This program could be named Hemigration.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lizzyfrompa on Oct 24, 2009 7:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 24, 2009 9:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May justice prevail for all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kewpie on Oct 25, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get health care insurance in my state for the poor and uninsured! What is cool about the plan is that it partners with an HMO that is local in the county where you live. I had four to choose from and I called the call center about my choices. I spoke with someone who understood the state plan and was able to make an intelligent decision.
My thought is that the federal money for the health care should go to each state to develop a plan for their population. It gets broken down even more to the local level. The recipient of Badger Care pays a co-pay and a low yearly amount. The insurance seems to work, it is not perfect, because we do not have dental or vision on the plan. Otherwise I am happy with it!
I know other states have insurance for the poor and uninsured. Why can the government look at these states for what works and what does not? Why not give each state funding to monitor and run their own health care?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kikiriki on Oct 25, 2009 10:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The list is good but not good enough! In my opinion, the fact of the matter is, the system is broken calling and demanding doesn't do anything. They will do what they want because they can and besides you aren't invited to their party.
We've been living in the 1800 for a long time. We can't continue to live like this. Think about it! We don't have anything to loose we don't have anything! The Government, corporate America don't even give us the BASICS, even when we are demanding them, even when we vote for them.
We can't wait any longer for change. Are we just waiting for them to die???? because then their kids will take over and they are probably worst. One example is the Bush Family. I can just see it, I can just imagine Bush's daughters in Washington trying to fulfill daddy's dreams u know kill me know and just think and be sure there's more, where that scum came from plenty of it..
I took Michael's list and shrunk it to 4 things we all can do to change the US. ultimetly the world because changing the US unfortunetly also would save the world FROM EVIL...that is right America is EVIL and you are too because u have allowed ur country to kill of everything and then u go to church.
Here is the countdown, if you really want to save the world from Evil and Ultimetly change our way of living then u should join.
4. Take the money out of your bank even if it didn't get bailout money. You most wonder what they stole from you that they didn't need the $.
3.Drop all credit cards even the ones you pay end of month Master card American Express they are both also part of the problem, don't be silly.
2. Loose your stocks,You invest you provide power to the wrong individuals. If you have to invest them make sure you arenn't investing in corporate that is going to come back to hunt u or ur neightbor.
1. GO EXEMPT from your federal taxes. AND DON'T PAY UR federal TAXES AT THE END OF THE YEAR IS THAT SIMPLE! Pay ur State taxes so your community doesn't suffer. If most of us did it at the end of year they will get the picture. Trust me nice and clear and all from the comfort of your home, no tear gas no beatings etc. I'm not saying take a vacation with that money even though is temting.. is leverage meaning THE POWER TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING; AN strategic advantage!
No one ever said a war or a revolutions were easy. by now we have nothig to loose no jobs no insurance. What bothers me most is that we are so conformist and we allow a group to do horrible things not just to us but to others around the world and we turn a BLIND EYE IS THE TRUTH and I'm really ashamed to be an American. I want to prove to the rest of world that Americans aren't stupit, we are good people we mean well and that we aren't killers we just don't know any better because we are so far away from the rest of the world. That's SAD!
Kikiriki
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sanford on Oct 28, 2009 11:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Nov 12, 2009 8:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found the conclusions out about page 160 to be most interesting. By every good measure the United States is in 30th place when rating quality of life. This should be required reading for all true patriots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: seksi on Oct 22, 2009 11:00 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are not on facebook you can help by staying informed - do a google news search for the phrase "Weiner amendment" every single day until the floor debate begins...
Your searches are measurable, and as the interest in this builds, the media will respond with better coverage of this story.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wrinklemomma on Oct 22, 2009 6:22 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sullidave on Oct 23, 2009 1:04 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you really want things to change, why don't you lead by example. Give your money to the poor.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: He is leading by example, he makes movies
Posted by: Sister_Lauren
» RE: Hey Mike, put your money where your mouth is.
Posted by: Brb007
» Dismantle Goldman Sachs
Posted by: weathered
» Hey sullidave we're all broke here, show a little grace and dignity.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Hey sullidave, Do the math.
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Hey sullidave, Do the math.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: Hey sullidave, Do the math.
Posted by: Crazy H
» Preparation H says, "1 + 1 = 6". Doh!
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Billie Boi's daily off topic personal attack...
Posted by: Crazy H
» Yeah, irony is never lost on you, is it, hypocrite? Or was that nut-bar?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Yo Preparation H, what's this, jerkoff?
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: Yo Preparation H, what's this, jerkoff?
Posted by: Birdland
» Bite me, bird-brain.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» Shooting the messenger
Posted by: Karlh
» Hey, sullidave, have you led by example?
Posted by: Beck
» RE: Hey Mike, put your money where your mouth is.
Posted by: hourglass
» RE: Hey Mike, put your money where your mouth is.
Posted by: EJLima
Comments are closed-
Posted by: overseas on Oct 23, 2009 1:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Little House is all about Hollywood's love affair with banks. We're all in Walnut Grove now.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy on Oct 23, 2009 2:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
FREE AMERICA
REVOLUTIONARY (DIRECT) DEMOCRACY
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Revolutionary (Direct) Democracy
Posted by: DavidMac
» RE: Direct Democracy
Posted by: Crazy H
» "Pure Democracy"??? "Pure Democracy" is Orwellian doublethink for Mob Rule.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: "Pure Democracy"??? "Pure Democracy" is Orwellian doublethink for Mob Rule.
Posted by: truth+equality
» RE: Leverage
Posted by: kikiriki
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Suzon on Oct 23, 2009 3:59 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The relationships between inequality and the prevalence of health and social problems...suggest that if the United States was to reduce its income equality to something like the average of the four most equal of the rich countries (Japan, Norway, Sweden and Finland), the proportion of the population feeling that they could trust others might rise by 75 per cent--presumably with matching improvements in the quality of community life; rates of mental illness and obesity might similarly each be cut by almost two-thirds, teenage birth rates could be more than halved, prison populations might be reduced by 75 per cent, and people could live longer while working the equivalent of two months less per year.
Now who can argue against that?
Thanks, Michael Moore--once again!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: remember the saying, "Lead, follow or get out of the way" when you contact your reps
Posted by: jrgjniew
» "May" is a better choice it implies a conditional state that is intolerable.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lese Majeste on Oct 23, 2009 4:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recall that they were getting deluged with phone calls, emails, faxes and letters running 8 or 9 to 1 AGAINST that bill?
What did Congress do? They told We the People to shove it and passed the damned thing.
We're way past the point of sending letters or making calls to our Congress, they don't give a damn what us serfs think, they only seek to keep happy Wall Street, the Pentagon and Israel.
Back in 1789, the French got tired of seeing the wealthy elite living like pigs on their labor while the average family was starving to death and living in hovels while the upper crust were living in castles.
Their solution was a bit messy, but it damn sure got the King's attention.
And that's what we're dealing with; American royalty by right of money and power.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Yes, it got the king's attention but only briefly, he was beheaded.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: jrgjniew
» You astutely mention the most vexing issue facing America: nudity at the beach.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: You astutely mention the most vexing issue facing America: nudity at the beach.
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
» RE: "...and look at France now..."
Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: FAITHCARR
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: Crazy H
» Rep. Ron Kind listens to lobbyists, not people
Posted by: wiscorad
» RE: Calling and Writing Congress no longer works 'Mikey'
Posted by: earthman
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jrgjniew on Oct 23, 2009 4:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2. Unionize? That, for the most part, is also a waste of money. Internal corruption and politics is worse inside unions than out. They constantly extort all they can from the companies, instead of what is "right" or "fair". ref GM, Ford, etc. (just think what a car would cost, and how many more of us could afford them, if those workers made $15/hr, like most of us, instead of the $70+ they were reportedly getting). The members pay dues to support the laziness and lavish lifestyles of the union bosses. Their goal is to make the members happy by pushing for more pay and more perks for less work. Also, they want as many new positions created(job shop) to get more members and dues, regardless of how inefficient this makes a company. small companies, like you would think Moore would support, cannot afford to pay someone only to run a forklift for instance, when you only need a forklift for 1 hr/day.(This also happened in a 6 employee company near us---it folded. The employees told the union they were happy and not to force this---but the union told them---you are part of our union, this is how we do it, you will too. They are now jobless). In reality, they just make products more expensive for those of us that are non-inion. If everyone had all those benefits and pay, then their would be no advantage to joining the union---everything would just be higher priced.
3. Worker owned companies can work, but a couple near us collapsed for very obvious reasons--the owners took care of themselves at the expense of non-owner employees, and at expense of the company itself. As owners, they were not held accountable for their responsivbilities, etc. Simply imploded. People are still people. No bank, including a community bank or credit union, can support a business that cannot show positive cash flow. "Oh, I see, you cna't pay your loan, which is really other members of our community's money, because you are paying yourself 3x what the average person is making, you don't feel, as an owner, that you need to show up to work on a regular basis toperform your duties, but we should loan your company more money to keep going...." NOT
4. Moore is a hypocrit. He is profiting from the dollars the poor pay to see his movies. Perhaps if he made these movies with his own money, then gave them to movie theaters for free, with the caveat that they had to show them for free, would he be credible. Of course he can't do this--but how about $1? He critcizes the company execs, and in some cases rightly so---noone is worth those kind of dollars, but lets put things in perspective.....A large company exec making $1-10mil/year vs. a movy starlet making that much or more for 1 movie! The exec is a job slave to that co. The starlet--move on to make more movies. Has he criticized his own industry??? Let's call a spade a spade.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Moore is not rich, he is just able to pay his bills. Control your jealousy.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Bad Unions! Bad! Bad!
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: voodoo economics
Posted by: paulaH
» RE: "...the owners took care of themselves ..."
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: morgan1 on Oct 23, 2009 4:18 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We will take back our country county by county, city by city and finally state by state until the federal govt. doesn't matter or it is our once more: And better.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Perhaps the form letter response addressed your formed writing.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: morgan1
Posted by: wtfo
» INHOFE, COBURN, AND COLE ARE MY WASHINGTON DELEGATION. LISTENING IS NOT THEIR FORTE. WHAT WOULD
Posted by: Raymond Emerson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Farasien on Oct 23, 2009 4:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reality is we live in an oligarchy. The corporations (and us, but do so at a WAY lower rate), through lobbyists pay the politicians and give them a future 'speaking tour' career once they tire of raping us all while in office. Until we can outlaw lobbies- really outlaw them, not just make them blaze', as is the current trend, we will NOT be listened to. Scream all you want, say whatever you want on any TV or radio show, call whomever you like, write your 'elected' officials a ream of letters and a gigabyte of emails every day of the week if you want, but it all goes in the trash, the recycle bin on the desktop or gets routed to a drone whose job it is to politely ignore what you are saying. Unless your complaint letter has a (minimum) $10,000 check paperclipped to it, nobody hears you. In situations like this, the only thing that can fix the system is to start hanging people and then rewrite the law repealing corporate personhood and outlawing lobbies. Until we do that, all we're doing is screaming at the choir. It feels cathartic to do so, but no real action begins until blood preceeds it.
Don't believe me? Go read some history. Tyranny and corruption are only expelled by burning it out- not politely accepting it and turning a blind eye to the truth.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» The Disco Inferno - "burn, baby, burn." I think we're too late for this.
Posted by: grindermonkey
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AJR Journal on Oct 23, 2009 4:52 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's next for him? Maybe a Nobel Prize?
He is a hypocritical entertainer, a capitalist wolf in socialist sheep's clothing.
He could use a personal trainer and a image stylist, too. He always looks like sh*t.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Is this a "5-year Plan"? Or a "Great Leap Fowrd"?
Posted by: fred_53_99
» RE: Is this a "5-year Plan"? Or a "Great Leap Fowrd"?
Posted by: dogtor
» RE: Is this a "5-year Plan"? Or a "Great Leap Fowrd"?
Posted by: dogtor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Erin on Oct 23, 2009 5:08 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Calling is a joke
Posted by: dogtor
Comments are closed-
Posted by: m/r on Oct 23, 2009 5:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the 'oligarchy' statement- and the fact that some basic issues need changing, ie the the idea that corps. are recognized as persons. Our daughter spent 4 weeks in Stockholm- she said she would prefer to raise her kids there. I have spent time in Europe;no, it is not paradise...however it is Civilized. We had our civil war, now do we need to be bombed out of our homes to get to our very own "Marshall Plan" ? No. I think we can skip that part and move to Reconstruction via our already in place republican/democratic process. Naysayers, as exemplified here with observations of M Moores'lack of "style" are a waste of time. ... continued...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: 2 cents / clarification
Posted by: m/r
» RE: 2 cents
Posted by: wtfo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 23, 2009 5:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They have looted our national treasure.
They have abandoned their constituency in favor of a multi-national corporate behemoth and an out-of-control military industrial complex.
They have created a global, geo-political catastrophe in the Middle East that will take at least a century to remedy.
They have shoveled a generation of American children into an untenable slaughterhouse in Iraq.
They have engendered an economic nightmare so immense that generations yet unborn will still be bearing its burden.
They have sold our nation's soul to the highest corporate bidder.
They have made a mockery of the First Amendment.
They have squandered a trillio-plus dollar surplus with a tax cut for a class of people who didn't need it.
They have gutted vital social programs that aid the poor and the elderly which have been in place for over seventy years.
They have gutted laws meant to protect working men and women.
They have plundered the environment.
They have depleted our educational system.
They have hijacked this nation's political dialogue.
They have ruined our international reputation.
They have handed our domestic agenda over to religious fanatics.
They have stolen two national elections.
They have trampled on our constitution.
They have sent our Bill of Rights through the sausage grinder....
They must never, ever be allowed to govern our country again.
The grand old party is over.
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Erin
» Bury them as deep as possible, Tom, the next time we need them will be for fossile fuel.
Posted by: grindermonkey
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: baldo
» Correction....
Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Correction....
Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Birdland
» RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN...
Posted by: farmer's daughter
» RE: Number 17: STOP VOTING DEMOCRAT
Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: Number 18: VOTE WITH YOUR HEART AND MIND INSTEAD OF BY PARTY.
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield
» Terrytom RE: Number 16: STOP VOTING REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Terrytom
» RE: Number 19: Vote based upon your own observations and experience and never, ever
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: m/r on Oct 23, 2009 5:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do you think Obama received the majority of the popular vote? WE did it! In our P J's.
No guns, no marches, no flag waving.
WE control the media by our google searches as mentioned in the first post. Just keep hitting that 'search' button. CNN, et al pick it up immediately- people like us are busy being paid to track. You know that! We all know this.
Let's use it. We cannot wait. Let's try it now for a public plan for health care. Every action needs the frontline. WE are the frontline! We have already demanded and are receiving Fairness on overpaid bank execs. In my 60+ years- this is the first time the gov't has put the brakes on EXCESS and GREED! It Can be done. Keep on truckin', I say- send those e mails, letters, make the phone calls. Wallpaper your bathroom with the form letters that come in response- and...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: texasdav on Oct 23, 2009 5:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If 10% of the population with participate in a vote-out-the-incumbent drive we could change everything. Campaign finance reform and term limits would go a long way toward fixing the problem but the corporations are the ones writing legislation so it will never happen.
We can change this country with our votes. Don't consider their political party affiliation. The Dems and the Repubs are one and the same "corporate" party. If we throw out every incumbent during the next election you can bet the rest of the worthless bunch will sit up and take notice. (Especially those veteran politicians with multiple terms.)
Spread the word on every blog.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Get rid of incumbents
Posted by: Erin
» RE: Get rid of incumbents
Posted by: Kate55
» No Dems or Repubs, only the 'Corporate War Party'
Posted by: Lese Majeste
» RE: Get rid of incumbents not going to happen via third party
Posted by: mikebppa
» RE: Get rid of incumbents not going to happen via third party
Posted by: cplot
» RE: Get rid of incumbents not going to happen via third party
Posted by: mikebppa
Comments are closed-
Posted by: m/r on Oct 23, 2009 5:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"afraid" of this administration and it's actions- I say "AMERICA- LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT"
F*#ch. That's what we heard in the '60's whenever we walked in a line for the Table Grape boycott for migrant workers- for civil rights, for women's rights. We,The People Have the Power- and it is easier than ever to
Participate. I have not seen Moore's movie and likely will not pay movie prices to see it. I don't need to. We "saw" this movie when 4 kids were shot down in Ohio by our own military. When I watched as a young woman had her legs beaten in Chicago in '68. I would not wish any of that on anyone- but I do wish anyone reading this will ACT. Thank you.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Crazy H on Oct 23, 2009 6:10 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, free money - Citibank in particular is an odious institution. They got us into this mess, let them finance our recovery.
Now that I'm employed again - I'm making minimum payments. I've got a year ... and when it's over, I can pick up another "zero interest on balance transfers" card.
(uhh, word to the unwise: don't try floating a bigger & bigger debt. You *do* have to pay it off eventually.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beck on Oct 23, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just thought I'd get all of that out of the way for some of you, and let you proceed instantly to other cynicism.
Any time any person or group affected big change, there were plenty of moments when things looked hopeless. Probably if you could all up all the emotional reactions by the activists during the time of striving you'd see more hopeless, wondering-if-it's-all-futile plugging away than moments of "woohoo! Victory is just around the corner!" Hindsight is not 20/20, it's delusional when looking at activist movements. None of those involved knew if failure was about to crash down. The historical moments of victory we see looking back were not inevitable in the minds of those trying. What they thought was that you keep trying for what is right, and you do it whether or not it seems to be working. You do it as long as it takes. If your elected officials seem to ignore you, why aren't you nailing them for that? Writing LTEs? Making it a campaign issue when they run for reelection?
Thank god Michael Moore doesn't think the way so many here do. If he did, he'd never have made a single movie. He would only have made movies if they fairly quickly accomplished the goal addressed in the film. But no one much thinks he's ineffective because that didn't happen, right?
You're all right, YOUR single phone call doesn't affect too much. It's yours combined with mine and everyone else's that do matter. If you look at single instances when it didn't work, you're probably giving in in a way that makes the evildoers very, very happy. They want you silent. They want you to never tell your congressmen anything.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: daw13 on Oct 23, 2009 6:41 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
BUILD ORGANIZATION
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: james_allen on Oct 23, 2009 6:40 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My only comment to Alternetters would be: Go a little easier on Barack Obama, who may be doing as good a job as possible! The credit crisis did not have easy solutions. The U.S. President is not a dictator but must cope with Congress and opinion-makers who are definitely NOT liberal.
I was amazed when I confirmed, on the websites of authentic liberal organizations, that Obama did indeed have "the most liberal voting record" of any Senator in 2007. I consider Obama to be an intelligent and good-spirited centrist, rather than a liberal; that 99 other Senators were to his right seemed shocking ... and more than a little sad.
I must say I was amazed -- and saddened -- by some of the other comments here:
M. Moore is a hypocrite? Those who say so are the hypocrites.
Taxes are the problem? What drug are you on?
One letter to a Congressman will do no good? True enough, but Moore is talking about THOUSANDS of letters. (If that doesn't work, what would you propose? Guns?)
James
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Obama is just a shill for the NWO crowd
Posted by: Lese Majeste
» Bunk.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: 2007, Dude.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Thanks. I didn't realize the event took place in 2007.
Posted by: GuitarBill
» RE: "what would you propose?"
Posted by: oregoncharles
» Green Party?? Like in 2000????
Posted by: james_allen
» RE: Green Party?? Like in 2000???? Yeah, probably.
Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Are you on board?
Posted by: james_allen
» RE: Are you on board?
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kick on Oct 23, 2009 6:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
5
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: DUCE THE MILITARY BUDGET
Posted by: bouyant
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Oct 23, 2009 6:59 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fairleft on Oct 23, 2009 7:39 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 23, 2009 7:41 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If you're not going to buy stocks
Posted by: Joseph2
» Not well thought out argument
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Not well thought out argument
Posted by: Joseph2
» Well, then say what you mean
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Well, then say what you mean
Posted by: Joseph2
» Check the facts
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Check the facts
Posted by: Joseph2
» You can check the facts if you can use the internet
Posted by: ReallyBearish
» Is this an advertisment?
Posted by: Joseph2
Comments are closed-
Posted by: amacd on Oct 23, 2009 8:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hopefully the film would include some real video (not staged) of the only kind of “Fallout” that will help more than pay-cuts:
In the first Great Crash of 1929, and even before the Great Depression that ravaged the American working/middle-classes, the most memorable scenes were of financial manipulators jumping from windows.
Hopefully, Michael will be able to incorporate some real film --- if we are lucky --- from today’s second Great Crash and before the second Great Depression can totally devastate the public, of memorable scenes of Wall Street Looters, Hedge Fund Whores, and Private Equity Pirates, who caused this, being pushed out of windows.
Now that’s a film that would be both popular with everyone and an Oscar favorite.
Alan MacDonald
Sanford, Maine
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: haroldmh on Oct 23, 2009 8:49 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When they do not vote the interests of the middle class you know they vote for a “special interest” at your expense.
If you sometimes, even if you should but don’t, “get mad as hell” at Congress and “don’t want to take it anymore”, please help in making a change.
1. Copy and paste "My Voting Pledge", below, to your word processor. Substitute your
name, zip code and your Representative’s name in the “I am” and “To” positions.
A. Repeat twice more, once for each of your two Senators.
B. Google up the three names, go to their .gov home page for an address and mail each a hard copy; alternatively, use the “contact me” from their .gov home page to email it to them.
2. To increase the effectiveness of the message and your pledge we need to go viral.
A. Please forward this email to every person in your address book.
B. Ask them to pledge as you have.
C. Ask them to forward this email to every person in their address book, ad infinitum.
3. To measure our progress, when you have taken the pledge, please send a message showing your zip code as the subject to votemiddleclassdan@bellsouth.net .
Thanks for your help.
I am: Harold Hellickson
Zip Code 28739
MY VOTING PLEDGE
FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS
To: Representative Heath Shuler
Is This
If you vote 100 % for legislation favoring the middle class, I will vote for you in every primary and general election.
If you do not vote 100% for legislation favoring the middle class I will, if I can, depending upon state requirements, vote for an opponent to you in the next primary election.
If you nevertheless win the primary election, I will vote for your opposing major party opponent in the general election unless his or her national party has a lower “middle class voting score” than does your national party. In that event, I will vote for a third party candidate if one is available.
If no third party congressional candidate is available, I simply will not vote in the congressional election.
I will use as my scorecard of your voting record and that of your national party that which is determined by
www.themiddleclass.org .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Harold, great site and pledge --- but 'working-class'
Posted by: amacd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Oct 23, 2009 8:57 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My suggestion is that if it hasn't already been done by somebody else, a Social Democratic party should be formed as an antidote to the poison we have to endure under the corporate crooks and their lackeys in "government".
The Social in that name means exactly what it says, with a healthy dose of Socialism to gain us what we need and DESERVE, namely single-payer universal health care,and universal EDUCATION through college, and as a watchdog over the corporate thieves who've proven time and again that they're CRAZY with greed, and can't be trusted for a minute.
Who to head up such a party? Why, Michael Moore, of course.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Why Reinvent the Wheel?
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Geonomist on Oct 23, 2009 9:42 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oregoncharles on Oct 23, 2009 9:43 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, you can take over your local party committee; the one in my town is extremely liberal. Even the state convention will pass very liberal platform items - but exactly nothing comes of it.
The truth is that the Democratic Party is controlled by big money - essentially the same big money that controls the Republican party. Their collusion to keep out people like you and me is blatant, and so is their steady joint march to the Right.
Given the efforts already put into trying to "take back" the DP and the results, we can conclude that they are exactly counterproductive: the harder progressives work, the farther the DP moves to the Right! That's because they become ever surer of your commitment to them, and because your own work shuts out genuinely progressive alternatives, which would have to be outside the Democratic Party. You and MM are feeding the beast! (Yes, I know, some of you caught on long ago - more power to you!)
The real power resides with the big money, so unless you can outbid Goldman Sachs and the rest of Wall Street, you're going to have to "grow a spine" and try a whole new tack that doesn't depend on sold-out power structures.
Some of us already started: www.gp.org.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: zrants on Oct 23, 2009 9:54 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lclark on Oct 23, 2009 10:21 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the person who suggests reducing the military budget. Why do we have troops in Europe? WW2 ended prior to my birth.
Use all those troops to begin laying tracks to a electric train system for rapid trnasport if goods and people within the country, as well as deploying solar panels and wind turbines.
Break up food cartels that own the whole chain of production, purchase, and distribution of food so family farms can be profitable within the U.S. again.
Get out of trade treaties and insist basic industries a nation needs to remain non-dependent must be protected. Steel, concrete, machine tooling, generators, clothings, food, etc should be produced within the nation.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cori on Oct 23, 2009 10:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sherry on Oct 23, 2009 10:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of calling my no-good Republican Congressman (but I do use Health Justice free faxes to bug him constantly), I work tirelessly to replace him or put more progressive cadidates in office at all levels. If I lived elsewhere, I could volunteer to keep some of the good ones (Weiner, Ellison, Massa, etc.). I can't change the Republicans and certainly don't need more Blue Dog Dems, who are often the biggest obstacle. Most of the work that needs to be done requires talking to people where you live. The real work is going to demand some sacrifice (in 2008, I retired a year early making a significant financial decision to work full-time on a Congressional race --- and no, we didn't win this time).
If you can't find a campaign right now, feel free to help with ours --- I'm calling people this morning to donate to Greg Marrow's campaign for the House of Delegates in VA. Why not send us a donation? www.gregmarrow.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: coolrayfruge on Oct 23, 2009 10:49 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is the problem with the world.
As long as it requires money to get things done.
Change for a better world will never happen.
We will not have Freedom and we won't have Liberty as long as we are dependent on money.
As long as we keep denying it
The the hardship we are having will always be there.
Until we reconize that MONEY is the problem.
It perverts our decision to do the right thing.
It fuels man greed and lust for power to control over others.
Power corrupts.
It devides the people and brings desention among the people by putting them into seperate classes.
It doesn't bring them together for the common good.
Instead it fuels hate,prejudice,envie.
Causing us to commit crimes against our fellow man.
enslaving them to sevatude to others.
No person should be a slave or servant to another.
We should be work together as equals for a common cause of making a better world for all of us to live in.
Not just a certain class.
The people are the answer. not money.
The planet provides us freely the resources we need,we have the manpower and technology.
There is no excuse.
I hope we have the wisdom to use it all wisely to solve our problems.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Money is noy the answer.
Posted by: Joseph2
» RE: Money is noy the answer.
Posted by: earthman
» RE: Money is not the answer.
Posted by: Joseph2
» NO....
Posted by: henderson
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sherry on Oct 23, 2009 10:49 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Credit Unions
Posted by: oregoncharles
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MotherLodeBeth on Oct 23, 2009 10:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being independent voters we attend town and county council meetings and are involved in our community. We do homeschool, but if someone has a child in public school they need to be more involved and stop expecting teachers to do the job of the parent. And we take care of our elders. We don't warehouse them!! And we know our neighbors and help them weekly when they are out of work, sick or in need. This is the meaning of community! Washington D C is three thousand plus miles east of us. They are NOT our community.
My biggest gripe is people who talk and talk and talk about what other people should be doing, but when you look closer you see the talk is all talk on the part of the talker, and NO walk the talk. So do not listen to anyone who isn't walking their talk, because talk is cheap!! Actions are louder than words.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lynmarenjensen on Oct 23, 2009 10:55 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Second, we saw an effort by the progressive wing of the Democratic party to vote out a Republican-lite incumbent in Connecticut in 2006. Ned Lamont beat Joe Liberman in the primary. Then what happened? AIPAC and the other factions that control the party's leadership were so scared of losing Lieberman that instead of bowing out of the race gracefully, Lieberman ran as an independent. Progressive Democrats voted for Lamont, but Blue Dog Democrats and scores of Republicans voted for Lieberman. The result: We have an "independent" in the Senate who caucuses with the Democrats (who treat him like a rockstar) but who pulls stunts like siding with the Republicans to curtail civil liberties. I wonder how the Democratic voters of Connecticut feel now. We could see many versions of this story play out in 2010 if a significant number of progressives do challenge conservatives. It shows that the current Democratic party is more like two parties than one.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rmforall on Oct 23, 2009 11:33 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is the same level of methanol from the 11% methanol part
of the aspartame molecule in 2 L [ 6 cans ] aspartame beverages,
as in 1 L dark wine or liquors.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/579335
Dermatitis. 2008; 19(3): E10-E11.
© 2008 American Contact Dermatitis Society
Formaldehyde, Aspartame, and Migraines:
A Possible Connection
Sharon E. Jacob; Sarah Stechschulte
Published: 09/17/2008
Abstract
Aspartame is a widely used artificial sweetener
that has been linked to pediatric and adolescent migraines.
Upon ingestion, aspartame is broken, converted, and oxidized
into formaldehyde in various tissues.
We present the first case series of aspartame-associated
migraines related to clinically relevant positive reactions
to formaldehyde on patch testing.
formaldehyde, aspartame, and migraines, the first case series,
Sharon E Jacob-Soo, Sarah A Stechschulte, UCSD,
Dermatitis 2008 May: Rich Murray 2008.07.18
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2008_07_01_archive.htm
Friday, July 18, 2008
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/1553
consider co-factors (methanol, formaldehyde, and protective
folic acid), re UK FSA test of aspartame in candy bars on
50 reactors, Stephen L Atkin, Hull York Medical School:
Rich Murray 2009.09.29
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.htm
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/message/1587
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/aspartameNM/messages
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: humanrevolution on Oct 23, 2009 12:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You talk about getting rid of old systems and ways of doing things but bloody revolution is one such old system. Human beings can solve problems without violence. You arrogantly tell people to read history but you pay no attention to it. Our country was created by a violent revolution against an oppressive government. Did that achieve utopia? No. But it definitely inspired one of the most violent societies in history. Your methods of solving a problem will always manifest in the outcome. If you use violence you will get more violence. The people in this country whether they are the wealthiest or the poorest are human beings. Some of them are ruled by greed, anger and stupidity but the point is while we must stand up to these things outside of us we must also realize the enemy is within. Unless we are all battling these things and tending to the weeds in our own gardens then we should not be surprised when those tendencies manifest in society. Children are not born evil and greedy they learn these things. And while I definitely respect Mr. Moore and his solutions (and they are great ones), I believe we must not just treat the symptoms but also the illness itself.
All human problems are created by humans, ergo the solution lies within. We have tried political, social, cultural and economic revolutions which have all left us far short of our goal. We need a human revolution…A transformation deep within the hearts of people. Some may dismiss that as idealistic or difficult but it is the only way to transform our world in a lasting way. I would add to Mr. Moore’s list that we need to transform the way our children are taught. Education is not about teaching someone skills to be employable but rather giving someone tools by which to live an inspired, sincere and compassionate life. We also need to start within. Those who rant about bloody revolution are not serious about change because that is a fantasy and will not solve our problems. Start with yourself and don’t doubt that your own transformation can change the world.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Watercolors on Oct 23, 2009 12:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Further, let's stop bashing unions and recognize that unions work for everyone because when worker paychecks are equal for the same work, companies must compete on the basis of quality and service. That works for all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gravitas on Oct 23, 2009 12:38 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tony_opmoc on Oct 23, 2009 1:13 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But anyway what is the International dialing code for the USA - I can't remember..
Its +44 for the UK, but then you have to omit the first 0 of the UK number
"Each of us must get into the daily habit of taking 5 minutes to make four brief calls: One to the President (202-456-1414)"
"Hello Barry - You need a New Team. You've employed a bunch of Fascist Cunts"
"Yes Tony - I Know - I'm Dealing With That"
Tony
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: greenferret on Oct 23, 2009 1:23 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it, the Dems have a super-majority and they're not doing any of the things on your list. Why not add to that list: instant runoff voting, to eliminate the so-called 'spoiler effect' and allow us to vote our hopes, not our fears; proportional representation to expand the range of views represented in government; equal access to debates for all candidates, not just Democrats and Republicans; and reform of ballot access laws meant to keep citizens from participating in the political process?
Mike, I'm not asking you to register Green. Just stop acting like Greens don't exist, and acknowledge that there are other routes to change than the Democratic Party. Peace!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Mike, stop acting like the Green Party doesn't exist
Posted by: tony_opmoc
» I don't get why you think anyone has to do this for your party, one that opposes us and would like
Posted by: Beck
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Oct 23, 2009 2:47 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice. I lost mine already. IMO, anyone who had a subprime oughta be spared the shit...seein' how subprimes were schemes and immoral to begin with. Same as the housing prices.
Don' much matter no mo'... it's all shit and we know we're on our own. Always were down here in the lower classes.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Contessa1201 on Oct 23, 2009 3:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You say start your own media. I have done just that. I used to write letters and letters to all sorts of people and my voice was never heard. It was just like hitting delete instead of send. I got no return whatsoever from my many efforts to express my views on things and be heard by SOMEBODY.
I decided to write a book and get it all out there--and I followed George Bernard Shaw's maxim of "If you're going to tell people the truth, you had better make them laugh or they'll kill you."
I wrote my book. It is called VIVA LA EVOLUCION. Of course I couldn't get to first base with an agent because they are scared to take a chance. They only want guaranteed slot machines that pay off. Then nearly all the New York publishers (Macmillian, Scrivners, Knopf, Random House, St. Martin's Press, you name it, most all of them) are owned by two big German publishing outfits. An unknown, little person with these corporate guys plays like a joke.
So, thank goodness, there is Print On Demand publishing these days that will print a person’s work and put it on amazon.com, give it an ISBN number, and in the process not charge you an arm and a leg. Granted they publish everything and so a lot of it is not good, but it is giving people a forum that they would ordinarily not have.
I am one of those people. My book is coming out in about two weeks under the LULU imprint (lulu.com). I am not a novice writer and I think my book is a good one. I just did not have the years it takes to get it before the right people's eyes. If you don’t have the golden-handshake with that crowd in New York, they’re not going to give you even the recognition that indeed you are alive and a human person. You are a thing, a little person, a nobody. We don’t know you!
What is lacking in the USA is we need to get rid of the golden handshake. We the many are out here trying to make ourselves heard and make good things happen for the many instead of the few. We must yell like hell to make ourselves heard. I'm trying to do it with a book. Without some means of being heard, the fat-cat, golden-handshake people are never going to listen to us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: newsound on Oct 23, 2009 4:25 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've come to the conclusion that Canada is what it is thanks to 4 major political parties, 15 minority parties and about 20 more newer parties.
America is too much about left vs. right . . . and that's it . . . no middle ground, no alternative. The "You're either with us or against us" mentality has to go. Period.
Whatever it takes to create at least ONE MAJOR alternative party is paramount to the survival of American Democracy. (A few more couldn't hurt)
Hey Michael . . . . start a new political party. You certainly have the means . . . the money . . . . the influence . . . . the resources . . . . the following. Your next movie should be about that . . . then you'll have the momentum to make it happen. But please, don't run for office . . . we need you to keep doing what you're doing.
just and idea . . . .
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dayahka on Oct 23, 2009 7:57 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for the first idea, don't evict, this is silly. All it does is perpetuate the idea that everyone should own a home. It would also make everyone who's paying for their homes now wonder why they should continue; if the government is going to force banks to reduce mortgage payments for those who have lost jobs, why not also for those who still have jobs, but whose homes are worth much less than before?
The idea about common ownership of natural resources is not necessarily a good one. The "public" is no more likely to be responsible stewards of natural resources than Capitalism was, or Communism, or any other -ism, for that matter.
One idea that should be injected is to demand a 50% reduction across-the-board reduction in all Federal government pay scales. Right now, government workers tend to make twice what people working in private businesses make. This is exorbitant, as bad as the banksters. So, we need to reduce pay by at least 50% for all governmentsters.
Then we need to have one "pension" system for all people, in or out of government, with no double and triple dipping--and still complaining, and there's a lot of double dipping and triple dipping, collecting social security, collecting a government pension, plus working as a "consultant," or collecting disability checks and still working full time.
Then we need to withdraw the right to patents for all pharmaceuticals, shut down and hand out capital punishment to any pharmaceutical that peddles a toxic "medicine."
Then we need a Constitutional Convention.
Then we need to bring ALL the troops home and close down the hundreds of oversea bases, particularly the covert, secret, publicly unknown ones.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Birdland on Oct 24, 2009 9:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: tokerdesigner on Oct 24, 2009 1:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example, in California, Texas and elsewhere there are trillions of dead sticks which need to be picked up and clipped off and removed from drought-ridden areas to head off more billion-dollar fires. After the best branches are logged and hauled to urban centers for use in carpentry and manufacturing, shreddings and bundled brush can be parked in gullies and revines to trap rainwater leading to gradual reforestation. This program could be placed under the administration of former President G. W. Bush and named "Bushwater".
Perhaps a partnership can be arrived at where the government pays a low but honorable wage to such workers, with a place to stay and some assistance with meals, medical staffing, day-care, language-learning, access to innanet and whatever else is needed, along with the vital aid to the homeowner meeting payments.
A logical training aspect would be for everyone to learn some rudimentary carpentry so that structures can be erected in the house such as shelving units to store everyone's stuff and "mezzanines" or sleeping-lofts so that someone can sleep in a room even while the floor area remains available for working at a desk etc. In this way the occupancy of a 1500-sq.-ft. house can reach ten easily without conflict or crowding. This program can be merged with Habitat for Humanity under the leadership of Jimmy Carpenter.
If national governments can cooperate, maybe families in the US can cooperate with families in Australia, Brazil, Chile etc. so that while a skeleton staff remains in each house in the winter months, the majority of members of two families reside and work in the summer country (i.e. from October through March in the southern hemisphere etc.). This program could be named Hemigration.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lizzyfrompa on Oct 24, 2009 7:59 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dadanbetty on Oct 24, 2009 9:49 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
May justice prevail for all.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kewpie on Oct 25, 2009 4:36 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get health care insurance in my state for the poor and uninsured! What is cool about the plan is that it partners with an HMO that is local in the county where you live. I had four to choose from and I called the call center about my choices. I spoke with someone who understood the state plan and was able to make an intelligent decision.
My thought is that the federal money for the health care should go to each state to develop a plan for their population. It gets broken down even more to the local level. The recipient of Badger Care pays a co-pay and a low yearly amount. The insurance seems to work, it is not perfect, because we do not have dental or vision on the plan. Otherwise I am happy with it!
I know other states have insurance for the poor and uninsured. Why can the government look at these states for what works and what does not? Why not give each state funding to monitor and run their own health care?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kikiriki on Oct 25, 2009 10:51 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The list is good but not good enough! In my opinion, the fact of the matter is, the system is broken calling and demanding doesn't do anything. They will do what they want because they can and besides you aren't invited to their party.
We've been living in the 1800 for a long time. We can't continue to live like this. Think about it! We don't have anything to loose we don't have anything! The Government, corporate America don't even give us the BASICS, even when we are demanding them, even when we vote for them.
We can't wait any longer for change. Are we just waiting for them to die???? because then their kids will take over and they are probably worst. One example is the Bush Family. I can just see it, I can just imagine Bush's daughters in Washington trying to fulfill daddy's dreams u know kill me know and just think and be sure there's more, where that scum came from plenty of it..
I took Michael's list and shrunk it to 4 things we all can do to change the US. ultimetly the world because changing the US unfortunetly also would save the world FROM EVIL...that is right America is EVIL and you are too because u have allowed ur country to kill of everything and then u go to church.
Here is the countdown, if you really want to save the world from Evil and Ultimetly change our way of living then u should join.
4. Take the money out of your bank even if it didn't get bailout money. You most wonder what they stole from you that they didn't need the $.
3.Drop all credit cards even the ones you pay end of month Master card American Express they are both also part of the problem, don't be silly.
2. Loose your stocks,You invest you provide power to the wrong individuals. If you have to invest them make sure you arenn't investing in corporate that is going to come back to hunt u or ur neightbor.
1. GO EXEMPT from your federal taxes. AND DON'T PAY UR federal TAXES AT THE END OF THE YEAR IS THAT SIMPLE! Pay ur State taxes so your community doesn't suffer. If most of us did it at the end of year they will get the picture. Trust me nice and clear and all from the comfort of your home, no tear gas no beatings etc. I'm not saying take a vacation with that money even though is temting.. is leverage meaning THE POWER TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING; AN strategic advantage!
No one ever said a war or a revolutions were easy. by now we have nothig to loose no jobs no insurance. What bothers me most is that we are so conformist and we allow a group to do horrible things not just to us but to others around the world and we turn a BLIND EYE IS THE TRUTH and I'm really ashamed to be an American. I want to prove to the rest of world that Americans aren't stupit, we are good people we mean well and that we aren't killers we just don't know any better because we are so far away from the rest of the world. That's SAD!
Kikiriki
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Sanford on Oct 28, 2009 11:00 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Nov 12, 2009 8:39 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found the conclusions out about page 160 to be most interesting. By every good measure the United States is in 30th place when rating quality of life. This should be required reading for all true patriots.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Between Hope and Despair: Martin Luther King, Barack Obama and War
The Disaster of the Century: How to Help Haiti
Stop GOP Hooligans From Stalling Health Reform




