9/11: ONE YEAR LATER  
comments_image -

Don't Bomb Afghanistan

With the deployment of "Operation Infinite Justice," as the Pentagon has dubbed the order of combat aircraft to bases in the Persian Gulf, it appears a military strike against Afghanistan is in the works. Here's why it's a bad idea.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest 9/11: One Year Later headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

It appears that the United States is preparing for a major military strike against Afghanistan. There is no question that the United States needs to respond forcefully to bring the perpetrators of last week's terrorist attack to justice and to prevent future attacks. A large-scale military action against that country, however, would be a big mistake.

We are not fighting a government with clear fixed targets, such as command and control centers, intelligence headquarters or major military complexes. A loose network of terrorist cells does not have the kind of tangible assets that can be seriously crippled by military strikes.

The Taliban regime in Afghanistan has given Bin Laden and his supporters sanctuary, but this is not a typical case of state-backed terrorism. As a result of Bin Laden's personal fortune and elaborate international network, he does not need and apparently has not received direct financial or logistical support from the Afghan government. Destroying government resources in Afghanistan, therefore, will not in any way cripple Bin Laden and his cohorts.

The Afghan people are the first and primary victims of the Taliban, perhaps the most totalitarian regime on Earth. It would be a tragedy to victimize them still further through a large-scale military operation which would almost certainly lead to widespread civilian casualties. The Taliban's lack of concern for their own people is already evident as is the Afghan people's hatred for but inability to challenge this reactionary theocracy.

Mass military action would not only fail to change their policy but it would punish the wrong people, who have already suffered through a 23-year nightmare of communist dictatorship, foreign invasion, civil war, competing war lords and fundamentalist rule.

Indeed, attempting to destroy the country's infrastructure would do little good. It has already been done.

Should the United States bomb Kabul or other Afghan cities, Taliban leaders would likely escape harm in their bunkers or in remote mountain outposts. The deaths of civilians would likely strengthen support for the regime and even Bin Laden himself, as people under attack tend to rally around their flag.

A ground invasion, as the Soviets learned all too well in the 1980s, would put the United States in an unwinnable counter-insurgency war in a hostile terrain against a people with a long history of resisting outsiders.

In addition, large-scale military strikes would put the United States in violation of international law, since the use of military force is legitimate only for self-defense, not for retaliation.

By contrast, a limited attack against suspected terrorists -- involving small commando units, Special Forces, SWAT team-style operations -- could bring those responsible to justice and break up the terrorist cells, which could commit attacks in the future yet not create the backlash a more blunt use of force would create.

To fight international terrorism requires international cooperation. The United States needs the active support of Muslim countries to track down and break up Bin Laden's terrorist cells, which exist well beyond the borders of Afghanistan. Precipitous military action could threaten the unity needed to deal with this very real threat. A large-scale military response would also distract world attention away from the crimes of this past Tuesday where it belongs and onto the appropriateness or inappropriateness of the American attack.

There is an enormous irony if the United States goes to war against the Taliban government of Afghanistan, given that the U.S. played a major role in bringing these Islamic extremists to power. Indeed, the Central Intelligence Agency trained Bin Laden and many of his followers in Afghan refugee camps in Pakistan during the 1980s. One of the reasons that he has such a far-flung multinational network is that the CIA actively recruited radical Muslims from throughout Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa to join the Afghan mujahadin in their fight against Soviet forces and their puppet regime in Kabul.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest 9/11: One Year Later headlines via email
Email
Print
submit to reddit
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Male AZ Rep. Pushes 20-Week Abortion Ban in D.C., But Won't Let Female D.C. Rep. Speak at Hearing

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
GOP Rep on Coathanger Abortions: "You Have to Start Somewhere"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Debt Limit Debacle, Part 2: GOP Will Drag Government, Economy to Hell to Appease Wingnuts

By Ed Kilgore | Washington Monthly

 
 
Gates: Israeli Strike On Iran ‘May End Up In A Much Larger Middle East Conflict’

By Ali Gharib | Think Progress

 
 
House Set to Vote on Xenophobic, Homophobic Version of VAWA; Obama Threatens Veto

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Hilarious: Inside the Actor's Studio Host Gives Romney Advice on "How to Be Human"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Occupy's First Real Trial: Acquitted Thanks to Citizen Journalism!

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Rachel Maddow to GOP Homophobes Now Claiming Tolerance: "That is Absolute Bull"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Today's GOP: The Worst Political Party in 150 Years of US History

By BooMan | Booman Tribune

 
 
Pro-Medical Pot Candidate Defeats Dispensary-Buster in Dem Primary for Oregon AG

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]