Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Americans Want a Public Option on Health Care -- Here's How We Can Make it Happen

By Byard Duncan, AlterNet. Posted June 24, 2009.


The only thing standing between us and real health care for all Americans are some senators and their industry friends. Time for battle.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

What's the one thing standing in the way of decent health care for all Americans? The U.S. Senate -- with help from the insurance industry lobby, of course.

As Congress debates health care reform, there has been no shortage of bickering, partisan pot shots and hollow accusations about "socializing" America's health care system. But the harem of institutional myths the right has summoned to maintain its bulging interests isn't seducing the majority of Americans, who know just how broken that system really is.

Our health care model, which at last count was leaving over 47 million Americans uninsured and millions more with poor care, is in dire need of radical reform.

Last year, the United States ranked horribly in a study of deaths that could have been prevented by timely access to health care. Conducted by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, the report found that of the 19 participating countries, France, Japan and Australia scored the highest. The U.S. was last.

"It is notable that all countries have improved substantially except the U.S.," concluded Ellen Nolte, lead author of the study.

As if that weren't enough, the World Health Organization recently ranked the U.S. system 37th in the world (one spot below Costa Rica and one above Slovenia, in case you were curious). Our life expectancy hovers at the dismal 24 spot, sandwiched between Israel and Cyprus.

What many of the countries that continue to score higher than us in these rankings have in common is universal access to health care. President Barack Obama has been vocal in his support for a public option -- an alternative that would allow all citizens access to a system like Medicaid; but congressional Republicans and some "centrist Democrats," caving to special interest groups like the insurance industry lobby, have been eager to mire the path.

Robert L. Borage, co-director of the Campaign For America's Future, explains: "The insurance lobby is unleashing the scare campaign. A strong bill will pass the House. But at this point, too many senators are still standing in the way."

It's time for the American people to make sure their voices ring louder than special interest groups. This is not just an issue of altruism -- affordable health care for everyone is in the economic interests of the country. "We now spend nearly 50 percent more on health care per capita than any other country, with mediocre results," Borage wrote.

Journalist Robert Parry helps illustrate the same problem in article of his own:

For a nation facing multiple fiscal crises -- all complicated by the costs of health care -- one might think that the most sure thing in the health care debate would be to allow a cost-saving public option, which as President Barack Obama says would help keep private health insurers "honest" regarding their promises to trim waste and control premiums.

According to a New York Times/CBS poll, that point is obvious to 72 percent of the American people who favor "offering everyone a government-administered health insurance plan like Medicare that would compete with private health insurance plans."

The American people want a public option, and it's up to concerned citizens like you to learn more about the issues surrounding Obama's plan. We must ensure that no more Americans die because of corporate bureaucracy. Here are five places you can go to learn more and take action.

Health Care For America Now

Health Care For America Now and the Institute for America's Future recently teamed up to produce a useful, state-by-state report on health care affordability. The report indicates that although health care costs in America have increased by 120 percent in the last nine years, wages have only gone up 29 percent. The result is a growing failure to stay insured among Americans who had been struggling to make their meager paychecks meet medical costs. As many as 52 million people could be uninsured next year, the study claims.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: health care, public option

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Take Action! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
SuzNc
Posted by: SuznC on Jun 24, 2009 1:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Single payer healthcare is the only kind of reform that can work--and the best way to achieve President Obama's stated goals of affordability, universal coverage and cost containment.

President Obama and the congressional leadership insist that they want to “build healthcare reform upon the existing system.” But this system, based on for-profit corporations, wastes $350-400 billion a year on administration. This is why all the reform proposals currently being drafted in Congress are so expensive!

Further, the “public option,” however well intended, simply adds another layer of complexity to the dysfunctional system we have now.

By conservative estimates, replacing private, for-profit insurance with a single-payer plan, like the kind embodied in HR 676 (Conyers) could save $3.5 to $4 trillion over the next ten years and cover everybody with high-quality, comprehensive healthcare.

It is understandable that healthcare reform advocates want to defend the public option from right wing attacks. But if single payer is the best system, why begin with a flawed compromise?

The only thing preventing us from embracing a single payer model in the United States is lack of political courage and leadership. It is up to us to force our elected representatives to take that step.

Everybody in, nobody out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SuzNc Posted by: selmaag
» RE: SuzNc Posted by: deewang
Not just the Senate
Posted by: Perry Logan on Jun 24, 2009 2:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the first commenter. The public option will not solve our health care problems and is simply a distraction.

It is not just the Senate which is standing in our way. The Obama administration is also a big part of the problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

class action suit, but against individual congresspersons, not government
Posted by: Suzon on Jun 24, 2009 3:04 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The uninsured citizens of a state might sue one or more of their elected representatives for failing to look after their interests in the face of compelling evidence that thousands of people will die prematurely for lack of proper medical attention.

A very serious way to get their attention on a very serious issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Public Option is a Gateway to Single Payer
Posted by: drricklippin on Jun 24, 2009 3:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for these practical actions we can take.

I contend that the public health option is a gateway to single payer.

I believe that Obama and his team know that we need serious historic health care reform this year. And I further believe that they will succeed.

THAT DOES NOT MEAN "EVERYTHING FOR EVERYONE" WHICH IS UNREALISTIC AND ECONOMICALLY NOT SUSTAINABLE

We all must agree that all US citizens need health care but the "more is not always better in" concept in health care must prevail.

Let's act now- The battle is enjoined!

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa
my blog

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If I know Obama and the Democrats in Congress very well, they'll water down even
Posted by: JenniferBedingfield on Jun 24, 2009 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that "public option" plan or even scrap it altogether. As a matter of fact, Obama has recently announced that he is open to dumping even the "public option" altogether as it's nothing but a phoney "compromise" designed to keep most of Big Insurance intact anyway. Even Hillary Clinton wasn't this kind of wank back in 1993-1994.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Republicans Are Trying To Kill Me
Posted by: philosimphy on Jun 24, 2009 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do they think we don't notice? Do they think this is going to be ok?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

10 Healthcare Questions Every American Should Answer
Posted by: wtfo on Jun 24, 2009 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every day I listen to the "discussions" about our nation's current healthcare crisis and wonder why virtually NOBODY in the discussion panel is forced to answer one or more of the following vital questions:

1) What is the maximum percentage of the American population that is acceptable to NOT have health care - regardless of ability to pay/affordability/availability of comprehensive coverage?

2) What is more important to you (taking into account the probability of needing one vs. the other in an average citizen's lifetime)?
a) Spending whatever is "necessary and required" for the American government to provide taxpayer-funded military services for every citizen?
b) Spending whatever is "necessary and required" for the American government to provide taxpayer-funded healthcare services for every citizen?

3) What is the maximum percentage of an American citizen's current annual income that should ever be demanded by a healthcare provider for healthcare services? What is the maximum percentage of an American citizen's current net worth that should ever be demanded by a healthcare provider for healthcare services?

4) Is for-profit healthcare moral? Is it "moral" for corporations or medical institutions to be required to provide a profit to one or more medically-uninvolved parties when delivering necessary medical or healthcare services to a prospective patient – and of denying available medical services needed to alleviate the pain or prolong the life of that patient when the required profit cannot be obtained? If so, should there be a government-mandated maximum profit or should it be purely a "market-determined" mechanism?

5) Should "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" be construed to include access to healthcare - regardless of the current ability to pay? If not, why not?

6) Is it right for citizens to be forced to pay for the healthcare of OTHER American citizens and government officials thru mandated taxes (e.g. Medicare, Medicaid, V.A. Health Expenses, Tax Payment for Government Official Health Expenses, etc.) but not have their taxes provide for THEIR OWN healthcare first?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

10 Healthcare Questions Every American Should Answer - Continued.
Posted by: wtfo on Jun 24, 2009 6:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
7) Is it right for the American taxpayer to fund and guarantee government-provided healthcare coverage of American citizens based solely on age? Why is it that ONLY after they reach the age of 65 are this country's citizens guaranteed access to government healthcare? Isn't this a violation of "equal protection under the law"?

8) Why is it right and proper for our government (be it State or Federal in nature) to provide police protection, fire protection, security protection (FBI/CIA/US Military, etc.), and legal protection to its citizens but NOT provide affordable access to healthcare and medical services? Of what value are any of these other government-provided protections when a citizen or family member is in critical need of healthcare to alleviate pain or prolong life?

9) Are we as a nation getting our money's worth from every dollar we currently spend on our healthcare? What percentage of every current dollar spent on healthcare is actually going to the direct treatment of the patient vs. the percentage going to paperwork, administrative overhead, 3rd, 4th, or 5th party profit, executive compensation, and payments to insurance companies (e.g. litigation insurance)? Couldn't a non-profit government-provided healthcare system be more cost efficient to run and manage if it didn’t have to pay for all these other expenses not directly related to healthcare delivery?

10) Is our healthcare system REALLY better than those in other major industrialized nations - e.g. Canada, England/Germany/Western Europe, Japan, etc.? If it IS better than these other nations, can you prove it statistically and via unbiased comparisons? If it IS NOT better, why are so afraid to elect to adapt the best concepts of some of these other national healthcare policies?

Unless and until we force our citizens and those who are in power (or who have access to our airwaves) to truthfully and completely answer questions like these I do not think we will ever get the healthcare system we deserve. We will likely just muddle along like we are now until the average American citizen gets so overwhelmed and infuriated with the inherent problems in access, affordability, and fairness of our current system that he or she either takes to the streets in violent protest or leaves the country altogether in search of a better life elsewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm not campaigning for anything less than single payer.
Posted by: Amy27605 on Jun 24, 2009 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have no interest in supporting a so-called public option; I think it's a horrible idea that will not help enough people and will not save much money.

I'm sorry, Dr. Rick and others who think it will lead inevitably to single payer: You may be right, but it won't happen fast enough, in my opinion, even if it's implemented immediately. And I've read that the plans now in the running would not take effect for 3 or 4 years; if this is true, then it's at least that long before the progression to single payer that you foresee can even get started. We should pass single payer now, and have it go into effect now--not give the insurance companies several years to bribe politicians to water it down or reverse it.

I have also read that the public option as proposed will require everyone to purchase insurance or be fined. I would not call that an "option."

Some different resources, focused on single payer:
www.healthcare-now.org
www.health-justice.org

Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Single payer - period. If people want to keep their shitty insurance, let them, but
Posted by: thekidde on Jun 24, 2009 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
everyone in the US must be covered. Let the for profit rip offs ($122 million in 2005 for the CEO of UnitedHealth Group? puke)compete or die - I prefer die.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need to fix a CIA funding loophole before we have government healthcare
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Jun 24, 2009 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The CIA Act of 1949 authorizes the CIA to take as much money as they want from any government department or program and put it into unacknowledged waived special access programs which Congress has no oversight over.

By making the government even larger we are giving the CIA an even bigger pool of money from which to fund its programs that are kept hidden from the public and the Congress.

Aaron Russo who was a friend of Nick Rockefeller (Rockefeller foundations help fund Alternet by the way) said that he was told by Nick that the main reason the Rockefellers funded Women's Lib was to be able to tax women (who historically did not have paying jobs) and to separate children from their parents and get kids to see the state as being more their family.

There are ulterior motives by some advocates of government health care. Have government health care if you must but close the CIA funding loophole first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Playing with a computer is fun but it will not get a public option
Posted by: solrev on Jun 24, 2009 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans would be wise to learn a lesson from the Iranian people. Electronic support of healthcare is fine but easily blocked or ignored by congress. Americans need to become visible. Dean should get the people in the streets if there are really any people. Walk a mile for health and healthcare reform march day. At least the rest of the world could see that we are just as screwed by our government as they are by theirs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stop putting throw pillow on the Titanic's deck chairs
Posted by: JerseyGeoff on Jun 24, 2009 8:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What this article misses is any real reference to single payer HR 676-
Some comments pick up on this but only single payer will work in the long run.
why does this piece shill for HCAN/Dean- why not an ecumenical approach that supports all including healthcare-now, 1payer.net etc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No, most Americans want a public certainty, not option
Posted by: sherry on Jun 24, 2009 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We want a certainty, a guarantee. We want dignity. We want what other developed nations have, national health care. Not an option --- not a thousand different plans and levels and conditions to plow through.

We want single-payer. The only health care bill filed in the House is HR 676, with 83 signers as of today. Why are we asked to support a public option when there's not even a bill to read? This article, like most of the media, ignores the bill that actually exists and has support.

July 30 --- let's take it to the streets. Check out Healthcare-NOW for details, education, and what to do between now and July 30.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's morally wrong...
Posted by: reg373 on Jun 24, 2009 9:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to leave 100 million Americans un or underinsured and 1 illness away from financial ruin. And it's wrong to burden small business with the outrageous insurance costs also -- found a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WeWantThePublic Option.com
Posted by: Ashleigh127 on Jun 24, 2009 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you support the public option, make sure your voice is heard. Add your name to this list and it may appear in an ad that will run on CNN, MSNBC, and the Daily Show. You can be sure that Senators and their staffers will see it. www.WeWantThePublicOption.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

?
Posted by: Redviper on Jun 24, 2009 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who's going to pay for THIS marvelous new entitlement? You know what bothers the hell out of me? I know folks who can easily afford to buy coverage. They don't because they think they don't need it. Then, when the inevitable happens they cry like babies about the system not being "fair."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Who's going to pay Posted by: wtfo
The only thing preventing the single-payer model
Posted by: leighsure on Jun 24, 2009 12:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is the way political campaigns are funded. This is what is stopping ALL meaningful reform.
Corporations are calling the shots because they are the ones that can foot the bill, no matter how high, to get their political sellouts elected. Any change has to go through those sellouts in Congre$$, and they're not going to jeopardize their chance at re-election by bucking the interests of their corporate masters.

The current healthcare crisis is the perfect opportunity for We, the people to get some real change. Too many people know what has gone wrong with the present "shitstem", enough that a majority of the Republican electorate are in favor of a public option.

We need to begin with a "flawed compromise" because most of the population is too stupid, uninformed or otherwise malleable to see beyond the lies of Private Insurance, Big Pharma, the AMA, the Corporate Media and others of that ilk. Those that are already fully insured are not going to give up their flawed present for an unknown future.
We MUST go with the "flawed compromise" - that way when people can see that it works better and is cheaper, they won't be afraid to dump the private model. They need to be reassured that they can choose their own doctors and hospitals, and that there will be no delays in visits and treatments.

I can absolutely guarantee that if all your efforts are expended on "seeking the perfect at the expense of the good", you and the rest of America will lose.

My personal choice in this fight is go for the imperfect, because I know this a battle that can be won. But not by sitting on the sidelines whining about the evils of the "Corporate Shitstem". I have proposed to fight for an acceptable reform on AlterNet and other progressive sites before, and will continue to do so for as long as it takes for others to realize that the only way that reform is going to happen is to hit Corporate Power where it hurts - in the pocketbook!

How? GENERAL STRIKE, GENERAL STRIKE, GENERAL STRIKE.

No work, no consumption, no money for the Corporate Maw! Think about it. Imagine it! I wonder if you can?

Where does change start? With you and me, and all the other "you and me"s in sentient America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTHCARE IS AN OXYMORON
Posted by: jacksmith on Jun 24, 2009 7:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AMERICA’S NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY!

It’s official. America and the World are now in a GLOBAL PANDEMIC. A World EPIDEMIC with potential catastrophic consequences for ALL of the American people. The first PANDEMIC in 41 years. And WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES will have to face this PANDEMIC with the 37th worst quality of healthcare in the developed World.

STAND READY AMERICA TO SEIZE CONTROL OF YOUR NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.

We spend over twice as much of our GDP on healthcare as any other country in the World. And Individual American spend about ten times as much out of pocket on healthcare as any other people in the World. All because of GREED! And the PRIVATE FOR PROFIT healthcare system in America.

And while all this is going on, some members of congress seem mostly concern about how to protect the corporate PROFITS! of our GREED DRIVEN, PRIVATE FOR PROFIT NATIONAL DISGRACE. A PRIVATE FOR PROFIT DISGRACE that is in fact, totally valueless to the public health. And a detriment to national security, public safety, and the public health.

Progressive democrats and others should stand firm in their demand for a robust public option for all Americans, with all of the minimum requirements progressive democrats demanded. If congress can not pass a robust public option with at least 51 votes and all robust minimum requirements, congress should immediately move to scrap healthcare reform and demand that President Obama declare a state of NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY! Seizing and replacing all PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance plans with the immediate implementation of National Healthcare for all Americans under the provisions of HR676 (A Single-payer National Healthcare Plan For All).

Coverage can begin immediately through our current medicare system. With immediate expansion through recruitment of displaced workers from the canceled private sector insurance industry. Funding can also begin immediately by substitution of payroll deductions for private insurance plans with payroll deductions for the national healthcare plan. This is what the vast majority of the American people want. And this is what all objective experts unanimously agree would be the best, and most cost effective for the American people and our economy.

In Mexico on average people who received medical care for A-H1N1 (Swine Flu) with in 3 days survived. People who did not receive medical care until 7 days or more died. This has been the same results in the US. But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage. And at least 200 million of you with insurance could not get in to see your private insurance plans doctors in 2 or 3 days, even if your life depended on it. WHICH IT DOES!

Contact congress and your representatives NOW! AND SPREAD THE WORD!

God Bless You

Jacksmith – WORKING CLASS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The ONE thing standing between us and Real Health Care
Posted by: Kimberly on Jun 24, 2009 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
DOJ Alternate Dispute Resolution T42CFR417.1 systematic denial of covered claims Racketeering
.
Title 18 US Code section 286 Conspiracy to defraud the Government [ and Entitled Individuals ] With RESPECT to [ T42CFR409.33 Post-Hospital Extended Care ] CLAIMS - WHOEVER enters into any agreement, combination, or conspiracy to defraud the United States [ HHS T42CFR417.1 and DOJ Alternate Dispute Resolution T18CFR242CRIME Federal HMO VOLENTARY DISCLOUSURE Program ], or any department or agency thereof, by obtaining or aiding to obtain the payment or ALLOWANCE of any false, fictitious or fraudulent claim, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or BOTH.
.
2007 - H.R. 3199 SENSENBRENNER - COLOR OF LAW - Judiciary (Subject to a Rule) (Sec. 4) Requires the ATTORNEY GENERAL, on an ANNUAL BASIS [ misprison of a felony ~ T18CFR242CRIME ], to submit to the House and Senate Judiciary Committees a report containing: (1) the Number of Accounts [ Federal HMO HAPCORP.ORG et al racketeering ] from which the Department of Justice (DOJ) has received VOLENTARY DISCLOUSURES [ 1998 U.S. Attorney General and HHS OIG Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP) Program, see 63 Fed. Reg. 58,399 ~T18CFR286CRIME 1996 HIPAA Violation T18CFR371CRIME Color of Law ] of customer communications or records under provisions authorizing disclosure of the contents of electronic communications in Emergencies [ Federal Hospital Insurance Services ] INVOLVING IMMEDIATE DANGER OF DEATH OR SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURY [ T42CFR417.1 HHS Employee grievance procedure | Alternate Dispute Resolution 42CFR438.704 adverse determination T42CFR409.33 Anti-dumping Violation ]; and (2) a summary of the basis for voluntary disclosures to DOJ where the pertinent investigation was CLOSED WITHOUT the filing of CRIMINAL CHARGES ( 9-110.100 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Willfully failed to keep an individual from harm .... 42CFR438.704 misprison of felony T18CFR286CRIME ALLOWING ~ OIG, HCFA, FBI & U.S. Attorneys to conduct Federal HMO Hospital Insurance & HCFA State Medicaid kickback fraud, against American Citizens - Entitled INDIVIDUALs - COLOR of LAW T18CFR242CRIME ~ illegal kickback conversions - Anti-Dumping Violations - Consumer Fraud ) Contact - THOMAS (Library of Congress) . 9-110.800 Violent Crimes in Aid of RACKETEERING Activity (18 U.S.C. § 1959)
.
[CITE: 42CFR1003.105] Sec. 1003.105 Exclusion from participation in [ HCFA ] Medicare, Medicaid and all Federal health care programs [ OPM FEHB, TRICARE, CHAMPVA ]. A gross and flagrant violation is one that presents an imminent danger [ 1998 HHS OIG Provider Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP), see 63 Fed. Reg. 58,399 ~ HHS T42CFR417.1 ~ 1996 HIPAA Violation ~ Denial of COVERED T42CFR409.33 Claims ~ 42CFR438.704 Anti-Dumping Violation, used to Force illegal HCFA State Medicaid KICKBACK Conversions ] to the health, safety or well-being of the INDIVIDUAL [ Retired OPM FEHBP all HMO Beneficiaries ] who seeks emergency examination and treatment [ Hospital Insurance Benefits T42CFR409.33 ] or places that individual unnecessarily in a high-risk situation T18CFR242crime | Racketeering
.
Sincerely,
All ENTITLED Federal Employee Health Beneficiaries & the General Public in Region 5 HCFA, who are being criminally denied HHS T42CFR417.1 Existing ( Federal State Private ) HMO Health Insurance Coverage, illegally billed for HMO denied covered claims and forced into HCFA State Medicaid Programs for the POOR. Title18CFR1001Crime. 1998 still pending 2009, denial of civil and criminal rights - reporting waste fraud and abuse - Color of Law T18CFR242CRIME.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"POOR HEATH CARE IS A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION" - Rep. D. Kucinich
Posted by: AlwaysAskWhy on Jun 25, 2009 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"TAXES ARE THE SWEAT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE," AND WE CHOOSE SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE, NOT CORPORATE WAR-FOR-PROFIT OR CORPORATE WELFARE AT THE COST OF MILLIONS OF LIVES AND HUMAN SUFFERING!!

SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE WILL CHANGE LIFE IN AMERICA, AS WE KNOW IT. AND IT'S NOT ABOUT ONLY ABOUT MONEY!

> CORPORATIONS SHOULDN'T HAVE TO BEAR THE BURDEN AND COST of this nation's health care, improving our economy.

> END ACRIMONIOUS LABOR/CORPORATE NEGOTIATIONS. Create a more harmonious workplace.

> WORKERS CAN WORK WHERE THEY WANT, including in non-profits, and employers will have workers who WANT to be there, and they will be healthier, happier, and more valuable.

> Workers can RETIRE when they are TIRED, not stay in jobs because of fear of losing health care for themselves or a loved one.

>OUR WORKING YOUTH and STUDENTS (18+ years old) WILL HAVE HEALTH CARE...closing the chasm between no job, no parents and no health care!

>Older workers can FURTHER THEIR EDUCATION without fear of losing health care for themselves or their family -- creating a better educated workforce and society!

> CARE FOR THE ELDERLY has been an UTTER NIGHTMARE for families. Single-payer will create better quality health care for those we love and who have cared for US.

> LOWER THE STRESS AND ALLEVIATE THE SUFFERING AND DEATH!! This nation is STRESSED OUT because of lack of health care!!! The SUFFERING IS HORRIFIC for millions. EVER SPEND THE NIGHT, SICK AS A DOG, TRYING TO SIT UP IN AN EMERGENCY ROOM AT A COUNTY HOSPITAL? PEOPLE ARE LEFT LYING ON THE FLOORS, NEVER CHECKED ON BY HOSPITAL STAFF. IT'S SICKENING AND FRIGHTENING.

REFUSAL TO ENACT A SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE IS A CONSPIRACY TO MASS MURDER -- FOR PROFIT. YES, IT IS.

WHO PROFITS from FROM DENYING HEALTH CARE?: REPUBLICANS, YES. BUT DEMOCRATS, FEINSTEIN, BAUCHUS, CONRAD AND MARY LANDRIEU, WHO TAKE THE MOST MONEY FROM THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY, ARE BLOCKING SINGLE PAYER, AND THEY MUST GO!

Tell them so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Single-Payer, Government Insurance is NOT and Entitlement
Posted by: harpy on Jun 25, 2009 12:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm so sick of hearing about entitlements (as one commenter above posted) as if the people never pay a penny to get benefits. There would be a premium, which Medicare patients pay now, which comes out of their check. The big difference is that their co-pay is $10.00 for a regular doc and $20.00 for a specialist. There's no deductible, and there's no pre-existing denial. That happens because EVERYBODY above a certain income level pays into the system and by collective bargaining by sheer numbers, the prices are driven down.
When you have a for-profit-and-death-and-misery insurance policy, you pay a premium (tax)then you pay a deductible (tax), then you pay a co-pay (tax)and then you 100% for "pre-existing" conditions (tax).
As for your non-insured folks,yes, they'll pay 100% of their bill because they have NO BARGAINING POWER. The uninsured pay approximately 60-75% more than the insured. I'm going by my BCBS Explanation of Benefits Statement on this point, because they spell it out.
We need single-payer government insurance now!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRIVATE FOR PROFIT HEALTHCARE IS AN OXYMORON
Posted by: jacksmith on Jun 26, 2009 1:11 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AMERICA’S NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY!

It’s official. America and the World are now in a GLOBAL PANDEMIC. A World EPIDEMIC with potential catastrophic consequences for ALL of the American people. The first PANDEMIC in 41 years. And WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES will have to face this PANDEMIC with the 37th worst quality of healthcare in the developed World.

STAND READY AMERICA TO SEIZE CONTROL OF YOUR NATIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEM.

We spend over twice as much of our GDP on healthcare as any other country in the World. And Individual American spend about ten times as much out of pocket on healthcare as any other people in the World. All because of GREED! And the PRIVATE FOR PROFIT healthcare system in America.

And while all this is going on, some members of congress seem mostly concern about how to protect the corporate PROFITS! of our GREED DRIVEN, PRIVATE FOR PROFIT NATIONAL DISGRACE. A PRIVATE FOR PROFIT DISGRACE that is in fact, totally valueless to the public health. And a detriment to national security, public safety, and the public health.

Progressive democrats and others should stand firm in their demand for a robust public option for all Americans, with all of the minimum requirements progressive democrats demanded. If congress can not pass a robust public option with at least 51 votes and all robust minimum requirements, congress should immediately move to scrap healthcare reform and demand that President Obama declare a state of NATIONAL HEALTHCARE EMERGENCY! Seizing and replacing all PRIVATE FOR PROFIT health insurance plans with the immediate implementation of National Healthcare for all Americans under the provisions of HR676 (A Single-payer National Healthcare Plan For All).

Coverage can begin immediately through our current medicare system. With immediate expansion through recruitment of displaced workers from the canceled private sector insurance industry. Funding can also begin immediately by substitution of payroll deductions for private insurance plans with payroll deductions for the national healthcare plan. This is what the vast majority of the American people want. And this is what all objective experts unanimously agree would be the best, and most cost effective for the American people and our economy.

In Mexico on average people who received medical care for A-H1N1 (Swine Flu) with in 3 days survived. People who did not receive medical care until 7 days or more died. This has been the same results in the US. But 50 million Americans don’t even have any healthcare coverage. And at least 200 million of you with insurance could not get in to see your private insurance plans doctors in 2 or 3 days, even if your life depended on it. WHICH IT DOES!

Contact congress and your representatives NOW! AND SPREAD THE WORD!

God Bless You

Jacksmith – WORKING CLASS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

robert56
Posted by: Robert56 on Jun 26, 2009 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Australia we have a system called Medicare where you can go to the doctor for nothing if you're unemployed or disabled. You can even go to hospital and not be charged a single cent if you have a medicare card and are entitled to free care. if you've got a job you can choose to stay with the Medicare system and pay a nominal fee which is more than reasonable or insure yourself with one of the reasonably priced private health funds.
You people in America are really getting ripped off something fierce. I can't believe that in the biggest economy in the world people still struggle with private health ffees and absorbatant prices when you need to go to hospital or have private treatment by a specialist etc...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Discredit Insurers Out of Our Way
Posted by: Baja K on Jun 27, 2009 10:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Except for some excellent work by several Physicians for a National Health Program, Single Payer advocates are being far too nice to the Insurance Industry.
Those PNHP doctors revealed twice, once just in late May, that top insurers invest billions in everyone's most despised health-damaging industry---cigarette makers.

Looking further into SEC filings, one finds that health insurers also invest heavily in tobacco pesticides, pharmaceuticals that make tobacco pesticides, pesticides in general, all sorts of dioxin-creating chlorine industries, big oil, military weaponry, genetically engineered "food", fast food, mountaintop removal coal mining---and on and on.

No public official can explain, in public, how it is ok that insurance customers provide funding for investments in industries that, in some cases, may well have caused ones illness in the first place. No official can explain how those conflicts of interest do not compromise public health.

Single Payer advocates ought to routinely describe insurers as investors in whatever industries they invest in. To not have that clearly in mind is to not fully understand the motives of the opponents of single payer. They want the investment money to keep flowing from us to insurers to the cigarette cartel, for just one.

If insurers seem to be opponents of their own cigarette making investment properties, that is not the case. Insurers war against just the tobacco plant, and against smokers, the victims. Such insurers say or do nothing about the hosts of tobacco pesticide residues in most cigarettes, carcinogenic dioxins from chlorine adulterants, added burn accelerants, carcinogenic radiation from certain tobacco fertilizers, or any of that. In fact, insurers work zealously to avoid that topic entirely in order to evade the potentially monumental liabilities. The "war on tobacco", wrapped in wholesome rhetoric, is not about protecting anyone's health.

If justice ever came into play, those insurers and the complicit cigarette contaminating industries would be paying for a national public health program, not being set up to profit further in this arena.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: ed hardy
Posted by: deewang on Jul 20, 2009 6:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fficial Ed Hardy Store for all Clothing and Gear. Buy Direct and Save. Inspired by Christian Audigier, the lifestyle brand includes Ed Hardy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

they could be sexy
Posted by: deewang on Jul 20, 2009 6:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for a resourceful content. this is what i have been looking for so long. I don't get the idea why they start these kind of trial when the criminal are old. Perhaps this more personal form of accountability will deter future actors where the fear of international condemnation has not. Ed Hardy stores are located in many locations internationally including the Americas, Europe and Asia.

----------------------------------
Ed Hardy | Cheap Ed Hardy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement