9/11: ONE YEAR LATER  
comments_image -

Desperately Seeking 9/11 Status

With a clever lawyer, you too can start a 9-11 charity -- and give nothing to the victims.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest 9/11: One Year Later headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

You can squint at the fine print. You can click on every link. But even the keenest eyes won't find mention of September 11 relief efforts on the web site of the Animal Friendly License Plate Association, a nonprofit agency in Kansas City, Mo. That's troubling, because while its name might suggest otherwise, AFLPA is on the Internal Revenue Service's list of charities established to provide relief to victims of America's recent tragedy.

As part of a post-September 11 effort to facilitate charitable donations, the IRS expedited the process by which it grants tax-exempt status to nonprofits. But as it turns out, every tax-deductible cent donated to the AFLPA goes not to New York City firefighters or Cantor Fitzgerald widows, but rather to spay/neuter programs for Missouri's dogs and cats. So why does this organization appear on the IRS list of September 11 charities? "My lawyer disguised it to move it through," admits AFLPA Co-Chair Michelle Thill. "I was tired of waiting. My lawyer pretty much assured me that we would get the [nonprofit] status, but he just grabbed hold of the opportunity."

AFLPA is just one of many new charities to claim a September 11 affiliation. On Sept. 18, the IRS announced "a special expedited review and approval process for new organizations seeking tax-exempt status to provide relief to the victims." These would-be charities needed only to write "Disaster Relief, Sept. 11, 2001" atop their application to receive "immediate attention" that reduced turnaround time -- normally 120 days -- to as little as five days. To date, more than 200 organizations have been granted expedited tax-exempt status. All of them are listed on the IRS website (www.irs.gov). But not all are providing disaster relief.

Fishy Nonprofits

Take the Washington, DC Marketing Center, a spin-off of the D.C. Chamber of Commerce, which mysteriously found itself on the IRS list of September 11 nonprofits. Marketing Center representatives insist that the listing "must be an administrative error" because the group's application was approved shortly after the attacks. But according to an employee, the organization's lawyer, Olivia Shay-Byrne, managed to put it on the fast track once the expedited disaster-relief procedures were announced. Exactly how Ms. Byrne did this is a mystery. She refused repeated interview requests and wouldn't release the Center's 1023 form, even though the latter is required by law.

Then there's Whitebird Productions, another organization claiming to have been "misplaced" among the disaster-relief charities. Whitebird is a nonprofit that promotes the arts in Ft. Collins, Colo. The charity's president and co-founder, Jeri Nichols-Park, says that she learned about the September 11 provision from her accountant, who wrote to the IRS requesting expedited approval. She insists, however, that she did not portray Whitebird as a disaster-relief charity. "We did try to get on board as far as helping," she allows. "We did have a table set aside for donations. We told the IRS we would do that." But she professes ignorance as to how she wound up on the list, saying "that's crazy" and reiterating that "our only purpose is to promote the arts in Ft. Collins."

Or how about the Alaska Culinary Association? The group's stated mission is not disaster relief, but "to help young culinarians to get established in the local food community." Yet it got expedited service anyway because the IRS doesn't demand that an organization be devoted to disaster relief, only that it promise to do something disaster related. To meet its requirement, the culinary association held a single fundraising dinner for the Windows of Hope Family Relief Fund -- a bona fide 9-11 charity devoted exclusively to providing aid, future scholarships, and funds to families of the food service industry workers killed in September. As it happens, the association didn't need a 501(c)(3) designation to hold a charity fundraiser. "You can hold a fundraiser for Windows of Hope without 501(c)(3) status," says Windows of Hope Director Darlene Dwyer. "People just make out their tax-deductible donations directly to us."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest 9/11: One Year Later headlines via email
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Occupy Protesters Mic-Check Palin During CPAC Speech

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Apple, Accustomed to Profits and Praise, Faces Outcry for Labor Practices at Chinese Factories

By Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez | Democracy Now!

 
 
Could Santorum Actually Beat Romney? And Would the Obama Campaign be Ready?

By Steve M. | Booman Tribune

 
 
Bill Moyers: The Economy Has Been Engineered to Screw Over Millennials (With an AlterNet Shoutout!)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Maher: Conservatives Are the Ones Dividing the Country

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
In Kansas, Is Catholic Church Trying to Destroy A Victim's Advocates Organization?

By Julie Cain | Ms. Magazine Blog

 
 
Obama vs. the Concern Trolls on Nonsense "Religious Liberty" Issue

By Digby | Hullabaloo

 
 
At CPAC, Santorum Surges Despite Idiotic Claims; Romney Poses as 'Severe' Conservative; Gingrich Makes War on GOP

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Wisconsin's Gov. Walker Appeals to CPAC Crowd for Help Fending Off Recall

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
In Birth Control Debate, Cable News Disproportionately Asked Men What They Thought of Women's Health

By Faiz Shakir and Adam Peck | Think Progress

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]